Photo, posted without a caption

Channel
二手数字泔水以及更多
@nichoIascw
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
791subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001480064607 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nichoIascw |
| Description | @nicholascw 胡说八道的地方 X ^^ 至少曾经有试图是过 ^^ @nicholascw 又摸鱼看沙雕图 O NSFW内容: @nicholascw_nsfw 黑暗料理存档: @nicholascw_cai 航空为主的摄影分区: @traffic_in_sight 部分个人内容见 @nicholascw@mastodon.social |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nichoIascw |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:33 | 791 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:55 | 791 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 11.9%
- avg views ÷ 791 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 93.8
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (31 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,875 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 15:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈14,800
- Videos
- ≈1,410
- Links
- ≈3,220
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
Photo, posted without a caption
草 建议 answer 打环
Photo, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
raining: jandan.net/t/6181649 OO: 114 XX: 5 开心凯蒂: 链接呢?! OO: 19, XX: 1
raining: jandan.net/t/6181641 OO: 124 XX: 8 chenge0019: 我是塞尔达玩家,什么主线救不救的。 OO: 34, XX: 0 青春疼痛文学男主: 体育老师呢,为什么要做数学 OO: 16, XX: 0
杯面骑士: jandan.net/t/6181711 OO: 157 XX: 8 摸鱼摸到号丢了: 制氟诱惑hhhhh OO: 82, XX: 0 abigc: 这老哥没混过贴吧?化学民科不是没有,我记得早前见过,他们卡的bug是说某些材料被管制买不到,所以只能在思维里模拟化学实验。我当时被震惊的一愣一愣的 OO: 69, XX: 1 shuiqu: 民科不碰化学?化学吧去看一眼?还可以去搜搜科创论坛之类的地方,从怎么用生活中的各种用品制浓硫酸浓硝酸,到手搓偏二甲肼,甚至发射火箭。你没刷到等于没有系列 OO: 28, XX: 0 simplife01: 去年广州一名初二学生在家做化学实验导致爆炸, 眼睛和腹部严重受伤,还截了一只手。 OO: 16, XX: 0 Logic: 蛋友e659236477c1e诺贝尔虽然没经过系统性的教育,但经过系统性的学习,尤其在他爸的工厂上班期间。他所有的研究都是基于前人的成果,进行数百次的实验解…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @nichoIascw. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“二手数字泔水以及更多” (@nichoIascw), 791 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nichoIascw.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.