Channel
@nigthmare_catcher
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
446subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002165578105 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nigthmare_catcher |
| Description | Здесь о "Ловце кошмаров" – хорроре, изданным "Черным-Бело", моей новой фантастике "Я (не) навсега" и писательских ивентах Ищу авторов в клуб @Raven_Darkwind Новая книга и рассказы на Бусти https://boosty.to/valik_writes |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nigthmare_catcher |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:30 | 446 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:16 | 446 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 11 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (11 June 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 974 |
| Reactions total | 36 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 00:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
154 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 65 | 42.2% | |
| ❤ | 63 | 40.9% | |
| 💔 | 13 | 8.44% | |
| 💅 | 5 | 3.25% | |
| 🤯 | 4 | 2.60% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 1.30% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 1.30% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 154reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 11 June 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Большое спасибо, что прошли этот путь вместе со мной! Благодаря вам фантастический роман "Я (не) навсегда" будет напечатан. Остались последние шаги вëрстки и заказа тиража, всё остальное уже готово. Собрано 16400 рублей, примерно две трети от заявленной суммы, что станет мне большим подспорьем. Вëрстку завершим до конца следующей недели и отправим книгу на модерацию в сервис "Ридеро", после чего электронная версия …
🔥10
Куда же сходить в выходные?.. Если кто забыл или до сих пор не знал, в воскресенье пройдёт фестиваль издательства 🪶Черным-бело🪶, где будут все его авторы, в том числе и я с "Ловцом кошмаров"! Что там делать? Участвовать в тематических мастер-классах, сыграть в фэнтези-мафию, посетить арт-маркет (там буду я) и встречи с любимыми авторами (и на паблик-токе тоже буду), стать зрителями конкурса косплея, узнать подробно…
🔥8
Название для "Я (не) навсегда"
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Какое расположение названия вам больше нравится? Мне лично то, которое лесенкой, оно как-то динамичнее смотрится. Но тогда под попой Киры слишком пусто... Внизу опрос запилю↓
🤔1
Как и ожидалось, "Я (не) навсегда" не прошла на второй этап питчингов, хотя она во многих отношениях сильнее "Ловца кошмаров". Это вполне понятно, потому что агенты и редакторы не знают, как её продавать. Я тоже не знаю.
💔13😢2❤1🤔1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤7🔥6
Привет, мама, вот я и вернулся с Бессонницы. Спал правда мало, но что делал, не очень помнится. Режим не сбивал, в обед не вставал точно, Был в своём спальнике максимум где-то в полночь. Чего у нас только не было, ты прикинь: Сети не было, воды не было, не видно ни зги. Были порой перебои с электросетью. У меня точно не было никаких сомнительных сексов. Что, эти багровые пятна по всей шее? Да это слепни. Тупо осата…
🔥10❤3💅2
Фестиваль Черным-бело! 😉 Уже освободили 9 августа? А зарегистрировались? Регистрация обязательна! 🖤 🖤 Встречи с нашими авторами, можно будет задать им вопросы и взять автографы, 🤍 арт-маркет, где вы сможете приобрести мерч по нашим историям и красоту, сделанную локальными брендами, 🖤 глэмбот, 🤍 расклады на Таро, 🖤 мастер-классы. 🤍 Вместе послушаем классную исполнительницу, чье имя пока что не скажем 🤭 А еще …
🔥4❤2
Ура! Увидимся на фестивале издательства "Черным-Бело" 9 августа! Я буду участвовать в паблик-токе в 14:15, а остальное время проведу на маркете с мерчем по "Ловцу кошмаров" Если надумаете прийти, не забудьте зарегистрироваться ;3
❤5
Я прогрелась тем, что питчинг ✨последний✨ и отправила "Я (не) навсегда" в бюро "Литагенты существуют". Точнее, его аннотацию, синопсис и первую главу Если увидят потенциал, пройду на второй этап, где буду очно презентовать книгу редакторам издательств. Но с таким неформатом надежды мало, конечно
❤9🔥4🤯4
Писательский клуб ЛитBEST приглашает на читки рассказов в ивент-коммуну "Пу-пу-пу"! Приходите читать свои рассказы (можно главы из книг, стихи в прозе или фанфики, до 15 минут), слушать чужие и обсуждать Ивент пройдёт в воскресенье 28.06, начало в 17.00 Метро Бутырская, точный адрес даëм при регистрации В пространстве надо разуваться, так что возьмите тапочки. Будем пить чай, любые вкусняшки к нему приветствуются!…
🔥7
Вы готовы к социальному попаданческому фэнтези про коммуну? Я тоже нет. Но 5 тысяч есть 5 тысяч
🔥6❤4💅3
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @nigthmare_catcher. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Название для "Я (не) навсегда"
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 11 June 2026 to 9 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 402,041 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ловец Кошмаров 📖 Валентина Белякова” (@nigthmare_catcher), 446 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nigthmare_catcher.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.