Photo, posted without a caption

Channel
CMO | Вадим Рязанов
@nicevadims
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Cite this entry
83subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001646640372 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nicevadims |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 5 times, most recently 5 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nicevadims |
Topic
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 27 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 14:08 | 83 | +2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:31 | 81 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:53 | 81 | first reading |
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 29 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 2m 59s
- Average length
- 36s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
95 reactions across 14 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 34 | 35.8% | |
| 😁 | 24 | 25.3% | |
| 🌚 | 11 | 11.6% | |
| 👀 | 7 | 7.37% | |
| ✍ | 6 | 6.32% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 5.26% | |
| custom 5346117566253276549 | 4 | 4.21% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 2.11% | |
| 🤝 | 2 | 2.11% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 95 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 29 December 2025 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 2
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 2
- of 15 we hold a reading for · 13%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nicevadims. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 December 2025 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Мысль из книги
✍5
Хорошо, когда руководство компании, поддерживает начинания маркетингового отдела 😉
🌚1
Video, posted without a caption
👀5
Вопрос "А можно ли обманывать ИИ" – у меня встаёт конкретнее сейчас )) Недавно видел такой вопрос и улыбнулся 🙂 Сейчас сам сталкиваюсь с ограничениями ИИ, которые можно обходить, если писать не правду... Что по этому поводу думаете, можно ли обманывать нейронки?
🌚2
Видели видео, где робот разбирает посылки? Тут, естественно, устроили соревнование между роботом и человеком, чтобы выяснить, кто доставит больше посылок, и победил человек 🧍 Человечество выживет (пока что...)
😁4👍1
Срезка актуальных тем и запросов по соц. площадкам, ИТ и ИИшек. И короткий итог, который выдала мне гемини 👇 А если Telegram завтра — всё? Стратегия 2026: не стройте дом на чужой земле. ТГ — это просто интерфейс, а не фундамент. Мозги — у вас: ИИ-агент должен жить на вашем сервере. Гибкость: Забанят ТГ — за ночь переезжаем в VK Mini Apps или PWA. Автономность: Платформы — расходный материал, данные — ваш главны…
💯3🤝2👏1
🤖 GEO: Как заставить ИИ рекомендовать ваш сайт Раньше мы боролись за место в топ-10 в классических поисковиках. Теперь битва идет за то, чтобы «Алиса», ChatGPT, Perplexity и остальные - назвали именно ваш бренд, отвечая на вопрос пользователя. Это и есть GEO (Generative Engine Optimization). Если вы не попали в контекстное окно нейросети — вас не существует для нового поколения пользователей. Для новых проектов (…
👍6🌚1
Photo, posted without a caption
👍10
😁😆😁 Напомнить, что ИИ может ошибаться, так как они сами это и пишут. Потому в 2026 году, не отключаем мозг, и ведем сами ИИ, а не чтоб нейронка вела тебя 🤝
😁7👀1💯1
Максим, это что за дела? Не совсем понял, почему ворд и приложение используют файлы, которые должны быть обновлены максом? Пропустил, посмотрим что еще напишут )
😁4🌚3
Мне нужно детальнее пообщаться с прорабом... похоже. Только реальными. Потому, как виртуальных рабочих для картинок и видео, я нашел. Есть сомнения в том процессе, что они делают. Может так и нужно отделку внутри контейнерного дома делать?
🌚3✍1👍1👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @nicevadims. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CMO | Вадим Рязанов” (@nicevadims), 83 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nicevadims.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.