Channel
@nfxcommunitychannel
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
253subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 24 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001175569864 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nfxcommunitychannel |
| Description | Get FREE Updates and Resources from Nonso (Founder of NFX Capital) Join our community to receive valuable insights and tools tailored for new traders. We focus on building a strong foundation, ensuring you learn the essentials before seeking mentorship. |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 24 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nfxcommunitychannel |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Sept 2026, 21:22 | 253 | no change |
| 24 Sept 2026, 20:17 | 253 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 25 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
6 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 3 | 50.0% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 33.3% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 16.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 December 2025 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
“You Need to Be a Little Insane”. Stay with me. Everyone tells you to be realistic. Ignore them. Success isn’t built by realists — it’s built by the delusional ones who believed they could do what the data said they couldn’t. It’s built by people who ran the same setup a hundred times, got burned ninety times, and still took one more trade the next day — because somewhere between logic and obsession, they knew. C…
Photo, posted without a caption
Massive dump on GU and all XXXUSD pairs at market open. As expected from the quarterly chart.
Wishing y’all a great week ahead 🥂
🔥1
Now on the 1H, i need price to tap into the unmitigated order block (which will be my risky entry) and shift or BMS on the 4H indicating bullish continuation. That will be the safe entry.
USDJPY 4H it's clear as price pushes higher after the rejection off the daily BISI and breaks structure above the PWH, we need internal range liquidity swept if we are to continue higher. current weekly Low and High now becomes are dealing range
USDJPY Daily this is what we are working with. though no new low was form to sweep current daily low, we have a BMS above key liquidity levels. Price also has closed above previous weekly high.
Always great to have a mental conditioning before you enter a trade.
Waiting on EU to make a move. Seeking Buy side liquidity at 1.208
Made a risky entry after I missed setting my limit. 0.8% risk. Going for 6R
Waiting….
Closed for the week. Can’t wait to see how February opens
🔥2👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @nfxcommunitychannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“NFX Community Channel” (@nfxcommunitychannel), 253 subscribers as measured 24 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nfxcommunitychannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.