Channel
@ngty6688vip
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
66subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003462420413 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ngty6688vip |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ngty6688vip |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 10:45 | 66 | -3 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 07:27 | 69 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 03:12 | 70 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:16 | 69 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:02 | 69 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (17 July 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 69 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 00:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
【8月10日1点整 葡超 波尔图 vs 艾华卡】 波尔图迎来新赛季首秀，主场对阵艾华卡。机构让步达到波尔图-2，属于较深的强势定位。基本面来看，波尔图上赛季以28胜4平2负的成绩夺冠，17个主场14胜3平保持不败，防线仅失6球；艾华卡则排名联赛第11，客场仅取得2胜，攻防数据与卫冕冠军存在明显鸿沟。 交锋层面同样一边倒，波尔图近7次面对艾华卡全部取胜，近两次交手更是3-0、1-0完成双杀。季前波尔图击败阿斯顿维拉并夺得葡超杯，竞技状态和冠军气势均在线。综合数据、主场、交锋及战术体系，本场看好波尔图持续施压，赢球同时具备穿盘机会，进球数倾向3球或以上。 全场让球：波尔图-2 全场大小：大2.5 推荐比分：3-0
【8月9日21:00 酋长杯 阿森纳 vs 多特蒙德】 【赛前重点】阿森纳主场迎战多特蒙德，本场机构给到主队让1球，态度相当明确。阿森纳近6场4胜1平1负，主场近6战同样保持较高胜率，整体攻防稳定性明显占优。反观多特蒙德，近期热身赛表现虽有亮点，但客场近6场仅取得3胜3负，比赛稳定性不足，加上后防及中场存在伤停隐患，面对阿森纳的高强度压迫恐怕难以持续招架。 从实力定位到主场优势，再到数据支持，本场阿森纳均占据上风。酋长杯战意无需多言，预计枪手开局便会主动掌控节奏。综合判断，本场看好阿森纳主场赢球，进球数倾向谨慎，防范2球优势。 全场让球：阿森纳 -1 全场大小：小3 推荐比分：2-0
【8月8日 19:00 中超 青岛海牛 vs 上海申花】 中超第22轮迎来一场焦点较量，机构目前普遍维持上海申花客让1球的数据，市场对于申花反弹依然抱有期待。青岛海牛目前保级形势严峻，每一分都十分关键，因此主场战意毋庸置疑。不过球队赛季至今防守表现并不稳定，面对中前场配置较强的球队时，后场失位和定位球防守一直是隐患。上海申花近期因连续失利完成换帅，毛毅军代理执教后首要任务便是稳住球队士气。从纸面实力来看，申花无论中后场组织还是锋线终结能力都明显优于海牛，本赛季首回合2比0轻松取胜也体现出双方实力差距。 从比赛思路来看，海牛大概率会采取稳守反击策略，而申花更需要主动控球寻找机会。换帅后的首场比赛往往能够激发球队斗志，只要申花减少后防失误，提高进攻效率，拿下比赛的机会依旧更高。我认为本场更倾向于一场节奏相对谨慎的客队胜利，赢球过程或许不会轻松，但结果值得期待。 全场让球：上海申花 -1 全场大小：大3.5 推荐比分：1-3
