3 measurements spanning 9 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 226–227 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Aug 2026, 08:06
226
-1
7 Aug 2026, 18:34
227
no change
7 Aug 2026, 07:47
227
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 20 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
40.9%
avg views ÷ 226 subscribers
Avg views / post
92.5
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.49%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held
20 (20 February 2026 – 2 August 2026)
Views total
370
Reactions total
24
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 07:47 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
115 reactions across 19 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
104
90.4%
👏
4
3.48%
🤩
4
3.48%
🕊
2
1.74%
😢
1
0.87%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 115reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 February 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
چیزی را جستوجو کردن
همیشه یافتن چیز دیگری است.
پس برای یافتن چیزی
باید به جستوجوی آنچه نیست، بروی.
پرندهای را جستجو کردن، گل سرخی را یافتن،
عشق را جستجو کردن، تبعید را یافتن،
هیچ را جستوجو کردن، انسان را شناختن،
به عقب رفتن برای پیشروی کردن.
رازِ راه نه در فرعیهایش،
نه آغازِ مشکوک
و پایانِ تردیدآمیزش،
که در طنز گزندهی
دو طرفههایش است.
همیشه میرسی
ولی به جایی دیگر
همهچیز میگذرد
اما در دیگر سو.
روبرتو خو…
از راه که رسیدم، ماهان با ذوق اومد جلو و بهم گفت «خانم من امروز برای شما یه هدیه دارم.»
هدیهش این کار مفهومی بود که اجرای داستان «شکارچی فکرهای خوب»ه. ماهان برامون توضیح داد این یه ذهن سبزه که توش فکرهای خوب زیادی روییده؛ البته بینشون فکرهای بد سیاه هم هست، اما فکرهای خوب فضای بیشتری دارن.
حسابی غافلگیر شدم...
خوشحالم این داستان با فرارفتن از کلیشهها به بچهها یادآوری کرد فکرهای بد هم هستن و گاهی دونستن همین ح…
باید اعتراف کنم دوست داشتم جای آن که فردا قصهگوی بچههای خانهٔ قصه باشم، کسی امشب برای من قصهای بگوید که بتواند یک آدمبزرگ را خواب کند.
چرا از کودکی حقیقت را به ما نگفته بودند؟ نکند من هم در دروغ قصههای خوب شریکم!؟ و عجیب که خاصیت تسکینبخش و خوابآور آن افسانهها هنوز هم وسوسهام میکند که بشنوم.
#نیلوفر
#اعتراف
@niloofarbakhtyari
فکرشو میکردین تیتراژ خانهبهدوش، در اصل یک آهنگ عربی عاشقانه باشه؟ خیلی زیباست؛ گفتم شمام بشنوین.
عادت دارم ترجمهٔ آهنگهای عربی محبوبمو انقدر میخونم تا بهش مسلط بشم. خوبه که اینجا هم بخشی از متن عربی و ترجمهٔ فارسیش بمونه:
اتطلع في، با صدای کارول سماحة
اتطلع في هيك
هودي مش عينيك
هيدي مش لمساتك يا حبيبي
ومش ايديك
به من نگاه کن
اینها چشمان تو نیست
این نوازش دستان تو نیست
و دستان تو نیست
في شي عم بغيب
انا ع…
کارگاه «ساعت آبیِ قصه»، در خانهٔ قصهٔ اودلاجان، به احترام #هوشنگ_مرادی_کرمانی برگزار میشود.
تابستان ۱۴٠۵، هر یکشنبه دور هم جمع میشویم تا قصه بخوانیم. فردا سری میزنیم به هزارتوی داستان «پرواز» از #احمدرضا_احمدی. بعد چند #کاریکلماتور از مجموعهشعر «دمپایی خورشید» حسین تولایی را با هم میخوانیم و دربارهٔ اینکه «کاریکلماتور چیست» حرف میزنیم. حتی شاید چند تا کاریکلماتور با هم ساختیم.
رده سنی: کودکان ۹ تا ۱۲ سال
ح…
⭕ *پاسداری از زیستبوم در آیینهای کهن*
🔹 آب، باران، درخت و زمین؛ چهار رمزگانی که در اسطورهها و آیینهای کهن ایرانی نقشی فراتر از عناصر طبیعی دارند. در این یادداشت با مرور روایتهای تیشتر، سیاوش، چنار و آیینهای بارانخواهی نشان داده میشود که نیاکان ایرانی، قرنها پیش حفاظت از طبیعت و منابع آب را در قالب اسطوره، جشن و باورهای مردمی به نسلهای بعد منتقل کردهاند.
این یادداشت را اینجا بخوانید👇👇
https://kheiriran.ir…
پنجشنبه ۱۴ خرداد ۱۴۰۵ ساعت ۱۴ تا ۱۵
پنجشنبههای قصه و روایت در خانهٔ قصه اودلاجان بهاحترام هوشنگ مرادی کرمانی برگزار میشود.
پنجشنبهها ساعت ۱۴ تا ۱۵ همراه با مربی و تسهیلگر: نیلوفر بختیاری
حضور و ورود برای عموم کودکان آزاد و رایگان است.
رده سنی کودکان ۹ تا ۱۲ سال
@niloofarbakhtyari
❤6
Signed نیلوفر بختیاری
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @niloofarbakhtyari. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“سورهٔ نیلوفر” (@niloofarbakhtyari), 226 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/niloofarbakhtyari.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
