Channel
@nikahych
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
341subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003683987131 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nikahych |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nikahych |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 06:43 | 341 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:32 | 345 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:47 | 345 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (3 July 2026 – 22 July 2026) |
| Views total | 2,270 |
| Reactions total | 52 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 21:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
329 reactions across 18 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 106 | 32.2% | |
| ❤ | 99 | 30.1% | |
| 💯 | 33 | 10.0% | |
| 💘 | 32 | 9.73% | |
| 🔥 | 21 | 6.38% | |
| 🤡 | 14 | 4.26% | |
| 👎 | 9 | 2.74% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 2.13% | |
| 🥱 | 2 | 0.608% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 0.304% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.304% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.304% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 0.304% | |
| 🤨 | 1 | 0.304% | |
| 🤷♂ | 1 | 0.304% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 329reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 22 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Женщина, придерживающаяся феминистских взглядов, не подходит для брака, даже если она религиозна. Ведь религиозность измеряется не только частыми постами и ночными молитвами. Она проявляется и в принятии велений Аллаха, исполнении прав мужа и понимании семейной жизни такой, какой ее установил Аллах. Среди наиболее характерных черт такой женщины: - Считает себя не женой, а равноправным партнером. - Воспринимает посл…
🔥12❤9👍5💯2
Дорогая сестра, для того чтобы семья была счастливой, совсем не обязательно, чтобы муж и жена одинаково мыслили или всегда были согласны друг с другом. Расхождения во мнениях - это естественная часть человеческой природы. Но чтобы эти расхождения не превращались в постоянные ссоры, обиды и конфликты, которые лишают семью спокойствия и душевных сил, Аллах установил мудрый порядок семейной жизни в виде закона о главен…
❤8👍7💘5🤡3🤣1
От 'Умара ибн аль-Хаттаба (да будет доволен им аллах) передаются следующие слова: النِّسَاءُ ثَلَاثَةٌ: امْرَأَةٌ هَيِّنَةٌ لَيِّنَةٌ عَفِيفَةٌ مُسْلِمَةٌ وَدُودٌ وَلُودٌ تُعِينُ أَهْلَهَا عَلَى الدَّهْرِ وَلَا تُعِينُ الدَّهْرَ عَلَى أَهْلِهَا وَقَلَّ مَا يَجِدُهَا، ثَانِيَةٌ: امْرَأَةٌ عَفِيفَةٌ مُسْلِمَةٌ إنَّمَا هِيَ وِعَاءٌ لِلْوَلَدِ لَيْسَ عِنْدَهَا غَيْرُ ذَلِكَ، ثَالِثَةٌ: غُلٌّ قَمِلٌ يَجْعَلُهَا اللَّه…
❤9🔥8👍4🤡1
Как распознать феминистку, скрывающуюся под образом религиозной мусульманки? Отметьте, встречаются ли у человека следующие признаки. 1 - Стремится к публичности. Постоянно ведёт блоги, активно продвигает себя в соцсетях и регулярно высказывается на темы отношений между мужчиной и женщиной. 2 - Постоянно спорит с мужчинами. Практически любые общественные вопросы превращает в противостояние мужчин и женщин. 3 - …
❤13👍9💯4💘3
Если говорить о тех вопросах, которые должны поставить точку в выборе той или иной кандидатуры на роль вашей супруги, то наверное их всего три: 1 - Согласна ли она с тем, что женщина должна полностью подчиняться своему мужу во всем, что не противоречит нормам Шари'ата? 2 - Согласна ли она с тем, что руководящую роль во всех вопросах занимает именно супруг и нет никакого равноправия или партнерства или компромисса?…
❤20👍6🤡4💘2💯1🔥1
Самый шаткий брак: брак основанный на сильных чувствах
👍12🥱2❤1💘1
Ошибки в частных вопросах указывают на наличие ошибок в основах, как гласит известное правило. Я вижу что женщина сегодня не совсем понимает (если она себя позиционирует как мусульманка) зачем она выходит замуж и что это предполагает, какие пункты входят в этот контракт. Отсюда и бывает это: - Муж меня ограничивает - Я что, твоя собачка? - Мне хочется развиваться И все в этом духе А вот если понимать что такое «…
👍3❤1💘1
А какое представление о «браке» у многих из них в голове - можете посмотреть в том же инстаграме. Их представление - это то, что принято показывать гоям, но чего не бывает в реальности. В лучшем случае это бывает в кино, и то не так красочно.
👍4❤1💘1
Это как знаете «хочу выйти замуж за студента и уехать в Каир» Когда это пишет какая-то выросшая в тепличных условиях девушка, становится очень смешно. Так как если ей удастся выйти замуж за студента и уехать в Каир (оставим формулировку как есть) 1 - Сперва она будет в шоке от того, как выглядит этот самый Каир и что он из себя представляет 2 - Потом от условий жизни в этом Каире 3 - Потом от того как много врем…
💯4❤1💘1😁1
Если это конечно будет серьезный учащийся, а не этот додик с зализанными волосами, который записывает ролик при грамотно настроенном свете, отработав свой голос и загадочно гядя в камеру, обращаясь к очередной «жертве правильного призыва»
👍8❤2💘2😁1
Немного неточно, но достаточно чтобы уловить разницу
👍2❤1💘1
Различия выглядят примерно так
❤7👍2💘1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @nikahych. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 980,171 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Никяхыч” (@nikahych), 341 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nikahych.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.