Channel
@nim_vajab_harf
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
318subscribers
-8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001198610294 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nim_vajab_harf |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nim_vajab_harf |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 04:21 | 318 | -2 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 09:55 | 320 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 10:11 | 321 | -3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 07:32 | 324 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:32 | 326 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:23 | 326 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 14 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
47 reactions across 13 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 24 | 51.1% | |
| 💔 | 19 | 40.4% | |
| 🕊 | 4 | 8.51% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 47 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 June 2026 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
از دست دادن پدیدهی عظیمیه. عظیم از لحاظ غم. آدمی که از دست دادی همونی بود که احساس میکردی با همهی سلولهات دوستش داری و اگه نباشه میمیری، حالا دیگه نیست. وقتی از دست دادن رو آدم تجربه میکنه و از اون طوفان بیرون میاد، حتی زخمی، دیگه هیچ چیز دیگهای نمیتونه زمینش بزنه.
بسم رب الحسین ما هرموقع نیازِ به کمکهای خیری داشتیم، دستهای شما واسطهٔ خدا شدن برای انجام شدنش، حالا هم میخوایم باهم کمک کنیم سه نفر زائر اولی اربعین تو آغوش امام حسین علیهالسلام باشن، عزیزانم این زائر اولیها از سیستان و بلوچستان هستند و راه طولانیای برای رسیدن به اباعبدالله دارن، بسمالله بگیم و راهیشون کنیم… ۶۰۳۷۹۹۷۵۲۲۰۰۶۸۸۲ میر
اشک! اگر قرار بر دلسوزی باشد. اگر قرار بر همدردی با اشک باشد. این مادران شهدا میناب که قطعات پیکر کودکان را دفن می کنند سزاوارترند تا سلبریتی که اشک تمساح می ریزد و قبلتر [تا آخرین برنامه جام جهانی] کاسبی اش را کرده است. این تصاویر را ببینید. هیچ کارگردانی ندارد. فیلم سینمایی نیست. پایان باز اصغر فرهادی نیست. اصلا سینما ما به این صحنه واقعی کاری ندارد. اما کارگردانی این صحنه غریب با خداست. واقعیت این جهانِ جنگ طل…
واسه دلی که غم داره، خدا حسین رو نگه داره...
و تمام.
رواق دارالذکر ❤️
اگر انقدر برای تفکرت ارزش قائل نشدی که مطالعه کنی و از اندیشه انقلاب و شهید خامنهای دفاع کنی، پس انقلابی نباش!
من نمیتونم نمیتونم اسمت رو بزنم برات نماز شب اول قبر بخونند ..
💔2
دل از دست دادیم دلبر از دست دادیم ❤️🩹
💔4
@mah_jour
💔3
نماز آقا رو خوندیم و هنوز زنده ایم؟ ما را به سخت جانی خود این گمان نبود ....
💔2
برای کسانی که از حضور محرومن دعا کنید ...
❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @nim_vajab_harf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@nim_vajab_harf named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“نیم وجب حرف 🎒” (@nim_vajab_harf), 318 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nim_vajab_harf.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.