Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Скам база в Telegram

Channel

Скам база в Telegram

@nft_banditka

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

14subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002616659618
TypeChannel
Username@nft_banditka
DescriptionПо всем вопросам - @Sedrity
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/nft_banditka

Growth

148 August 2026 — 14 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14 subscribers8 August 202612 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13–15 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 01:4714no change
8 Aug 2026, 06:4514first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 1 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
9
Links
5

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

2 reactions across 1 post, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5256205466748345366150.0%
custom 5319022082166649925150.0%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 1 October 2025 to 1 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 May 2026, 19:26 UTC67 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

@He8ki | 7124605127 - скамила в моем же тгк победителей из разных розыгрышей. @xivkiproof | -1003889260975 - тгк с «пруфами» скамера Так же «ручение» от @harveey0 - тоже всё в комментах Никогда не идите первыми! Пруфы в комментах

custom 52562054667483453661custom 53190220821666499251

29 Apr 2026, 13:14 UTC67 viewsread 12 August 2026

-1003978068026 | @dsdaddasfgds - скам чат + тгк, скамят лудками (юза тгк нету) Возможный владелец тгк 8207246901 | @legensaz Не ведитесь на скам лудки, пруфы в комментах

21 Apr 2026, 11:26 UTC89 viewsread 12 August 2026

Старая схема с заходом на аккаунта, на которую досих пор ведутся, человек написал (@backsp3cee | 856305533 🤡), с предложением по получению нфт, в итоге попросило номер и код что бы войти на аккаунт, жертва не подозревая согласилась и осталась без подарков. Пруфы в комментах

16 Apr 2026, 15:22 UTC136 viewsread 12 August 2026

Тгк (@wqwwxz | 1003768559117) - скам лудки ❤️ Тип (868199832 | @G_forman) купил у меня рекламу на почти пустой тгк, я сделал без вопросов, а потом от подписчика прилетают скрины что его заскамили в лудках. Чуть позже мне написал ещё 1 админ (@jdsjdjdhdh | 6132867646) и тоже попросил купить пиар, гении. Я покрыл от себя скам стоимость (30 звёзд), в следующий раз буду внимательнее смотреть на тгк перед пиаром. Все

15 Apr 2026, 10:31 UTC128 viewsread 12 August 2026

Скам на продажу рекламы, та же ситуация что и до этого, скинул звезды и игнор уже второй день❤️ Тгк - @razdauzvezd Владелец (по идеи) снизу @Nnn222210 - 1750027225 @Vovovolvol - 8455858507 Пруфы в комментах

14 Apr 2026, 14:03 UTC78 viewsread 12 August 2026

@financefinancefinance | 7236225826 - скамит на продаже пиаров, лично пытался купить пиар, оплатил и игнор, позже рассказали что он занимается таким уже долго (считай на постоянке) Все пруфы в комментах

12 Apr 2026, 20:42 UTC150 viewsread 12 August 2026

СКАМ-СХЕМА С МОИМ ПРОЕКТОМ (@Sedrity_Fast)🤡 Мне написала «потенциальная жертва» на скам, какой то незнакомец хочет купить нфт и выдает себя за меня. После чего предоставляет 1 скрин (наверняка от какого то давнего админа проекта), но у него просят больше доказательств. Через время «потенциальная жертва» написала мне (если вы чувствуете что то не ладное, то делайте так всегда), я был шокирован и подумал что мне прост

11 Apr 2026, 19:36 UTC113 viewsread 12 August 2026

@notcontacts - воркает, не дал нфт = угрозы, оски родни и прочая залупа Пруфы в комментах

2 Dec 2025, 16:32 UTC165 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Не выдаёт подарки @Work_tverk 1707052835 @zika777 809970764 https://t.me/nftrobsik 3458470258 https://t.me/otrobsik/ 2392253927 https://t.me/farmchatikstars 2140162438 https://t.me/NFT_Tigros 3008265304 @NFT_tverk 5209759300 ссылка на розыгрыш https://t.me/otrobsik/6671 Времени и условий конца конкурса на посте не стояло - отписался в течении 50 минут Перерозыгрыша не было - висит в инвентаре комментарии постоян

1 Nov 2025, 15:02 UTC160 viewsread 12 August 2026

@nicotine191 - владелец @nicotine192 - тгк Скамит с постами «отдам вам х2 звёзды, кидать в лс» Пруфы в комментах

28 Oct 2025, 17:27 UTC126 viewsread 12 August 2026

@filya_menchik - скам игры в кубики, скамил в моём же чате❤️

22 Oct 2025, 13:02 UTC172 viewsread 12 August 2026

@Festillion - брат типа постом выше Скамит на нфт и тип выше сам за это говорил, жоско Пруфы в комментах

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @nft_banditka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Скам база в Telegram” (@nft_banditka), 14 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nft_banditka.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.