Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝐍𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭𝐦𝐚𝐫𝐞 ♡

@nightmare467

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

141subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002399330378
TypeChannel
Username@nightmare467
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/nightmare467

Growth

136141138.57 August 2026 — 136 subscribers7 August 2026 — 138 subscribers8 August 2026 — 138 subscribers14 August 2026 — 141 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 135–142 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 14:18141+3
8 Aug 2026, 23:01138no change
7 Aug 2026, 23:55138+2
7 Aug 2026, 06:02136first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
78.5%
avg views ÷ 141 subscribers
Avg views / post
111
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
13.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held17 (28 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total1,881
Reactions total191
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 23:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 32s
Average length
3m 32s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

191 reactions across 11 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 61902903946898366115026.2%
custom 53958637930309523084724.6%
custom 57760054728846287002412.6%
custom 53934250161109939962211.5%
custom 5420085995536130496189.42%
custom 5456590133765635482147.33%
custom 545399233568155037584.19%
custom 542492218454602620273.66%
custom 545613594526905893510.524%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 191reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
21
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 17 we hold a reading for · 35%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nightmare467. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 21:00 UTC288 views32 reactions3 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤩. 🤩🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🤩 🎀 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩Часы показывают 00:00, а это значит - мне уже 16! Хочу сказать отдельное спасибо моим друзьям и каждому подписчику, кто до сих пор со мной. Для меня это правда много значит, и я безумно рада, что вы рядом! ❤️🎀

custom 542008599553613049614custom 54565901337656354829custom 53958637930309523088custom 57760054728846287001

6 Aug 2026, 18:04 UTC60 views17 reactions5 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🎀Комната выглядит так, будто здесь ураган прошёлся, поэтому замазала… 😅 #примерка

custom 61902903946898366116custom 53934250161109939965custom 53958637930309523085custom 57760054728846287001

6 Aug 2026, 17:12 UTC66 views14 reactions3 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🎀Чуть позже скину фотку с крылышками. Они, кстати, уже давно у меня на неё лежат! 🤩🤩 #примерка

custom 61902903946898366116custom 53934250161109939964custom 54200859955361304964

6 Aug 2026, 12:26 UTC65 viewsread 8 August 2026

🎀Я забрала!!! Чуть-чуть попозже будет примерочка🤩🤩

5 Aug 2026, 22:14 UTC65 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🎀Я ЩАС ОЧЕНЬ РАДА ОКАЗЫВАЕТСЯ РАМИ ПРИШЛА 5 ЧИСЛА, НО МНЕ НЕ ПРИШЛО УВЕДОМЛЕНИЕ Я ЗАВТРА ПЕРВЫМ ЖЕ ДЕЛОМ ПОБЕГУ ЗА НЕЙ И БУДУ ПРИМЕРКУ ДЕЛАТЬ 🤩🤩

custom 54565901337656354824custom 53934250161109939963custom 57760054728846287002

3 Aug 2026, 16:23 UTC439 views42 reactions4 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩🎀𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎 🤩🤩🤩🤩 🌟Пᴩᴀʙдᴀ ʍᴏжᴇᴛ ʍᴇняᴛь ᴄʙᴏй ᴏбᴧиᴋ ʙ ɜᴀʙиᴄиʍᴏᴄᴛи ᴏᴛ нᴀбᴧюдᴀᴛᴇᴧя 🌟 🦷𝑷𝒉/𝒓𝒕-𝑴𝒖𝒏𝒚𝒂 𝑩𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒏𝒌𝒂🦷 #Maria #UminekonoNakuKoroni 🦷

custom 539586379303095230818custom 619029039468983661111custom 539342501611099399610custom 54561359452690589351custom 54565901337656354821custom 57760054728846287001

3 Aug 2026, 16:08 UTC66 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @lady_allicePhoto

Тᴏᴧьᴋᴏ ᴨᴏᴨᴩᴏбуйᴛᴇ хᴏᴛь ᴨᴀᴧьцᴇʍ ᴛᴩᴏнуᴛь Мᴀᴩию и ᴀд иɜ ᴋᴏᴛᴏᴩᴏᴦᴏ ʙы ʙыᴧᴇɜᴧи ᴨᴏᴋᴀжᴇᴛᴄя ʙᴀʍ ᴩᴀᴇʍ. 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 📷 Фотограф – MunyaBusinka 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 #cosplay #ladyallice_cosp #umineko #uminekocosplay #ushiromiya_rosa #wtc #когдаплачутчайки #косплей

custom 53958637930309523086custom 57760054728846287003custom 61902903946898366113

2 Aug 2026, 15:48 UTC83 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ой, спасибо за звёздочки!!🤩🎀

custom 61902903946898366113custom 53958637930309523082custom 57760054728846287001

2 Aug 2026, 13:19 UTC83 views19 reactions3 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🎀Посты честно будут, но чуть-чуть попозже.. Все еще откисаю после феста. Мне еще скоро приедут две рамиэльки, если кому-то интересно как так получилось - поведую. 🤩 изначально я очень хотела быстро её сделать и забила на принцип, что обычно я покупаю только костюмы хорошего качества, в целом мой тоже неплохой.. Но когда я увидела второй костюм.. искра, буря - и я её заказала. так что будет две примерки… и много фотос

custom 61902903946898366118custom 57760054728846287006custom 54249221845460262025

31 Jul 2026, 17:11 UTC82 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤩Ронова теперь 100% летит в косплан: после трейлера она понравилась мне ещё больше, и я очень хочу постараться сделать её сразу, как только она появится в хорошем качестве 🤩 #коспланы

custom 57760054728846287003custom 61902903946898366113

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @nightmare467. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

29 Jul 2026, 20:29 UTCAnonymous Poll12 voters

🎀Было бы вам интересно смотреть за процессом создания крафта или пошива некоторых костюмов?🤩

  1. 🎀Да92%
  2. 🎀Нет8%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 33,821 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝐍𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭𝐦𝐚𝐫𝐞 ♡” (@nightmare467), 141 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nightmare467.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.