【8月7日 19点35分 中超 北京国安 vs 深圳新鹏城】 北京国安本赛季表现虽有起伏，但整体实力依然位居中超前列。随着联赛进入冲刺阶段，球队仍需全力争夺前四，本场主场面对深圳新鹏城，抢下三分目标明确。预计法比奥、塞尔吉尼奥、达万、孔特等外援继续首发，搭配张稀哲坐镇中前场，国安在进攻创造力和比赛控制力上占据优势。 深圳新鹏城近期进攻状态有所回暖，反击效率不错，但客场发挥不够稳定，防线面对强队时抗压能力仍显不足。机构维持北京国安让1.5球，对主队支持力度充足。综合双方实力、阵容及主场优势，看好国安主场赢球，但考虑到深圳近期进攻有所改善，国安大胜难度不小，更倾向赢两球左右。 全场让球：北京国安-1.5 全场大小：小3.5 推荐比分：2-0
【8月6日 2点整 欧冠资格赛 费内巴切 vs 格拉茨风暴】 本场欧冠资格赛焦点战，费内巴切迎来格拉茨风暴挑战。从整体实力来看，费内巴切无论阵容厚度还是欧战经验都占据明显优势，球队主场历来战斗力强，面对关键比赛往往能够打出较高竞技水准。格拉茨风暴此前资格赛发挥抢眼，整体进攻效率不错，但近期联赛与欧战连续作战，对球员体能储备形成一定影响，而且客场面对高强度压迫，防守端稳定性仍需接受考验。机构初始开出费内巴切让1.5球，对主队信心较足，结合双方纸面实力、历史交锋以及主场因素来看，费内巴切赢球机会更高，但考虑到资格赛首回合仍需保持谨慎，预计不会出现过大的比分差距。 全场让球：费内巴切-1.5 全场大小：小3 推荐比分：2-0
【8月5日 0点整 欧冠资格赛 米亚尔比 vs 布拉迪斯拉发】 首回合交锋，机构给予主队一定支持，不过市场对于布拉迪斯拉发的关注度同样不低。米亚尔比首次征战欧冠，主场作战固然拥有一定优势，资格赛前两场零封也证明了球队防守执行力较强，但国内联赛持续低迷，暴露出进攻创造力不足的问题。相比之下，布拉迪斯拉发拥有更加成熟的欧战底蕴，连续多个赛季征战欧洲赛事，在比赛节奏控制和关键时刻处理球方面优势明显。图雷执教后球队攻防转换更加流畅，即便锋线减员，中后场依然能够保证比赛强度。考虑到首回合双方都会以稳为主，客队凭借整体实力和经验更有机会掌控局面，看好布拉迪斯拉发客场不败，比赛进球数偏少。 全场让球：布拉迪斯拉发 全场大小：小2.5 推荐比分：1-2
【8月4日 2点30分 英联杯资格赛 约克城 vs 克劳利】 本场比赛数据方面，机构以约克城-0.5/1起步，体现出对主队较高认可。约克城近期整体竞技状态稳定，球队在主场踢法积极，进攻端效率不错，防守端失误控制也较为理想。克劳利近期连续失分，攻防两端表现均不够稳定，尤其后防线漏洞较为明显，客场作战难度进一步增加。双方综合实力对比，约克城目前略占上风，加上主场优势和更好的比赛状态，本场更看好约克城把握机会赢下比赛，顺利晋级下一轮。 全场让球：约克城-0.5/1 全场大小：小2.5/3 推荐比分：2-0
【8月4日 2点30分 英联杯资格赛 约克城 vs 克劳利】 本场比赛数据方面，机构以约克城-0.5/1起步，体现出对主队较高认可。约克城近期整体竞技状态稳定，球队在主场踢法积极，进攻端效率不错，防守端失误控制也较为理想。克劳利近期连续失分，攻防两端表现均不够稳定，尤其后防线漏洞较为明显，客场作战难度进一步增加。双方综合实力对比，约克城目前略占上风，加上主场优势和更好的比赛状态，本场更看好约克城把握机会赢下比赛，顺利晋级下一轮。 全场让球：约克城-0.5/1 全场大小：小2.5/3 推荐比分：2-0
