Channel
@clean_coin
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
6subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001296625620 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @clean_coin |
| Description | Чистая монета - сообщество людей, которые интересуются достижениями России. Поэтому мы: 1. Тщательно отбираем новости 2. Освещаем актуальные и интересные события 3. Всегда указываем источник ВК: https://vk.com/clean_coin Рубрики: #подкаст |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/clean_coin |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:02 | 6 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:45 | 6 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 4 September 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 September 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 4 September 2022 to 30 September 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
В Георгиевском зале Кремля, где пройдёт историческая церемония подписания договоров о вхождении в состав России четырёх регионов, вместе с российским триколором стоят штандарты новых территорий
Сегодня в ООН.
Кстати, да. ЦРУ же уже организовывали подрыв подводного трубопровода в Никарагуа в 1983 году. Опыт есть.
Как видите, The Times уже раскрыла взрывы в Балтийском море. Уже особо не сомневается, что это был «Путинский глубоководный саботаж». Нарисовала, как подводные Петров и Боширов это сделали. И даже наметила следующие цели России - кабели между США и Британией, Интернет-соединение с Шетландскими, Оркнейскими островами и почему-то с «частями Италии». И уже без «хайли лайкли» - на это вчерашнего дня хватило. Быстро у них…
Геней
Россия стала больше
👍2
Джо Байден в 1997 году: Единственное, что может спровоцировать «решительный и враждебный» ответ России - это расширение НАТО до стран Балтии... Что именно и произошло.
🛑 Глава Крыма сообщил, что его сын призван в армию в рамках частичной мобилизации и уже отбыл в часть Рубрика «О чём не напишет ВВС»
Это Чечня. Рамзан Кадыров лично загоняет немногих добровольцев в военкомат. Как и в любые другие времена - участие в боевых действиях на благо своей страны является мощнейшим социальным лифтом. В Чечне, Бурятии и сотнях других местах по стране многие это прекрасно понимают. В Москве почему-то меньше, к сожалению.
Photo, posted without a caption
MWA-HA-HA!!!
Путин сегодня объявил частичную дедиванизацию военных экспертов. (с) не моё
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @clean_coin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@clean_coin named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Чистая монета” (@clean_coin), 6 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/clean_coin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.