Channel
@nft_mining
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
358subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001768769824 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nft_mining |
| Description | Добро пожаловать в крипто сообщество! 🚀 Трейдинг, криптовалюты и инсайды от команды экспертов. Присоединяйся, чтобы всегда быть в плюсе: 📊 Анализ и прогнозы 📈 Торговые стратегии 💡 Инсайды о новых проектах 🌐 Свежие новости и тренды |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nft_mining |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:35 | 358 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:23 | 358 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 28 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 November 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
82 reactions across 12 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 41 | 50.0% | |
| 👍 | 31 | 37.8% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 4.88% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 1.22% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 1.22% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 1.22% | |
| 🖕 | 1 | 1.22% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 1.22% | |
| 🤮 | 1 | 1.22% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 82reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 28 August 2024 to 19 November 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🪙❗️Страны начнут активно печатать больше денег, чтобы приобрести как можно больше BTC в качестве «стратегического резерва» — CZ. Также он поддерживает взгляды Майкла Сейлора, чья компания недавно приобрела еще 51 780 BTC по цене $88 627.
🤣1
Signed Anton Antonov
👀 Автор законопроекта о создании национального биткоин-резерва США Синтия Ламмис предложила ФРС продать часть золотых резервов для покупки 1 млн BTC (почти 5% эмиссии). Эта сделка обойдется примерно в $90 млрд по текущим ценам. Прежде глава Galaxy Digital Майк Новограц допустил, что создание биткоин-резерва способно подтолкнуть курс криптовалюты до $500 000. Ламмис оптимистично настроена на одобрение ее законопроек…
👍1
Signed Anton Antonov
Что я держу в своем портфеле? BTC ETH PEPE WIF TON NOT ENA DOGE SUI ARB APEX ALEO И еще немного щитков в сети Solana, Tron. Кто думает что уже поздно покупать, поверьте, это только начало.
👍7🔥1
Signed Anton Antonov
+39% на консервативном портфеле за месяц. Туда входят такие активы как BTC, ETH, SOL, TON. Но самое интересное происходит на более рисковом портфеле, где мем-коины очень хорошо себя показывают. Pepe ATH 🚀
❤1
Signed Anton Antonov
Трамп заявил, что Илон Маск и Вивек Рамасвами будут руководить D.O.G.E (Department of Government Efficiency). Совпадение? Не думаю, Doge coin в этом цикле нас всех сильно удивит.
😁3
Signed Anton Antonov
Наконец-то рынок ожил, причем как и в прошлый раз (20 год), все растет очень быстро и без откатов. Делается это специально чтоб люди просто не успевали покупать. И заметьте биткоин обновляет свои максимумы, а СМИ молчат. Почему? Рано еще затягивать свежую кровь, об кого можно закрывать свои позиции. Все только начинается…
👍10
Signed Anton Antonov
Anton Antonov pinned «❗️❗️❗️ Как показала практика, доверять кому то вести свой канал превратилось в сбор рефералов. Теперь здесь буду писать только я и делиться с вами своими мыслями. Буду все исправлять, а от вас мне нужна поддержка. Есть тут кто живой готовый меня поддержать?»
Channel name was changed to «Anton Antonov»
❗️❗️❗️ Как показала практика, доверять кому то вести свой канал превратилось в сбор рефералов. Теперь здесь буду писать только я и делиться с вами своими мыслями. Буду все исправлять, а от вас мне нужна поддержка. Есть тут кто живой готовый меня поддержать?
🔥34👍11👎1🖕1🤮1
Signed Anton Antonov
Чувак залочил 1000 бнб и залутал 143к HMSTR за 3 дня 😂😱
👍1💩1😁1
Signed Heavy
Через 1.5 часа листинг на Байбит.
Signed Heavy
Продал Кати по 0.85 65 баксов получил, что полезного можно с ними сделать чтоб увеличить их? Есть идеи?
Signed Heavy
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @nft_mining. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@nft_mining named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Anton Antonov” (@nft_mining), 358 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nft_mining.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.