Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for đ“Œ ⃝𝅄 áȘ¶Êżđ‘”𝒆𝒚𝒕𝒊𝒓𝒊'𝒔 đ‘«đ‘°đ‘šđ‘č𝒀𓈒 Û«Â â—Żâƒ˜ àœČ ⌑

Channel

đ“Œ ⃝𝅄 áȘ¶Êżđ‘”𝒆𝒚𝒕𝒊𝒓𝒊'𝒔 đ‘«đ‘°đ‘šđ‘č𝒀𓈒 Û«Â â—Żâƒ˜ àœČ ⌑

@neytiri_d1ary

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

143subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003257035810
TypeChannel
Username@neytiri_d1ary
CreatedBetween 1 October 2025 and 31 January 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/neytiri_d1ary

Growth

14313 Aug 2026, 03:31 — 143 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 10:04 — 143 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 03:3113 Aug 2026, 10:04
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 142–144 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 10:04143no change
13 Aug 2026, 03:31143first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 11 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
27.3%
avg views Ă· 143 subscribers
Avg views / post
39.0
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
38.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Ă· views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held10 (11 February 2026 – 11 August 2026)
Views total78
Reactions total30
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 03:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

165 reactions across 10 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 59877841383823839243823.0%
custom 59875365335177702763018.2%
custom 54115625728076945902313.9%
custom 54088889814357464851810.9%
custom 5201873877050879198148.48%
đŸ‘»106.06%
💘95.45%
custom 528729605639925731774.24%
custom 519054402390696341563.64%
custom 541113599665585630653.03%
custom 524243570710809233121.21%
custom 541140133973540293721.21%
custom 524034833582236139510.606%

Custom emoji. 11 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 165reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 11 February 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 10 we hold a reading for · 20%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @neytiri_d1ary. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 February 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 16:55 UTC40 views10 reactionsread 13 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

custom 59877841383823839244custom 52018738770508791983custom 59875365335177702763

11 Aug 2026, 16:55 UTC38 views20 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

💙💙💙 💙💙💙 # 𝑬đ‘șđ‘»đ‘Żđ‘Źđ‘»đ‘Ź 💙💙💙 😀😀😀😀😀😀𓈒֮ Ś„êŻ­ 𝚣 đ‘©đ’Šđ’đ’ˆđ’, 𝒃𝒊𝒏𝒈𝒐, 𝒃𝒂𝒃𝒚 𝑰 𝒍𝒐𝒗𝒆 𝑩𝑜𝑱, 𝒂𝒊𝒏'𝒕 𝒕𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝒄𝒓𝒂𝒛𝒚? 𝑰 𝒘𝒂𝒏𝒕 𝑩𝑜𝑱, 𝑰 𝒘𝒂𝒏𝒕 𝑩𝑜𝑱 𝒐𝒗𝒆𝒓 𝒂𝒈𝒂𝒊𝒏 đ‘©đ’Šđ’đ’ˆđ’, 𝒃𝒊𝒏𝒈𝒐, 𝒃𝒂𝒃𝒚 𝑰 𝒍𝒐𝒗𝒆 𝑩𝑜𝑱, 𝒂𝒊𝒏'𝒕 𝒕𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝒄𝒓𝒂𝒛𝒚? 𝑰 𝒘𝒂𝒏𝒕 𝑩𝑜𝑱, 𝑰 𝒘𝒂𝒏𝒕 𝑩𝑜𝑱 𝒐𝒗𝒆𝒓 𝒂𝒈𝒂𝒊𝒏 đŸ˜€đŸ˜€đŸ˜€đŸ˜€đŸ˜€đŸ˜€Ë›Ë›Û«  ゚𓏾⃘✿⃘ʃ đ‘¶đ’‰-𝒐𝒉, 𝑩𝑒𝑎ℎ-𝑩𝑒𝑎ℎ 𝑂ℎ-𝑜ℎ, 𝒚𝒆𝒂𝒉-𝒚𝒆𝒂𝒉 đ‘¶đ’‰-𝒐𝒉, 𝑩𝑒𝑎ℎ-𝑩𝑒𝑎ℎ 𝑂ℎ-𝑜ℎ, 𝒚𝒆𝒂𝒉-𝒚𝒆𝒂𝒉 đŸ€©đŸ€©đŸ€©đŸ€©đŸ€©đŸ€© đ‘Žđ’‚â€™đ‘±đ’‚đ’Œđ’†

custom 59877841383823839247custom 52872960563992573176đŸ‘»3custom 59875365335177702763custom 52018738770508791981

