сюда завезли opus 5

Channel
Nikita Corexid
@nikit2a
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry
36subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002769985110 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nikit2a |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 10 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nikit2a |
Topic
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 30 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 36% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 19:55 | 36 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:01 | 37 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:21 | 37 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 22 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
122 reactions across 15 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👎 | 52 | 42.6% | |
| ❤ | 18 | 14.8% | |
| 🥱 | 16 | 13.1% | |
| 🍾 | 9 | 7.38% | |
| 👏 | 7 | 5.74% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 3.28% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 3.28% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 2.46% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 1.64% | |
| 🤨 | 2 | 1.64% | |
| custom 5237878025252511876 | 1 | 0.82% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.82% | |
| 👾 | 1 | 0.82% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.82% | |
| 😎 | 1 | 0.82% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 122 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 22 May 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Кстати , кому нужна подписка на любую ИИ Пишите @corexidn
❤1
В Cursor появился мощный режим автоматического выбора модели под задачу Фичу назвали Router. Нужно просто выбрать Auto mode и задать параметр оптимизации: качество, стоимость или баланс. Система будет анализировать каждый запрос и перенаправлять его наиболее подходящей модели. Разработчики утверждают, что с помощью режима можно здорово сэкономить без просадки по качеству. Смотрите первый график: это A/B на реальном…
🔥1
может стоит начать продавать подписки на claude, gemini , chatgpt? за каждого приглашенного друга будет скидка на подписку(какая решу потом)
завозик по free ИИ UNITY После регистрации дают $2, есть полноценный GPT-5.6 SOL, расход токенов идёт с коэффициентом 0.4×. Также доступны модели Anthropic и реферальная программа с выплатой $5 за каждого приглашённого.
❤1🍾1👏1👾1
убрали кредиты за рефералку ((
❤2⚡1😁1
Вышел новый GPT-5.6 Sol ))
❤1👍1💯1🔥1
GPT-5.6 выходит уже сегодня – официальный анонс от OpenAI Все три модели выйдут одновременно. В линейке, напоминаем, будет: 1. Sol, самая крупная и мощная, примерно на уровне Mythos, и при этом дешевле в два раза. 2. Terra, промежуточный вариант. Уровень Opus 4.8. 3. Luna, самый дешевая и быстрая модель. Тем временем уже сейчас стартап расширяет превью доступ. Так что некоторые счастливчики могут попробовать мод…
❤1😁1
Nikita Corexid pinned «free fable 5 «тык»»
GPT-5.6 Sol появится в Codex уже со дня на день Да, модель будет в Codex, это подтвердили сотрудники. Вместе с братьями своими меньшими Terra и Luna, она, по слухам, должна выйти уже завтра-послезавтра. Готовимся вайб-кодить на полную. Но это еще не самое интересное. Самое интересное, что в ограниченный тест в июле выложат GPT-5.6 Sol на Cerebras. Обещают скорость (внимание!) до 750 токенов в секунду. При этом эт…
👏1🔥1😎1🙏1
free fable 5 «тык»
❤4
если выбрали «свой вариант» , пишите в комментарии их
❤2🤨2🔥1🙏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @nikit2a. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
скоро будет что-то новенькое , о чем я ранее говорил
- Больше реверс-инжиниринга и декомпиляции (софт/прошивки)40%
- Практический бэкенд и системное программирование10%
- Железо, эмбеддед и микроконтроллеры (DIY изнутри)10%
- Интеграция нейросетей (LLM) и автоматизация (боты)40%
- Архитектура проектов и разбор чужого «грязного» кода20%
- Свой вариант30%
The shares total 150%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 22 May 2026 to 27 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Nikita Corexid” (@nikit2a), 36 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nikit2a.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.