Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ریاضی انسانی | محمد نظامی

Channel

ریاضی انسانی | محمد نظامی

@nezami_math_en

2 usernames

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,681subscribers

-372 since we began measuring on 27 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001672005639
TypeChannel
Usernames@nezami_math @nezami_math_en
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded27 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/nezami_math_en

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

18110,0535,11727 August 2026 — 10,053 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,053 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,028 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,004 subscribers30 August 2026 — 9,984 subscribers2 September 2026 — 9,919 subscribers6 September 2026 — 181 subscribers8 September 2026 — 9,826 subscribers10 September 2026 — 9,770 subscribers14 September 2026 — 9,716 subscribers15 September 2026 — 182 subscribers18 September 2026 — 9,681 subscribers9,68127 August 202618 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 22 days, net -372. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 13:569,681+9,499
15 Sept 2026, 09:22182-9,534
14 Sept 2026, 05:599,716-54
10 Sept 2026, 16:389,770-56
8 Sept 2026, 09:229,826+9,645
6 Sept 2026, 21:41181-9,738
2 Sept 2026, 18:249,919-65
30 Aug 2026, 16:169,984-20
29 Aug 2026, 16:2810,004-24
28 Aug 2026, 17:5710,028-25
27 Aug 2026, 18:4510,053no change
27 Aug 2026, 18:3010,053first reading

Engagement

45 posts held, back to 22 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.9%
avg views ÷ 9,681 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,150
45 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.50%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
45
of 45 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 41 of 45 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 September 2026
Posts held45 (22 August 20266 September 2026)
Views total51,968
Reactions total720
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Sept 2026, 09:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

720 reactions across 41 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
37852.5%
👍19126.5%
😁7810.8%
🔥476.53%
😢121.67%
🤝60.833%
💅40.556%
🫡20.278%
🏆10.139%
💯10.139%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 41 of the 45 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 720 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 22 August 2026 to 6 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Sept 2026, 12:50 UTC700 views5 reactionsread 8 September 2026

عزیزان؛ اگه رشته تجربی یا ریاضی هستید‼️ امسال با کلی محتوای رایگان و فعالیت رایگان اینجا کنارتونیم⬇️ ➡️@nezami_mathh

5

5 Sept 2026, 19:32 UTC862 views15 reactionsread 8 September 2026

اگه بنیان رو ندیدی تو این هفته ببین کمربندت رو باهاش سفت ببند که قراره بریم سراغ سالیانه🤝😎

15

5 Sept 2026, 19:19 UTC843 views1 reactionsread 8 September 2026
Voice message

⬜️بنیان، ساخت‌وساز ساختمان محکم ریاضی با پوشش ضعف‌های پایه. ◻️معرفی دوره رایگانِ بنیان. 💎 علاج ضعف پایه‌ی ریاضی 🔹🔹🔹🔹🔹🔹🔹🔹🔹🔹🔹 ✅ دسترسی به بنیان 🔹🔹🔹🔹🔹🔹🔹🔹🔹🔹🔹 ✅ آموزشگاه ریاضیِ نظامی 🔶@Nezami_Math

1

5 Sept 2026, 19:18 UTC776 views3 reactionsread 8 September 2026
File

جزوه کامل دوره •بنیان ۴۰۵ 🔹 @nezami_math

3

5 Sept 2026, 19:18 UTC822 views1 reactionsread 8 September 2026

⬅️ لیست جلسات کامل دوره بنیان 🔹 جلسه اول 🔹جلسه دوم 🔹 جلسه سوم 🔹 جلسه چهارم 🔹جلسه پنجم 🔹جلسه ششم 📱 @nezami_math

1

5 Sept 2026, 19:09 UTC724 views7 reactionsread 8 September 2026

یه دوره ۶ساعته ضبط کردن استاد مباحث پایه ای ریاضی روتدریس کردن قطعاا پیشنهاد میکنم ببین یعنی از الظامات هست تو آپارت استاد سرچ کنید میاره براتون

👍7

5 Sept 2026, 19:09 UTC718 viewsread 8 September 2026

چی هست؟ میشه توضیح بدی درباره اش؟

5 Sept 2026, 19:08 UTC740 viewsread 8 September 2026

سلام من اصلا نمی‌دونم تو چی ضعف دارم که اونو بر طرف کنم چطور میتونم آگاهی پیدا کنم نسبت به ضعفم؟

5 Sept 2026, 17:21 UTC857 views30 reactionsread 8 September 2026

ای کنکوری ۴۰۶🤷‍♀️ در آخرین روزای تابستونت ضعف های پایه ای ریاضیت رو برطرف کردی؟

15😢10👍3💅1🫡1

1 Sept 2026, 19:53 UTC≈1,700 views34 reactionsread 8 September 2026

مخاطب این صحبتام بیشتر همکارانم هستن که تو کانالن دانشجو معلمامون یا حتی بچه هایی که دوست دارن معلم شن من کامل با مشکلاتی که تو آموزش و پرورشه آشنام میدونم که چقدر سخته شرایط فعلی سنگ اندازی ها و بی مهری های اداره ها رو هم با گوشت و پوست و استخونم لمس کردم. دو سالی میشه که اگه میخوام کاری انجام بدم نه انتظاری از اداره داشتم نه آموزش پرورش خودم رفتم انجامش دادم چیزی که مهمه اینه که خروجی حتی شده کمی(اندازه ای که

34

Showing the 12 most recent of 45 posts we hold for @nezami_math_en. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

23 Aug 2026, 09:43 UTCAnonymous Poll537 voters

اعلام وضعیت

  1. کنکور ۴۰۵ بودم و تمااام✅69%
  2. کنکوری ۴۰۶ هستم🤝25%
  3. کنکوری ۴۰۷ و ۴۰۸ 👀7%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 22 August 2026 to 6 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

دهم ، یازدهم ، دوازدهم ، انسانی ، تجربی ، ریاضی
@konkur1403i · 38,396
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 31 August 2026
آکادمی کنکور | حسین بیگدلی
@novawisez · 150,612
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 18 September 2026
آکادمی کنکوری مانا
@mana_academii · 28,721
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 8 September 2026
تمشک | ویژه رشته انسانی
@tameshk100E · 47,527
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 8 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ریاضی انسانی | محمد نظامی” (@nezami_math_en), 9,681 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nezami_math_en.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.