7 Jul 2026, 16:54 UTC248 views3 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @mp3_Tool_BotFile

File, posted without a caption

đŸ‘»2custom 52018738770508791981

7 Jul 2026, 16:54 UTC249 views27 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

đŸ€©đŸ€©đŸ€© đŸ€©đŸ€©đŸ€© # đ‘”đ‘Źđ‘Ÿđ‘·đ‘¶đ‘șđ‘» đŸ€©đŸ€©đŸ€© ⇄ ֮✧ ͜͡✧ đŸ€©đœ—đœš àœŽâ™Ąâƒ•ÛȘʚ ÖŽàč‘ âŸĄ 𓍱𓍱✣ ゙⃞֮ đŸ€©ÖŽ â–­Ś…àŁȘ 𝂅 𓈒 àŁȘ𔓕 ÖŽ đŸ€©á¶» 𝘇 ͟𐰁 ÖŽÛȘÖș ĐŽĐ»Ń ĐœĐ”Đčторо ŃĐ»ĐŸĐČа ЎжДĐčĐșа былО ŃƒĐŽĐ°Ń€ĐŸĐŒ. ĐŸĐœĐ° любОла Đ”ĐłĐŸ, ĐČДрОла Đ”ĐŒŃƒ, счОтала, Ń‡Ń‚ĐŸ ĐŸĐœĐž Đ±ŃƒĐŽŃƒŃ‚ ĐČĐŒĐ”ŃŃ‚Đ” ĐœĐ°ĐČсДгЎа. ĐżĐŸŃĐ»Đ” Ń‚ĐŸĐłĐŸ, ĐșаĐș ĐŽĐČух аĐČĐ°Ń‚Đ°Ń€ĐŸĐČ ŃĐČŃĐ·Đ°Đ»Đž, ĐŸĐŒĐ°â€™Ń‚ĐžĐșаĐčа сталО ĐłĐŸŃ‚ĐŸĐČоться Đș Ń‚ŃĐ¶Đ”Đ»ĐŸĐŒŃƒ Đ±ĐŸŃŽ. эĐčтуĐșĐ°Đœ проĐșазал Ń‚ŃŃƒâ€™Ń‚Đ”ŃŽ аĐșтоĐČĐœĐŸ ĐłĐŸŃ‚ĐŸĐČоть ĐČĐŸĐžĐœĐŸĐČ â€” ĐČŃ€Đ”ĐŒĐ”ĐœĐž ĐŸŃŃ‚Đ°Đ”Ń‚ŃŃ ĐŒĐ°Đ»ĐŸ. ĐœĐ”Đčторо жЎала ĐœĐ°ĐżĐ°ĐŽĐ”ĐœĐžŃ ĐœĐ”ĐŽĐ°Đ»Đ”ĐșĐŸ ĐŸŃ‚ ĐČŃ…ĐŸĐŽĐ° ĐČ ĐŽŃ€Đ”ĐČĐŸ-ĐŽĐŸĐŒ, гЎД ДД 

custom 59875365335177702768custom 51905440239069634156custom 52018738770508791985custom 59877841383823839245💘1custom 52403483358223613951custom 52872960563992573171

