ㅤ ㅤ 🖤🖤𝙽𝙾𝚅𝙾 𝙲𝙰𝙽𝙰𝙻! 𝖵𝗂𝗌𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖺 ㅤ 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗇𝗈𝗏𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗍é𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺𝗌 ㅤ 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗀𝖾𝗇𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖭𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗅𝖺, 𝗆𝗂𝗀𝗋𝖺- ㅤ 𝗋𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗎𝗆 𝗇𝗈𝗏𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗅 . ㅤ 𝖠 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗆 𝗌𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗋 𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗇- ㅤ 𝗍i𝗇𝗎𝖺𝗋 𝖺𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝖺𝗇𝗁𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖺 𝖺𝗍𝗋𝗂𝗓 , ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ 𝙲𝙻𝙸𝚀𝚄𝙴 𝙰𝚀𝚄𝙸. ㅤ

Channel
ᅟ ،ᅟ𝖓𝐢𝐜𝐨𝐥𝐚 𖥸 𝖆𝐫𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐯𝐞 ﹗
@nicolately
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
31subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002231442952 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nicolately |
| Description | ᅟ𝒘𝖾𝗅𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖾 𝗍𝗈 𝗒𝗈𝗎𝗋 𝗈𝗇𝖾 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝗈𝗇𝗅𝗒 ㅤ𝗌𝗈𝗎𝗋𝖼𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗋 𝗇𝖾𝗐𝗌 𝖺𝖻𝗈𝗎𝗍 — 𝗂𝗋𝗂𝗌𝗁 ㅤ𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌ㅤ 𝓝𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗅𝖺ㅤ 𝓒𝗈𝗎𝗀𝗁𝗅𝖺𝗇 ! ᅟ#roleplay ᅟ—ᅟ 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗇 𝗌𝗈𝗎𝗋𝖼𝖾 : ㅤ@𝖺𝗅𝗅𝗍𝗁𝗂𝗇𝗀𝗌𝗇𝗂𝖼𝗆𝖼ᅟ𝗈𝗇ᅟ𝗍𝗐𝗂𝗍𝗍𝖾𝗋 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nicolately |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:00 | 31 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 20:47 | 31 | first reading |
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 29 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 41.9%
- avg views ÷ 31 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 13.0
- 3 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 7.69%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 3
- of 14 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (29 June 2026 – 23 July 2026) |
| Views total | 39 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 21:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 710
- Videos
- 126
- Links
- 222
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 18s
- Average length
- 18s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 4947298456608703639 | 1 | 100.0% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Sticker, posted without a caption
ᅟ ㅤ🌐𝓃𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗅𝖺ㅤ 𝒸𝗈𝗎𝗀𝗁𝗅𝖺𝗇ㅤ 𝒶𝖼𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌❗️ ㅤㅤ 𝗻𝗲𝘄𝘀ㅤㅤ➖ㅤㅤ 𝗻𝗶𝗰𝗼𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗹𝘆 ㅤ ㅤ 𝖭𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗅𝖺 𝖢𝗈𝗎𝗀𝗁𝗅𝖺𝗇 with Nick Grimshaw on 'The Dish Podcast' ㅤ ㅤ 🦢❤️🦢🔁🦢↪️🦢📊 ᅟ
custom 49472984566087036391
Sticker, posted without a caption
