Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

niel wigs 💜

@nielwigs

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

116subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002242133396
TypeChannel
Username@nielwigs
Descriptionwig commission inst: https://www.instagram.com/niel.wigs cosplay inst: https://www.instagram.com/saitriniel personal tg: https://t.me/potoybiklyha
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/nielwigs

Growth

1168 Aug 2026, 18:50 — 116 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 05:16 — 116 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 18:509 Aug 2026, 05:16
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 115–117 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 05:16116no change
8 Aug 2026, 18:50116first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 19 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
168
Videos
49
Links
16

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
54s
Average length
27s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

65 reactions across 10 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4467.7%
❤‍🔥1116.9%
💋46.15%
🤩34.62%
11.54%
🍓11.54%
🔥11.54%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 65reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 19 March 2026 to 13 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Jun 2026, 16:04 UTC106 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @adirika_cosPhoto

Побачила ще фото зі сцени, походу 1 кадр був найзручніший для фотографів, бо далі спіймати мене було щось майже на неможливому🙂‍↔️ Ph

4

8 Jun 2026, 20:37 UTC161 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @potoybiklyhaPhoto

я созрєла на останній пост щодо фанкону. думок багато, але треба з чогось почати! поділю на дві частини хочу ще раз привітати переможців і не можу не показати вам ось цю красу. якщо ви раптом забули, то я вам нагадаю 😉 як вігмейкер я можу сказати «мої перуки виграли фанкон», але зрозуміло, що перука це тільки частина роботи. за кожним образом стоять пошив, крафт і купа вкладених сил. я просто дуже рада, що мої лапк

❤‍🔥42

23 Apr 2026, 12:33 UTC211 views18 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @losttodekyPhoto

Зараз хочу зробити відгук на чудову перуку від Ніель !! Все виконано дуже гарно ,якісно ,швидко ще й подарунки поклали 🥹❤️ А найголовніше ЩО ВОНА СУПЕР МІЦНА . Перука не тільки пережила дуже тиснучий капелюх та маску ВОНА ВЗАГАЛІ НЕ ЗМІНИЛАСЯ🥹 Дуже раджу укладку від цієї чудової майстрині, бо впевнена ви будите задоволені перукою як і я ❤️

11💋4🤩3

21 Mar 2026, 20:26 UTC185 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @svitlunka_tytVideo message

Video message, posted without a caption

5❤‍🔥3🍓1

21 Mar 2026, 20:26 UTC188 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

всім бігти дивитись на кицю метеорологиню!! там ще на каналі більш детальний обзор і перучки і пакування кому цікаво 🙂🥰

3🔥1

21 Mar 2026, 20:26 UTC225 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @svitlunka_tytPhoto

🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 Метеорологиня ✨✨✨ Ось така перша примірка перучки, а вже у вівторок чекайте на зйомку! wig by Niel ✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨

6❤‍🔥41

19 Mar 2026, 14:46 UTC218 viewsread 9 August 2026

дивлюсь на це і ПРОСТОО 🤩🤩🤩🙂🙂🙂🙂

19 Mar 2026, 14:45 UTC178 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @cosplaybusinessPhoto

Так пройшов другий день зйомок. Фан фект - італійці тепер теж знають, що русня хуйня. Навіть у Нормандії на краю світу вони спробували винести нам мізки. Я якось розповім цю історію, але так, тепер всі у експедиції знають фразу «йобана русня»))))) Попри це ми все одно єбанули шедевр і навіть поставили трохи файтингу та зробили кемп Файр. Довелось трошки поплакати, трошки покричати, трошки попиздитись і трошки полаз

2

19 Mar 2026, 14:45 UTC199 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @cosplaybusiness

Пʼяте відео це ще одна реклама ніель, бо перуці було абсолютно поєбать, вона витримала вітер, файт та скалолазання

4

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @nielwigs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“niel wigs 💜” (@nielwigs), 116 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nielwigs.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.