Channel
@nftgif1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
153subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002348682357 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nftgif1 |
| Created | 7 January 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 31 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nftgif1 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:44 | 153 | -1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:24 | 154 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:31 | 156 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:00 | 156 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 7 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
679 reactions across 12 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5336935501700020695 | 221 | 32.5% | |
| custom 5273942238571804816 | 183 | 27.0% | |
| custom 5246794802560774143 | 137 | 20.2% | |
| ❤ | 62 | 9.13% | |
| custom 5949754986115110625 | 44 | 6.48% | |
| 👍 | 13 | 1.91% | |
| 🔥 | 13 | 1.91% | |
| custom 5237761614458933049 | 6 | 0.884% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 679 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 7 January 2025 to 19 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nftgif1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 January 2025 to 19 April 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🎁 Раздача 500 подарков! — Подпишись на Mike in TON — Поставь любую реакцию ❤️ — Получи подарок в @case 🧼 500 подарков = 500 мест Начинаю раздачу прямо сейчас 🎁
custom 5336935501700020695158custom 5273942238571804816111custom 524679480256077414368
Раздаём куличи? Реакции = дарю халяву 🎁
custom 524679480256077414350custom 527394223857180481622custom 533693550170002069522
Ez Pepe 🎁 Играть — @case_bot
custom 52739422385718048163
Posted without readable text
🚀 Сегодня ночью — новые NFT! Как минимум, говорят инсайдеры. Также сегодня протекла инфа: 1️⃣ «Слили» новые коллекции: 💎, 🤖, 📍, 🍭, 🎇, 🔔, 🎁 2️⃣ Подарки будут доступны каналам 3️⃣ NFT можно будет поставить в статус 4️⃣ Улучшенные подарки можно отправлять в блокчейн (пока с багами) Сегодня не спим, друзья 🥳
custom 594975498611511062518custom 53369355017000206959custom 52739422385718048168custom 52467948025607741431
🤔 Самая дорогая NFT?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
custom 594975498611511062516custom 53369355017000206956custom 52739422385718048165
😂 Раскупили «2025» — подарков нет. Про это я и говорил, агенты байтят, а гои ведутся и скупают, что им скажут. Если сегодня не дропнут, я думаю, стоит ожидать ночью завтра или послезавтра. Не вижу причин больше затягивать. ✅ Канал @nft запущен ✅ Маркетплейсы работают, экосистема очень быстро и активно развивается ✅ Хайп и ажиотаж NFT на пике ✅ Stars более 80% подготовили ✅ Рекордные продажи Pepe поставлены Издеват…
custom 527394223857180481613custom 59497549861151106256custom 53369355017000206955custom 52467948025607741431
🗓 Есть точная дата дропа? Нет и не будет. Никто не знает, а инфа по NDA не выйдет из офиса команды Дурова. 🤖 Заблокируют ботов автопокупки? Нет, это не запрещено платформой программно. Читаем документацию. 🎁 Новые NFT будут после выкупа 🎁 Нет, Telegram не ждёт, пока вы докупите остаток подарков. Сумма покупки Stars растёт каждый день в геометрической прогрессии, им просто выгодно тянуть время. 🛡 Будет ли капча на …
custom 52739422385718048167custom 52467948025607741435custom 53369355017000206955
Подготовил ⭐️ 100,000 к новой партии подарков. Надеюсь, вы тоже пополнили свои балансы. А пока, провожу новую волну закупов через ☺️ Tonnel Bot, очень удобный NFT-маркетплейс. Планирую закупить: • 🎁 Любые 3 модели Pepe • 🎁 TON/BTC/Skibidi кольца Ночью завоза не будет, спим спокойно, друзья 😴
custom 52739422385718048166custom 59497549861151106254custom 53369355017000206953
Mike in TON pinned Deleted message
После выходных.
custom 52739422385718048168custom 53369355017000206957custom 52467948025607741435
Sticker, posted without a caption
custom 52467948025607741437custom 52377616144589330496custom 53369355017000206956
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @nftgif1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🤔 Самая дорогая NFT?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 7 January 2025 to 19 April 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Mike in TON” (@nftgif1), 153 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nftgif1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.