Channel
@nikitaivena
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
655subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001628054403 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nikitaivena |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nikitaivena |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 06:54 | 655 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:26 | 656 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:46 | 654 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:09 | 654 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
140 reactions across 5 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 48 | 34.3% | |
| 👍 | 34 | 24.3% | |
| 🔥 | 26 | 18.6% | |
| 😁 | 25 | 17.9% | |
| 🤩 | 3 | 2.14% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 2.14% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 0.714% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 140 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nikitaivena. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 6 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 July 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Я сейчас в отпуске в Германии. Мне уже почти начали нравиться Берлин и эта страна, чудесно ходил на турнички и попробовал много новых классных продуктов, но тут я поехал на Дойче Бан, застрял посреди нигде, планы на день испорчены. Шел лёгкий дождь. Контролер по громкой связи сказал, что сильная гроза. Якобы, из-за неё сначала 10 минут стояли у неисправного переезда, ещё 40 минут через пару станций из-за неисправной …
😁21🤩3🥰3
Похоже на творчество Хундертвассера, но нет! Это Арик-Брауэр-хаус (1991-1994), фасад и интерьеры которого спроектированы художником, в честь которого он назван, а вот сам дом спроектирован Петером Пеликаном, который сотрудничал с Хундертвассером на других проектах. На фасаде два плиточных панно, символизирующих "борьбу за гармонию". Внутри также украшены входные зоны, лестницы и даже ванные покрыты особой плиткой. Те…
❤15🔥6👍3
Знаете, что у жителей Вены есть свой диалект немецкого? Называется Wienerisch. Это и отдельная лексика - слова Servus, Oida, Palatschinke, и особое произношение - сильное сокращение слов, смягчение согласных и певучая интонация (I hob a bisserl net verstehen. Wos?). Считается, что он образовался под влиянием других народов, прибывавших в Вену в эпоху Австро-Венгрии. Много заимствований, славянская певучесть. Здесь да…
👍14😁4❤2🔥1🤣1
Вам какой перегон больше понравился?
The shares total 121%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Обожаю венский Штадтбан за красивейшие архитектурные виды из окна, пока едешь в поезде. Тут Топ-5 классных перегонов между станциями с великолепным обзором. 1. U6 Nussdorfer Strasse - Währinger Strasse. Аутентичная застройка эпохи Грюндерства, ничего не поменялось за 100 с лишним лет. Сначала видим старинное трамвайное депо с конторским зданием и затем ряды жилых домов эпохи Австро-Венгрии. 2. U6 Nussdorfer Strasse -…
🔥12❤7👍4
Редко стал писать, стрессовые выдались недели. А теперь еще и плотно приступил к написанию бакалаврской работы, посвященной устойчивой функциональности социальных жилых комплексов в Неаполе, Марселе и Глазго. И один из них в Вене. Жилой комплекс Trabrenngrunde (арх. Фриц Герхард Маер, Манфред Шустер, 1973-1977) построен на бывших землях ипподрома (его название так и переводится - "Земли ипподрома") - самый крупный му…
❤24👍13🔥7
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @nikitaivena. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Вам какой перегон больше понравился?
The shares total 121%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Никита и Вена” (@nikitaivena), 655 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nikitaivena.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.