5 measurements spanning 6 days, net -16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,552–8,572 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 14:33
8,554
-7
9 Aug 2026, 11:32
8,561
-7
6 Aug 2026, 16:14
8,568
-2
6 Aug 2026, 03:30
8,570
no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:26
8,570
first reading
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 20 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,450
Videos
≈803
Links
≈945
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
8m 05s
Average length
2m 42s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
886 reactions across 10 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😢
340
38.4%
🔥
274
30.9%
👍
264
29.8%
👎
8
0.903%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 886reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 20 October 2025 to 17 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🇷🇺🎬 «Смеёшься или плачешь вместе с ним»
Фильм о погибшем герое-военкоре вошёл в программу кинофестиваля в Индии
Документальный фильм о посмертно награждённом орденом Мужества военном журналисте Ростиславе Журавлёве вошёл в программу фестиваля документалистики «14th Global Festival of Journalism & AVGC 2026» в Нью-Дели.
Картину «Парень с нашего двора» создала продюсер Инна Танашева, он включает в себя кадры первого …
Память военкоров, погибших при исполнении профессионального долга, почтили сегодня в Москве и в Донецке возложением цветов.
А в Луганске открылась фотовыставка "Погибли за правду", посвященная покойным журналистам.
🔹 Подписаться на РИА Новости
▶️ В День памяти журналистов, погибших при исполнении профессиональных обязанностей, выкладываем фрагмент из картины «Парень с нашего двора: Журавлёв». Она рассказывает о погибшем военкоре РИА Новости Ростиславе Журавлёве. Фильм входит в коллекцию фестиваля «RT.Док: Время наших героев».
О том, как важно хранить память о наших героях, мать погибшего Ростилава Журавлёва — Людмила Журавлёва 👇.
#RTДокФест
🥰 Подпишись …
15 декабря - День памяти журналистов, погибших при исполнении профессиональных обязанностей. Военкоры разных СМИ работают сейчас на фронтах СВО, и не только. Несут потери. Хоронят коллег и друзей. У них нет статуса ветеранов боевых действий, но есть ранения и боевые награды. Несмотря ни на что, они остаются на войне, продолжая исполнять свой профессиональный долг.
Документальный фильм о погибшем в зоне СВО военкоре РИА Новости Ростиславе Журавлеве "Парень с нашего двора: Журавлев" завоевал гран-при международного кинофестиваля ZILANT в Казани.
🔹 Подписаться на РИА Новости
Минутой молчания почтили память военного корреспондента РИА Новости Ивана Зуева в рамках кинофестиваля "RT.Док: Время наших героев" в Бейруте.
После показа картины о военкоре РИА Новости Ростиславе Журавлеве также прошла дискуссия зрителей с организаторами фестиваля, во время которой обсуждалась работа российских СМИ в условиях информационной блокады.
🔹 Подписаться на РИА Новости
Сегодня – Международный день военного журналиста
Сейчас можно говорить не о дне, а о времени военкоров. Для Свердловского творческого союза журналистов это именно так. Коллеги из военных и гражданских изданий региона едут «за ленточку», пишут и снимают правду об СВО , помогают мирным жителям. Погибают. Как Ростислав Журавлев, комната памяти которому оформлена в свердловском Домжуре, в которой идут занятия для юнкоров…
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @nezhurka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 752,721 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@nezhurka named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@rian_ru named in 12 posts, 8 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Нежурка” (@nezhurka), 8,554 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nezhurka.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
