مرا از کلاغها بپرس از انتظارهای طولانی از نامههای بیجواب از دیوارهای بیپنجره... #نیلوفر_حسینی_خواه @niloofarhosseinikhah
❤5

Channel
@niloofarhosseinikhah
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
351subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001008732212 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @niloofarhosseinikhah |
| Created | Between 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/niloofarhosseinikhah |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 11:38 | 351 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:17 | 353 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:23 | 353 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 24 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (24 February 2026 – 1 August 2026) |
| Views total | 142 |
| Reactions total | 12 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 21:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
128 reactions across 19 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 93.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 119 | 93.0% | |
| 🕊 | 6 | 4.69% | |
| 💔 | 2 | 1.56% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.781% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 128reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 February 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @niloofarhosseinikhah. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 February 2026 to 1 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
مرا از کلاغها بپرس از انتظارهای طولانی از نامههای بیجواب از دیوارهای بیپنجره... #نیلوفر_حسینی_خواه @niloofarhosseinikhah
❤5
حافظهام درد میکند از سنگینیِ خاطرات درشت از اتفاقهای نیفتاده آرامشم تیر میکشد بغضهایم لبهی پرتگاه ماندهاند و چشمهایم خیره به چراغهای جایی نامعلوم جلوتر نیا! سرزمین سکوتِ من میدان مین است #نیلوفر_حسینی_خواه @niloofarhosseinikhah
❤7
Posted without readable text
تو مانوسترینی و اُنس گرانبهاست الماسی نایاب از اشک و لبخند جمعیتِ احساس و زمان اُنس یعنی ضربان قلب کسی را از بر بودن و تو مانوسترینِ منی #نیلوفر_حسینی_خواه @niloofarhosseinikhah
❤7
یه کم سخته برام از غصهها گفتن یه کم سخته حقیقت رو پذیرفتن سکوت من فقط از روی عادت بود همین خوبه که میشه با تو راحت بود کنارت قلبم از غربت نمیترسه همین احساس آرامش برام بسه #نیلوفر_حسینی_خواه @niloofarhosseinikhah
❤6
دارم نگات میکنم، وایسادی تو مسیرِ باد مبیندی کولهبارتو، من نفسم بند میاد تو چمدونِ رفتنت، جا مونده قلب من، ببین میبری آرامشمو، دوباره میخورم زمین #نیلوفر_حسینی_خواه @niloofarhosseinikhah
❤7
فقط ببین چقد باهات راحتم که میشکنم غرورمو واسه تو تو بیشتر از همه شبیه منی اما نشون نمیدی احساستو اگه یه روزی حرف رفتن زدم برای موندن بهم اصرار کن ما خیلی لحظه هارو با هم بودیم خاطرههای خوبو تکرار کن @niloofarhosseinikhah
❤8
خوب شد آمدی وگرنه من از کجا قرار بود بفهمم که یک نفر را میشود انـــقدر دوست داشت! #نیلوفر_حسینی_خواه @niloofarhosseinikhah
❤11
تو را دیدم و بهارم آغاز شد تو را دیدم و نفسهای زندانی از پشت بغضهای صبورِ ناشکسته میان بازوان آشنایت روان شدند... #نیلوفر_حسینی_خواه @niloofarhosseinikhah
❤11
منو صدا کردی، همین لحظه فصل جدیدِ خاطراتم شد بین زمین و آسمون بودم دستای تو چتر نجاتم شد ✨♥️ #نیلوفر_حسینی_خواه @niloofarhosseinikhah
❤5🕊1
توضیح دادن، نشانهی ضعف نیست. این یکی از اشتباهترین باورهاییست که انسانها را وادار میکند با هزار حرفِ ناگفته و هزار نقطه تاریک و سوال بیجواب، تنها برای آنکه “ضعیف”به نظر نرسند، سکوت کنند و فاصله بگیرند. در حالی که توضیح دادن، در بسیاری از مواقع، نشانهی اطمینانیست که به خودت داری. اینکه بتوانی بایستی، حرف بزنی و برای نتیجهی دلخواهت لااقل تلاش کنی، نه آنکه صرفا راهِ گریز را انتخاب کنی، از قدرت است نه ضعف.…
❤7🕊1😢1
سالها میان و میگذرن. میفهمی، میپذیری، پوست میندازی، رشد میکنی، و بعد میبینی زیر درخت هزار شاخهی زندگی، درست از لحظهای که دیگه دستتو به سمت میوهی سمی و پوسیده روی شاخهی شکستهای که زخمیت میکرد دراز نکردی، وقتی رفتی عقب، دست کشیدی از هرچی بهش اصرار داشتی، و گذاشتی این درخت کار خودشو بکنه، از شاخه های بالاتر، چیزی که درسته و لایقشی، لای حریر و نور، بی هوا میاد میون دستات. اونوقته که به جای تقلا و بیقراری در سکون و …
❤8🕊2💔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @niloofarhosseinikhah. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“نیلوفر حسینی خواه” (@niloofarhosseinikhah), 351 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/niloofarhosseinikhah.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.