Channel
@nikatalks
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
70subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001397664266 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nikatalks |
| Description | all things pop and corny // social media editor x openface dm @nikukusshka letterboxd https://boxd.it/5rj7P |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nikatalks |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:00 | 70 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:51 | 70 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 15 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 9 (15 May 2026 – 30 July 2026) |
| Views total | 116 |
| Reactions total | 10 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 00:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
62 reactions across 9 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 28 | 45.2% | |
| ❤🔥 | 14 | 22.6% | |
| 🍓 | 12 | 19.4% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 6.45% | |
| 😭 | 3 | 4.84% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 1.61% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 62reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 15 May 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
сегодня думаю о мейкапах и стильке в margo’s got money troubles есть в нем что-то свежее и не избитое, хочется любоваться и вдохновляться, как когда-то первым сезоном «эйфории» (не побоюсь этого сравнения)
❤🔥5
Вижу много негатива на счет «Одиссеи» Нолана, и большинство замечаний кажется мне неоправданным. Но есть один момент, который меня действительно разочаровал — это появление Зендеи в украшениях из Ирана в Лондоне. https://vm.tiktok.com/ZN81XSNwL/ Для многих, включая меня, это выглядит как чудовищное проявление колониального отношения к культурному наследию: страну разграбили, древние артефакты растащили, а теперь их…
❤5
🧚✨💘🍃 новый альбом попадает все глубже в сердечко с каждым новым прослушиванием
🍓5❤1🔥1
be right back, пересматриваю выступление Люка Эванса в образе доктора Фрэнк-эн-Фертера с премии Тони… ну как он хорош!
❤6❤🔥2
если бы по последним трем прочитанным книжкам составляли психологический портрет.. я даже не знаю, наверное, лучше не надо
❤3🔥1
когда уже казалось, что экранизация «эвелин хьюго» осталась похоронена и забыта году этак в 2021-м, Анна Кендрик пришла сделать ей искусственное дыхание Анну люблю и такому выбору рада хотя бы только из-за персоналити — её режиссерский дебют вспоминаю, как уверенное «норм» надеюсь, что нетфликс отсыпал достаточно денег на мини-сериал
❤5🔥2❤🔥1
пока готовлюсь сесть за хейт-вотч финала «эйфории», использую в качестве антистресса новую съемку Алексы Деми от Петры Коллинз, заодно фантазируя о том, какую эйфорию мы потеряли petra collins = slonyara
🍓7
парочка интересных фактов из famesick: - а вы знали, что в girls могли играть элизабет олсен и дакота джонсон? - а то, что финальная сцена фильма frances ha была снята в квартире лены данэм? кроме всего прочего, мне кажется важным отметить: famesick — это ещё и очень смешно (как и сериал girls, частенько смешно и печально, неловко, странно одновременно) доказательства прикладываю
❤6😭3🤯1
мемуары Лены Данэм я скачала, как только увидела анонс их публикации, несмотря на то, что фанаткой или даже стабильной наблюдательницей карьеры Лены Данэм я не могу себя назвать во-первых, меня интересовали сплетни (кто сам без греха, пусть первым бросит камень, коллеги) — выходки Адама Драйвера на площадке girls, отношения с Джеком Антоновым и их завершение, новые для меня факты про Джемайму Керк и, может быть, даж…
❤🔥6❤2
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @nikatalks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“popcorny” (@nikatalks), 70 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nikatalks.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.