【中超：辽宁铁人VS上海申花，胜负方向与比分预测8月2日19：35 】 本场亚洲数据统一开出上海申花客让0.5，在客场背景下仍维持半球力度，足以体现机构对于客队实力的认可。 虽然双方近期战绩相同，但含金量存在差异。辽宁铁人面对高强度对抗时防线容易出现漏洞，而上海申花整体体系更加成熟，中前场组织能力和定位球威胁均占据优势。 历史交锋方面，申花曾3-1击败辽宁铁人，心理优势明显。从战术匹配来看，申花的控球推进正好克制辽宁铁人的防守反击打法。若盘口后市持续维持客让半球低水，对客胜依然具备较强支撑。 综合基本面、战术克制及盘口倾向，本场更看好上海申花反客为主。 推荐：上海申花-0.5（★★★★☆） 大小球：小3/3.5 参考比分：0-2、1-2
【8月1日 19点30分 香港足球盛会 曼彻斯特城 vs 国际米兰】 数据方面机构整体更倾向曼彻斯特城方向，综合实力及阵容深度均占据一定优势。曼城作为英超豪门，整体控球能力和高位压迫体系成熟，虽然季前热身赛存在一定轮换因素，但预计哈兰德等核心球员仍有望登场，球队整体竞争力依旧占优。国际米兰同样将以接近主力阵容出战，劳塔罗、巴斯托尼、恰尔汗奥卢等核心球员均有望亮相，不过球队面对曼城持续的高压逼抢，防守端将面临不小考验。 综合双方整体实力、近期备战情况以及阵容厚度来看，曼彻斯特城仍更值得高看一线。虽然季前赛下半场大概率会进行较大幅度轮换，但曼城整体优势依然明显，看好其在90分钟内取得胜利。 全场推荐：曼彻斯特城 胜 推荐比分：2-1（防1-1）
【8月3日 03:00 巴西杯 帕尔梅拉斯SP vs 福塔莱萨CE】 本场巴西杯淘汰赛，帕尔梅拉斯SP坐镇主场迎战福塔莱萨CE。从机构给出的指数来看，主队让出1.5/2球，属于本轮较深的让步，对于帕尔梅拉斯的整体实力给予了充分肯定。帕尔梅拉斯本赛季延续了强势表现，球队攻守体系成熟，中前场创造机会能力突出，主场比赛控球率和进攻效率均处于较高水平，面对实力稍逊的球队往往能够早早建立优势。 福塔莱萨虽然整体韧性不错，但球队客场稳定性不足，面对高压逼抢和快速转换时容易暴露防守空档，尤其面对进攻火力强劲的球队，失球率明显提升。此外，双方历史交锋中帕尔梅拉斯同样占据一定心理优势，此役坐镇主场自然希望在90分钟内解决战斗。 综合指数变化、双方近期状态以及整体实力分析，本场帕尔梅拉斯赢球希望极大，只要把握住进攻机会，打出两球以上优势值得期待。 推荐： 全场让球：帕尔梅拉斯SP -1.5/2 全场大小：大2.5/3 参考比分：3-0、4-…
【罗马诺：巴黎清理阵容，穆阿尼和桑谢斯今夏均可离队】 据知名转会记者罗马诺透露，巴黎圣日耳曼正在进行阵容调整，多名球员可能在今夏离开球队。其中，法国前锋穆阿尼以及葡萄牙中场雷纳托·桑谢斯都不在巴黎未来计划之中，俱乐部已经准备处理两人的转会问题。 罗马诺表示，巴黎已经告知雷纳托·桑谢斯，他需要寻找新的球队。经过多个赛季的起伏，这名葡萄牙中场并未完全达到外界对他的期待，巴黎方面希望在今夏推动他的离队。 穆阿尼的情况同样值得关注。这名法国前锋此前从法兰克福加盟巴黎，但在球队竞争激烈的锋线体系中，球员只能辗转外租。罗马诺透露，巴黎愿意听取关于穆阿尼的报价，球员未来存在离队可能。 目前，巴黎圣日耳曼正在围绕阵容进行调整，两名球员的转会动态将在今夏继续受到关注。
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ngty6688vip. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 89,535 of 1,629,403 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“NG体育官方频道” (@ngty6688vip), 66 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ngty6688vip.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.