Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝒩

Channel

𝒩

@nila8813

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

201subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002166679939
TypeChannel
Username@nila8813
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded15 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/nila8813

Growth

20020220115 August 2026 — 202 subscribers15 August 2026 — 202 subscribers16 August 2026 — 201 subscribers23 August 2026 — 200 subscribers29 August 2026 — 201 subscribers15 August 202629 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 14 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 200–202 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 07:13201+1
23 Aug 2026, 07:46200-1
16 Aug 2026, 20:18201-1
15 Aug 2026, 17:00202no change
15 Aug 2026, 16:45202first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.1%
avg views ÷ 201 subscribers
Avg views / post
24.3
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held20 (13 August 202615 August 2026)
Views total486
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 17:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 16:48 UTC4 viewsread 15 August 2026

نشد دیگه باید میرفتم، موندن من چیزی رو درست نمیکرد، بعضی وقت‌ها همین میشه همه وجودت میخواد بمونه، دلت گیر کرده، حتی اگه بمونی حالت بهتره، ولی باید جمع کنی بری طوری بری که انگار هیچوقت نبودی و هیچ راه برگشتی نداشته باشی، من هم باید میرفتم انگار هیچوقت نبودم.

Signed nili

15 Aug 2026, 14:19 UTC13 viewsread 15 August 2026

زندگی که منو انقده گاییده غار حرا شدم

Signed Hadi

15 Aug 2026, 13:22 UTC15 viewsread 15 August 2026

لازم نیست زندگی را بفهمی فقط باید آنرا زندگی کنی

Signed Sepi

14 Aug 2026, 20:20 UTC37 viewsread 15 August 2026

خیلی دلمو شکوندی؛ امیدوارم هر چی می‌خری فرداش آف بخوره، بیسکوییتت بیوفته تو چایی، ماشینتو هر وقت می‌بری کارواش بارون بزنه و باریستای کافه جای صد عربیکا، صد روبوستا بزنه تا از تپش قلب سکته کنی و در نهایت بمیری.

Signed nili

14 Aug 2026, 17:23 UTC29 viewsread 15 August 2026

اگه قراره خودمو بهت یادآوری کنم، فراموشم کن.

Signed nili

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @nila8813. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

DJ AlirezA | دیجی علیرضا
@DjAlirezA · 103,129
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝒩” (@nila8813), 201 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nila8813.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.