Channel
@nim_faseleh83
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
56subscribers
+27 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003918476226 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nim_faseleh83 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 1 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nim_faseleh83 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 03:58 | 56 | +3 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 20:19 | 53 | +8 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 13:08 | 45 | +4 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 13:12 | 41 | +6 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:36 | 35 | +6 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:15 | 29 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:17 | 29 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
48 reactions across 15 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 27 | 56.3% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 18.8% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 6.25% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 4.17% | |
| 🤓 | 2 | 4.17% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 2.08% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 2.08% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 2.08% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 2.08% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 2.08% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
بعضیها همانگونه که خودشان لطیف و ظریفاند، قلم شان نیز میراثدار این خصلت جادویی است. بعد از چهار پنج ساعتِ درسی و خستگی که کل جانم را به چالش کشیده بود اتاق آمدم تا لحظهای سر در گریبان خود گذاشته و آرام بگیرم؛ تا شاید ذرهای ازین خستگیها امانم دهد! همینطور که سر روی بالشت گذاشته بودم، چشمم به قفسهی کتابها افتاد که لایشان چند ورقی کهنهای دیده میشد. فکرم را با خودشان برد که اینها چه باشد. وقتی سراغ گرفتم، …
❤4
جلسهی دو صدو چهل و دومِ انسان شناسی استاد شجاعی را گوش میدادم، نکتهی لطیفی را بیان کردند که لازم دیدم با شما نیز شریک کنم؛ درین جلسه، ضمن نکتههای ارزندهای که در مسألهی زبان گفتند، این نکته خیلی قابل توجه بود: اِجتِناب السَیّئات اَولی من اِکتساب الحَسنات؛ دوری از گناه مهمتر از کسب ثواب است. یعنی، ثواب و عمل خیر زمانی که با معصیت همراه گردد ماهیت خود را از دست میدهد. ثوابی ثواب است که باعث انجام معصیت نگردد. از…
❤3👍1👏1
برای رشد جمعی اقدامات زیر پیشنهاد میشود، نظر تان قابل قدر است!
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
قابل توجه! دوستان گرامی، بعد ازین روزی یک درس از درسهای اصول نویسندگی استاد افضلی و چندی از نکات لازم درین مورد را خدمت عزیزان میگذارم، تا باعث رشد همگی ما باشد!
❤2✍1👍1👎1
نیمفاصله🌱 pinned a photo
بزرگواران، قرار همیشگی یاد تان نرود! اللهم عجل لولیک الفرج!
❤3
بحث بالا کشید، استاد از شاگرادن پرسید که برای انتخاب همسر آینده، چه ملاکها ومعیارهای را در نظر دارند؛ چون استاد ما با خواهران مشترک است و این مساله را با آنها نیز مطرح کرده بود؛ به همین دلیل خواست یک مقایسه نماید. در ابتدا چهار گزینه را بهعنوان گزینههای پیشنهادی مطرح کرد: ۱. پول و دارایی خانم؛ ۲. اجتماعی بودن خود و خانواده خانم؛ ۳. زیبایی خانم؛ ۴. ایمان و عفت خانم. از جمع بیست و سه نفر، بجز دو نفر همه ملاکهای …
❤1🥰1
اما معیار و ملاکهای انتخاب.....
پنجشنبهها احکام عملی داریم؛ امروز، دوستان پیشنهاد کردند که نحوهای عقد خواندن را یاد بگیرند. استاد گفت که داوطلبانه یکی از دوستان نکاح دیگری را با خانم فرضی ببندد. همگی خشکشان زده بود، بهگونهی که از کوه صدا بیرون میشد ولی از اینها نه. ناچار استاد موضوع را از فرد دیگر به خود فرد عوض کرد؛ یعنی داوطلبانه یکی از دوستان عقد خودشان را بخوانند! باورنکردنی اینجا بود، از بیست و سه نفر، بیست و دو نفر دست شان را بلند کر…
😁3🤓1
آری! شاید اینگونه ذرهی از بعضهای دلتنگی زائران که به حرم آقا نرسیدند، کاسته شود.
👍4❤1
. استادی داشتم كه از كبار اوليای خدا بود ، ميفرمود براي زيارت اربعين پاداشی است كه براي عمل ديگر نيست: «زائر اربعينِ امام حسين (علیه السلام) عاقبت بخير ميشود» اين شامل ما هم كه از راه دور هستیم ميشود. آیت الله فاطمینیا
❤2👍2
شناخت بدون احساس بهعمل نمیرسد، ما عالم بیعمل زیاد داریم اما عاشق بیکار نداریم.
❤2👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @nim_faseleh83. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
برای رشد جمعی اقدامات زیر پیشنهاد میشود، نظر تان قابل قدر است!
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 10 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“نیمفاصله🌱” (@nim_faseleh83), 56 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nim_faseleh83.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.