7 Jul 2026, 11:00 UTC173 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026

ĐœĐ°Đ±ĐŸŃ€ ĐČ ĐșĐŸĐœĐœĐ”Đșты ŃĐœĐŸĐČа ĐŸŃ‚Đșрыт, ĐŸŃ‡Đ”ĐœŃŒ Đ¶ĐŽŃƒđŸ„ł

custom 59875365335177702762

4 Apr 2026, 16:13 UTC632 views3 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 54088889814357464853

8 Mar 2026, 12:36 UTC920 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

custom 54111359966558563061

8 Mar 2026, 12:36 UTC892 views33 reactions2 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟 # đ‘”đ‘Źđ‘Ÿđ‘·đ‘¶đ‘șđ‘» 🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟 đ”Œđ”“•Ìž 𐊯 đŸȘŒâ•Œ àž±â•žâžŒàŁȘ ֮✿゙ ă‚™âƒžÖŽÖąđ‚…Ś„đŸ„ â•șâ•ș â•Ÿđ”Œđ”“•Ìž đŠŻïž¶ ⊱۫ Û«đ“Ź 𓏬 Öșïž© 𓍱 𓏏 。͡đŸȘŒá€łàżšàœŽ Ś„ ˛ Ń€Đ°ĐœĐ”Đ” ŃƒŃ‚Ń€ĐŸ ĐŸŃ‰ŃƒŃ‰Đ°Đ»ĐŸŃŃŒ ĐŽĐ»Ń пары ĐżĐŸ ĐœĐŸĐČĐŸĐŒŃƒ. лДгĐșĐžĐč ĐČĐ”Ń‚Đ”Ń€ĐŸĐș Ўул, застаĐČĐžĐČ ĐœĐ”Đčторо ĐŸŃ‚Đșрыть глаза. ĐŽĐ”ĐČушĐșа была ĐČ ĐœĐ”Đ±ĐŸĐ»ŃŒŃˆĐŸĐŒ ĐœĐ”ĐŽĐŸŃƒĐŒĐ”ĐœĐžĐž, ĐœĐŸ Ń€Đ°ĐŽĐŸŃŃ‚ŃŒ ĐżĐ”Ń€Đ”ĐżĐŸĐ»ĐœŃĐ»Đ° ДД сДрЎцД. Ń‚Đ”ĐżĐ”Ń€ŃŒ ĐŸĐœĐ° Đ·ĐœĐ°Đ»Đ°, Ń‡Ń‚ĐŸ ĐŸĐœĐž — ĐŸĐŽĐœĐŸ Ń†Đ”Đ»ĐŸĐ” ĐœĐ° ĐČсДгЎа, Ń‡Ń‚ĐŸ ЎажД эĐčĐČа ĐœĐ” ĐżŃ€ĐŸŃ‚ĐžĐČ Đ”Đ” ŃĐŸŃŽĐ·Đ° с ЎжДĐčĐșĐŸĐŒ. с ŃŃ‚ĐžĐŒĐž ĐŒŃ‹ŃĐ»ŃĐŒĐž ĐŽĐ”ĐČушĐșа ŃƒŃĐœŃƒĐ»Đ°. чДрДз Đœâ€Š

custom 541156257280769459012custom 59877841383823839249💘6custom 59875365335177702764custom 54114013397354029372

11 Feb 2026, 11:16 UTC≈1,200 views18 reactionsread 13 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

custom 59875365335177702768custom 59877841383823839247custom 54111359966558563063

11 Feb 2026, 11:15 UTC≈1,250 views48 reactions3 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

đŸ€©đŸ€© đŸ€©đŸ€© # 𝑬đ‘șđ‘»đ‘Żđ‘Źđ‘»đ‘Ź đŸ€©đŸ€© ⇄ ֮✧ đŸ€ÍœÍĄâœ§ đ‚…Ś„ đ”“•ÌžÖŽ àŁł đŸŒžđœ—đœšàœŽâ˜… 𝇋𝇋 ۫͜ ╌àŁȘ ÖŽá€łâœżà„’àŁȘŚ„ ⁝ ⁝꒱꒱ đŸ€Ìž Ìž ÖŽÛȘÖș ÖŽ 𝒀𝒐𝒖 𝒈𝒐 𝒅𝒐𝒘𝒏 𝒋𝒖𝒔𝒕 𝒍𝒊𝒌𝒆 𝑯𝒐𝒍𝒚 𝑮𝒂𝒓𝒚 𝑮𝒂𝒓𝒚 𝒐𝒏 𝒂, 𝑮𝒂𝒓𝒚 𝒐𝒏 𝒂 𝒄𝒓𝒐𝒔𝒔 𝒀𝒐𝒖𝒓 𝒃𝒆𝒂𝒖𝒕𝒚 𝒏𝒆𝒗𝒆𝒓 𝒆𝒗𝒆𝒓 𝒔𝒄𝒂𝒓𝒆𝒅 𝒎𝒆 𝑮𝒂𝒓𝒚 𝒐𝒏 𝒂, 𝑮𝒂𝒓𝒚 𝒐𝒏 𝒂 𝒄𝒓𝒐𝒔𝒔 𝑰𝒇 𝒚𝒐𝒖 𝒄𝒉𝒐𝒐𝒔𝒆 𝒕𝒐 𝒓𝒖𝒏 𝒂𝒘𝒂𝒚 𝒘𝒊𝒕𝒉 𝒎𝒆 𝑰 𝒘𝒊𝒍𝒍 𝒕𝒊𝒄𝒌𝒍𝒆 𝒚𝒐𝒖 𝒊𝒏𝒕𝒆𝒓𝒏𝒂𝒍𝒍𝒚 𝑹𝒏𝒅 𝑰 𝒔𝒆𝒆 𝒏𝒐𝒕𝒉𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒘𝒓𝒐𝒏𝒈 𝒘𝒊𝒕𝒉 𝒕𝒉𝒂𝒕 đ‘”đ’đ’•đ’‰đ’Šđ’đ’ˆ 𝒘𝒓𝒐𝒏𝒈 𝒘𝒊𝒕𝒉 𝒕𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝑮𝒂𝒓𝒚 𝒐𝒏 𝒂, 𝑮𝒂𝒓𝒚 𝒐𝒏 𝒂 𝒄𝒓𝒐𝒔𝒔 đ‘”đ’đ’•đ’‰đ’Šđ’đ’ˆ 𝒘𝒓𝒐𝒏𝒈 𝒘𝒊𝒕𝒉 𝒕𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝑮𝒂𝒓𝒚 𝒐𝒏 𝒂, 𝑮𝒂𝒓𝒚 𝒐𝒏 𝒂 𝒄𝒓𝒐𝒔𝒔 𝑮𝒂𝒓𝒚 𝒐

custom 540888898143574648515custom 541156257280769459011custom 59877841383823839246đŸ‘»5custom 52018738770508791984💘2custom 52424357071080923312custom 59875365335177702762

