Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Nicoletta Forcheri

Channel

Nicoletta Forcheri

@nicolettaforcheripubblico

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

937subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001487566366
TypeChannel
Username@nicolettaforcheripubblico
Created15 January 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/nicolettaforcheripubblico

Topic

Science — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

9369429397 August 2026 — 942 subscribers8 August 2026 — 942 subscribers8 August 2026 — 941 subscribers15 August 2026 — 938 subscribers30 August 2026 — 936 subscribers9 September 2026 — 937 subscribers9377 August 20269 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 33 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 935–943 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 17:37937+1
30 Aug 2026, 21:04936-2
15 Aug 2026, 20:48938-3
8 Aug 2026, 13:15941-1
8 Aug 2026, 00:50942no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:43942first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 54s
Average length
1m 57s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

17 reactions across 5 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1058.8%
👍423.5%
👏211.8%
🙏15.88%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 06:12 UTC111 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @VociDallaStradaVideo

L'ESPERIMENTO SULLE PIANTE CHE LA SCIENZA HA SEPOLTO PER 60 ANNI Nel 1966, Cleve Backster, un esperto della CIA, collegò un poligrafo a una semplice pianta... E lì, lo shock: la pianta reagì ESATTAMENTE come un essere umano sotto l'influenza delle emozioni. Peggio ancora: nel momento in cui pensò di bruciare una delle sue foglie (senza nemmeno muoversi), il poligrafo impazzì. Le piante rilevano le intenzioni, le …

❤1

3 Aug 2026, 06:10 UTC87 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Immagini mostrano gli agenti marocchini colpire i migranti che stanno rientrando nel paese. Prima li incitano ad andare ora li perseguitano. È il caos

3 Aug 2026, 06:10 UTC76 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @JosefSternInformazioniLibereVideo

Un "colono" israeliano alla BBC: "Una vita ebraica vale 10 milioni di vite palestinesi." UNISCITI AL CANALE https://t.me/JosefSternInformazioniLibere

3 Aug 2026, 06:07 UTC74 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @BolganStudieSalute

⁣L’Associazione Bolgan Studi e Salute, impegnata nella divulgazione scientifica indipendente sui temi della salute, dell’ambiente e della sicurezza alimentare, invita alla visione della puntata di Camelot – La tavola rotonda per la verità, trasmessa da Radio Roma Television, dedicata al dibattito sul nuovo regolamento europeo relativo alle Nuove Tecniche Genomiche (NGT). La Dott.ssa Loretta Bolgan, ricercatrice scie…

3 Aug 2026, 06:02 UTC90 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @AttiviamociTutti

COVID-19: PERCHÉ LE VERITÀ SCONVOLGENTI CONTENUTE NEI DIARI SEGRETI DI FAUCI RIGUARDANO ANCHE L’ITALIA Enrica Perucchietti Le 1.141 pagine dei diari privati di Anthony Fauci rivelano una pandemia diversa da quella descritta pubblicamente. Mentre si discuteva in privato della possibile origine artificiale del SARS-CoV-2, di una letalità stimata tra lo 0,2 e lo 0,3% e dei limiti dei modelli più catastrofici, agli amer…

29 Jul 2026, 22:37 UTC357 viewsread 8 August 2026

fonte: https://www.conalpa.it/come-evitare-labbattimento-degli-alberi-leggi-e-regolamenti/?fbclid=IwY2xjawTXVvVleHRuA2FlbQIxMABicmlkETBGNUV1V0VVNzFONjVWRXQ1c3J0YwZhcHBfaWQQMjIyMDM5MTc4ODIwMDg5MgABHtFsPb5ko8KGgyJCuHEiyWOhb5wp1yda58q6JYjt4A8phzURRMb28LGcGAEm_aem_9sG0eQ15HT41WJEs4phOtA

29 Jul 2026, 22:37 UTC167 viewsread 8 August 2026

Dopo aver acquisito tutti gli elementi fondamentali, si fa una segnalazione alla forze dell’ordine, in particolare alla polizia municipale o ai Carabinieri Forestali, oltre a mandare per conoscenza tutto il materiale raccolto agli uffici comunali di competenza. In questo caso bisogna ricordare che nei centri urbani i Carabinieri Forestali non hanno competenza e possono intervenire solo in caso di abbattimento o danne…

29 Jul 2026, 22:37 UTC105 viewsread 8 August 2026

Queste distanze non andranno rispettate se sul confine si trova un muro. In tal caso la veduta e la luce delle due proprietà e già limitata e quindi un albero piantato a distanza inferiore non da alcun fastidio. Comunque dovranno mantenersi all’altezza massima del muro in quanto innalzandosi potranno incidere nuovamente in maniera negativa sulla vista e sulla luce del fondo vicino. Questo non vale invece altri di re…

29 Jul 2026, 22:37 UTC126 viewsread 8 August 2026

link https://www.conalpa.it/come-evitare-labbattimento-degli-alberi-leggi-e-regolamenti/?fbclid=IwY2xjawTXVvVleHRuA2FlbQIxMABicmlkETBGNUV1V0VVNzFONjVWRXQ1c3J0YwZhcHBfaWQQMjIyMDM5MTc4ODIwMDg5MgABHtFsPb5ko8KGgyJCuHEiyWOhb5wp1yda58q6JYjt4A8phzURRMb28LGcGAEm_aem_9sG0eQ15HT41WJEs4phOtA Come evitare l’abbattimento degli alberi. Leggi e regolamenti 5 Agosto 2018 conalpa 2 Commenti Legislazione e regolamenti per la gestio…

29 Jul 2026, 22:37 UTC135 viewsread 8 August 2026

Ogni fosso interposto tra due fondi si presume comune. Si presume che il fosso appartenga al proprietario che se ne serve per gli scoli delle sue terre, o al proprietario del fondo dalla cui parte è il getto della terra o lo spurgo ammucchiatovi da almeno tre anni. Se uno o più di tali segni sono da una parte e uno o più dalla parte opposta, il fosso si presume comune. Art. 898 – Comunione di siepi Ogni siepe tra due…

29 Jul 2026, 22:37 UTC95 viewsread 8 August 2026

Gli alberi che ricadono in aree soggette a vincolo paesaggistico sotto tutelati e quindi qualsiasi abbattimento è consentito previo rilascio di una specifica autorizzazione paesaggistica. Dopo l’autorizzazione bisognerà ottenere anche l’autorizzazione comunale. In assenza di autorizzazione paesaggistica l’amministratore può essere denunciato penalmente con obbligo di ripristino dello stato originario dei luoghi. Albe…

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @nicolettaforcheripubblico. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Nicoletta Forcheri” (@nicolettaforcheripubblico), 937 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nicolettaforcheripubblico.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.