3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 379–380 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 01:04
380
+1
8 Aug 2026, 06:16
379
no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:56
379
first reading
Engagement
9 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
61.1%
avg views ÷ 380 subscribers
Avg views / post
232
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.97%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 9 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
9 (12 July 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
1,625
Reactions total
162
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 06:16 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
193 reactions across 9 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
61
31.6%
🔥
53
27.5%
🎉
28
14.5%
🥰
22
11.4%
❤🔥
11
5.70%
custom 5456254812783910040
9
4.66%
👍
9
4.66%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 193reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 9 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nidel_cosplay. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 9 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Пока нет деняк на ткани решила пока поучиться моделированию на основе теоретического некст проекта
Вывод: С ума сойду через одну секунду от этой вашей топологии.
Мне нравится сидеть учиться и возиться, но оч сложно после рабочего дня продолжать адски думать. Вроде как что-то получается, но при этом хочется бросить ноутбук об стенку и просто это всё заказать. НО НЕЕЕЕЕЕЕЕЕЕЕЕЕЕТ сидим мучаемся
Округлые формы еще в…
А сегодня День рождения уже у меня!
Сегодня мне стукнуло 34.
Я прошел длинный и веселый путь в косплее и надеюсь пройти ещё минимум столько же, поскольку там меня ждет образ Северуса Снейпа и ещё куча крутых дедов.
А вам мои заказчики, желаю побольше денег и творческих идей, которые я помогал, помогаю и надеюсь и дальше буду помогать реализовывать.
Лучшим подарком, был, есть и будет репост работ на прекрасной поду…
Сегодня у меня День рождения ❤️
НАКОНЕЦ-ТО ЦИФРА, В КОТОРУЮ Я МОГУ ПОШУТИТЬ ПРО 300 😈
Очень ценю то, какой большой отклик и сколько позитивных эмоций получаю от вас к своим работам, люблю вас безмерно, спасибо за вашу поддержку 🌟
Тотально не влезаю в узкое зеркало и не понимаю насколько результат удовлетворителен. В любом случае, тадаааааам, дошила штаны на Цири по 4-й части. Наконец взялась за этот костюм.
Из материалов использовала:
1. Замша на скубе
2. Кожзам на трикотаже
3. Случайно влез какой-то плотный кожзам для мебели
На данный момент оч не уверена в выборе материалов и крое данного изделия, поэтому есть шанс что перешью всё с нуля. …
Стащила у Шегги флешмоб #ПервыйПоследнийCos, да еще и фотку вставляю с выступления с ней же, наглёж
Не самая масштабная моя работа, но скилл ощутимо, конечно, вырос. Хотя тоже мне, выпендриваться начала, 10 лет все же прошло. Буквально пол жизни в косплее, а сцена все та же ☠️
как же я рада видеть крутых косплееров в своих костюмах вы не представляете
настроение с утра сразу в сто раз повысилось 😩❤️
когда я тока начинала в середине 10-х годов заниматься этим хобби, то адски засматривалась на её работы, А ТЕПЕРЬ ШО Я ВИЖУ, АААААААА
Ну шо, тикток по замше готов, от ссылочка
https://vt.tiktok.com/ZSXfo1XEX/
Че я хочу сказать. Вообще я записала этот видос с мыслью о том что как-то тут спрашивала будет ли подобный контент по пошиву/крафту вообще полезен и мне тогда ответили типа "дааа это круто, давайдавайурара"
Это не туториал доскональный, но чисто технически полезную информацию подчерпнуть можно. С другой стороны, я вчера во время монтажа дума…
Если у вас тоже вдруг были адские проблемы при сшивании кожи с замшей в виде километровых пропусков ниток, то я засняла сто миллионов процессников как это пофиксить и оч скоро выкачу видос. 🤝
Если шо, то это будет трудно назвать туториалом, просто буду делиться опытом, вдруг кому поможет!
Между первой и второй фоткой буквально сто попыток чтобы оно выглядело хорошо
Просто передо мной сейчас стояло две задачи: соед…
Сегодня мой День Рождение, а значит я совершила level up🎂🎂🎂
За этот год произошло много чего хорошего, много знаковых знакомств, прибавилось много замечательных людей в окружении!❤
Но были и потери.
Впереди ждёт куча всего интересного и я не собираюсь останавливаться!✨ дальше - больше!!!
Желаю себе и близким здоровья, неиссякаемого вдохновения и крутых впечатлений✨✨✨
Никогда такого не делала, но если вдруг кто захоч…
❤5❤🔥2🔥1
Signed Anastasia
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @nidel_cosplay. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Nidel'я косплеит” (@nidel_cosplay), 380 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nidel_cosplay.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.