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @neytiri_d1ary. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 187,330 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 25 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

АрхоĐČ Neytiri's Diary
@achive_neytiri · 2
6 posts
архоĐČ ĐœĐ”Ń‚Đ”
@arhvnetey · 1
4 posts
攷掋 ┄ đ–©đ–șđ—„đ–Ÿ đ–Č𝗎𝗅𝗅𝗒 ‱ đ–șđ—‡đ—ˆđ—đ—đ–Ÿđ—‹ 𝗌𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗒🛾
@JAKESULLY_diary · 65
2 posts
archiveđŸ«†
@Narans_diary · 5
2 posts
архоĐČ
@arjdjakqkKka · 1
1 post
ЗᎀᎋᎩы᎛ | à»’đ”Œ Öč đžđŒâ€™đżđŒđ’©â€™đ’ź đ’ŸđŒđ’œđ‘…đ’Ž ʁ ᚐ
@Eilingo · 14
1 post
ᯏ đ™šđ™˜đ™đ™€ đ™€đ™› 𝙚𝙼𝙬𝙖 𝘇 𐰁 ( заĐșŃ€Ń‹Ń‚ĐŸ )
@eywaecho · 8
1 post
𝙄𝙆𝙀𝙔𝙉𝙄®𝙎 𝘏𝘌𝘈𝘙𝘛 [❀‍đŸ©č]
@IKEYN1HEAR7 · 34
1 post
АрхоĐČ Ayla' s diary
@info_aylas_diary · 1
1 post
info # / архоĐČ
@infokiris · 1
1 post
𝗝𝒂𝕜𝒆 đ–Č𝕩đ—čđ—č𝒚 |📜| đ– đ—‹đ–Œđ—đ—‚đ—đ–Ÿ
@JakeSallyarchive · 4
1 post
Kelly’s archive
@KELLYmeson · 3
1 post
𝘔𝘖'𝘈𝘛 𝘋𝘐𝘈𝘙𝘠
@MO444T · 30
1 post
𝘐𝘕𝘍𝘖 𝘔𝘖'𝘈𝘛
@MO45T_INFO · 1
1 post
^Ɏᎇ᎛ᎇʏᎀᎍxx^
@Neteyamxx · 116
1 post
neytiri's archive
@neytiriarchive · 1
1 post
âœ§đ„žâ™Źđ“đ“žđ“œđ“Žđ“Ș_𝓐𝓿đ“Șđ“œđ“Șđ“»â™Źđ„žâœ§
@Notka_Avatar · 129
1 post
á­Ą đ–„đ–šđ–±đ–Č𝖳 đ–Ąđ–źđ–±đ–­ đ–Č𝖼𝖭 àŒ„
@Te7amSS · 50
1 post
#K // her memories
@thekioanadiary · 26
1 post
closed || đ‘Ș𝑯𝑹đ‘Șđ‘¶đ‘” đ‘».
@trudydiary · 41
1 post
𝅚𝅛Üč ÜčâžÛ«Ö”âžđŸ—ž Öș🅃𝒼SE'Lđ’Ÿ â–­Ś… ֮𝄒𝄒𝂅 ÖŽÛȘÖș đ“žÌ” 𓈒 𝅄֮” đ•œđ•Żđ•Ź „ÖčÖŽđ…œ 📃
@TzzALIRDajj · 17
1 post
đ™‘đ˜Œđ™đ˜Œđ™‰đ™‚//𝙃𝙀𝙇𝙋
@VARANG_HeLp · 24
1 post
đ–č-𝖣𝖼𝖩 ‘ заĐșрыт.
@zdogdiary · 13
1 post
. ꒷ ˚.â„€đ• đ•–đ•Șá”ˆá¶Šá”ƒÊłÊžË™ .˚.⋆
@Zoeydiary0 · 8
1 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

â€œđ“Œ ⃝𝅄 áȘ¶Êżđ‘”𝒆𝒚𝒕𝒊𝒓𝒊'𝒔 đ‘«đ‘°đ‘šđ‘č𝒀𓈒 Û«Â â—Żâƒ˜ àœČ ⌑” (@neytiri_d1ary), 143 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/neytiri_d1ary.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.