🎬𝗍𝗁𝖾𝖽𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗅𝖾𝗋𝘀𝗼𝗰𝗶𝗲𝘁𝘆 🎬𝗅𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗌𝗍 𝘂𝗽𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗛𝗢𝗠𝗘 🖇𝗜𝗡𝗧𝗘𝗥𝗩𝗜𝗘𝗪 🖇𝖶𝖧𝖠𝖳 𝖧𝖠𝖯𝖯𝖤𝖭𝖲 𝖠𝖳 𝖭𝖨𝖦𝖧𝖳 🎬🎬 🎬 𝖭𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗅𝖺 𝖢𝗈𝗎𝗀𝗁𝗅𝖺𝗇 𝗌𝖺𝗂𝖽 𝗌𝗁𝖾 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝖾𝖽 𝗐𝗁𝗂𝗅𝗌𝗍 𝗋𝖾𝖺𝖽𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗌𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗉𝗍 𝖿𝗈𝗋 𝖬𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝗇 𝖲𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗌𝖾𝗌𝖾’𝗌 ‘𝖶𝖧𝖠𝖳 𝖧𝖠𝖯𝖯𝖤𝖭𝖲 𝖠𝖳 𝖭𝖨𝖦𝖧𝖳.’ “𝖳𝗁𝗂𝗌 𝗈𝗇𝖾 𝗂𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗅𝗅𝗒 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗌𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅[…]𝖡𝖾𝖼𝖺𝗎𝗌𝖾 𝗐𝖾’𝗋𝖾 𝗄𝗂𝗇𝖽 𝗈𝖿 𝗀𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗏𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝗆𝗈𝗎𝗋𝗇𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗆𝗒 𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗆𝖺 𝗐𝗁𝗂𝗅𝖾 𝗌𝗁𝖾’𝗌 𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗅𝗅 𝗁𝖾𝗋𝖾.” 𝖠𝗇𝗇𝖺𝖻𝖾𝗅𝗅𝖾 𝖣𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗅𝖾𝗋 𝗐𝗂𝗅𝗅 𝖻𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗒𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗐𝗂𝖿𝖾. ᅟᅟ 🤩𝗐𝗐𝗐.𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗱𝗮𝘀𝘀𝗹𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗼𝗰𝗶𝗲𝘁𝘆.𝗰𝗼𝗺
Sticker, posted without a caption
ᅟ ㅤ🌐𝓃𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗅𝖺ㅤ 𝒸𝗈𝗎𝗀𝗁𝗅𝖺𝗇ㅤ 𝒶𝖼𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌❗️ ㅤㅤ 𝗻𝗲𝘄𝘀ㅤㅤ➖ㅤㅤ 𝗻𝗶𝗰𝗼𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗹𝘆 ㅤ ㅤ 𝖭𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗅𝖺 𝖢𝗈𝗎𝗀𝗁𝗅𝖺𝗇 𝗐𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗍𝗍𝖾𝖽 𝗂𝗇 𝖤𝖽𝗂𝗇𝖻𝗎𝗋𝗀𝗁 𝖿𝗂𝗅𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝖺 𝗇𝖾𝗐 𝗆𝗈𝗏𝗂𝖾 titled '𝖱𝗁𝗂𝗇𝗈' | h𝗈𝗅𝗒𝗋𝗎𝖽𝖾𝗀𝗂𝗋𝗅 on 𝗍𝗐𝗂𝗍𝗍𝖾𝗋 “𝖳𝗁𝖾 𝖿𝗂𝗅𝗆 𝗍𝖾𝗅𝗅𝗌 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗌𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗒 𝗈𝖿 𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝖺𝖼𝗁𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍 𝗐𝗁𝗈 𝗁𝖾𝗅𝗉𝗌 𝖺 𝗀𝗋𝗈𝗎𝗉 𝗈𝖿 𝗒𝗈𝗎𝗇𝗀 𝗉𝖾𝗈𝗉𝗅𝖾 𝖼𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗍𝖾 𝖺 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝖺𝗍𝗋𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗃𝖾𝖼𝗍 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗉𝗂𝗋𝖾𝖽 𝖻𝗒 𝗈𝗇𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝖾𝗇𝖺𝗀𝖾𝗋'𝗌 𝖿𝖾𝖺𝗋𝗌 𝖺𝖻𝗈𝗎𝗍 𝖼𝗅𝗂𝗆𝖺𝗍𝖾 𝖼𝗁𝖺𝗇𝗀𝖾 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖿𝗎𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖾…” ㅤ ㅤ 🦢❤️🦢🔁🦢↪️🦢📊 ᅟᅟ
Sticker, posted without a caption
ᅟ ㅤ🌐𝓃𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗅𝖺ㅤ 𝒸𝗈𝗎𝗀𝗁𝗅𝖺𝗇ㅤ 𝒶𝖼𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌❗️ ㅤㅤ 𝗻𝗲𝘄𝘀ㅤㅤ➖ㅤㅤ 𝗻𝗶𝗰𝗼𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗹𝘆 ㅤ ㅤ 𝖭𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗅𝖺 𝖢𝗈𝗎𝗀𝗁𝗅𝖺𝗇 𝖿𝗂𝗅𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗀 ‘𝖮𝗇𝗅𝗒 𝖬𝗎𝗋𝖽𝖾𝗋𝗌 𝖨𝗇 𝖳𝗁𝖾 𝖡𝗎𝗂𝗅𝖽𝗂𝗇𝗀’ 𝖺𝗍 𝖥𝗋𝖾𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗌𝗈𝗇𝗌’ 𝖧𝖺𝗅𝗅 𝗂𝗇 𝖫𝗈𝗇𝖽𝗈𝗇 ㅤ ㅤ 🦢❤️🦢🔁🦢↪️🦢📊 ᅟᅟ
Sticker, posted without a caption
ᅟ ㅤ🌐𝓃𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗅𝖺ㅤ 𝒸𝗈𝗎𝗀𝗁𝗅𝖺𝗇ㅤ 𝒶𝖼𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌❗️ ㅤㅤ 𝗻𝗲𝘄𝘀ㅤㅤ➖ㅤㅤ 𝗻𝗶𝗰𝗼𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗹𝘆 ㅤ ㅤ 𝖭𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗅𝖺 𝖢𝗈𝗎𝗀𝗁𝗅𝖺𝗇 𝗁𝖺𝗌 𝖻𝖾𝖾𝗇 𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗍𝗍𝖾𝖽 𝗐𝗂𝗍𝗁 𝖺 𝖿𝖺𝗇 𝗐𝗁𝗂𝗅𝖾 𝖿𝗂𝗅𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝖲𝖾𝖺𝗌𝗈𝗇 𝟨 𝗈𝖿 ‘𝖮𝗇𝗅𝗒 𝖬𝗎𝗋𝖽𝖾𝗋𝗌 𝗂𝗇 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖡𝗎𝗂𝗅𝖽𝗂𝗇𝗀’ 𝗂𝗇 𝖫𝗈𝗇𝖽𝗈𝗇. ㅤ ㅤ 🦢❤️🦢🔁🦢↪️🦢📊 ᅟᅟ
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @nicolately. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,011,991 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ᅟ ،ᅟ𝖓𝐢𝐜𝐨𝐥𝐚 𖥸 𝖆𝐫𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐯𝐞 ﹗” (@nicolately), 31 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nicolately.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.