Channel
@neyro_razvitie
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
285subscribers
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002842811338 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @neyro_razvitie |
| Description | Канал нейрологопеда для мам детей 4–10 лет: как по бытовым трудностям заметить, какие функции ребёнку даются сложно, и поддержать речь, внимание и координацию простыми играми дома. |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 1 |
| On Telegram | t.me/neyro_razvitie |
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Oct 2026, 13:22 | 285 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 11 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (11 September 2026 – 8 October 2026) |
| Views total | 633 |
| Reactions total | 29 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Oct 2026, 13:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
30 reactions across 11 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 16 | 53.3% | |
| ❤🔥 | 8 | 26.7% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 20.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 11 September 2026 to 8 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Начинаю серию о речи и движении. Расскажу, почему в моих занятиях столько обычных бытовых вещей. Мой средний сын не говорил до трёх лет. Два года я помогала ему осваивать речь. Через него я пришла в профессию, и этот опыт остаётся со мной в работе. В школе и частной практике встречаю детей с разными трудностями: произнести звук, выразить мысль, объяснить так, чтобы поняли. А рядом могут быть трудности с движениями …
❤1🔥1
Video, posted without a caption
Video message, posted without a caption
❤🔥3
Для примера покажу вам 3 описания картинок. Задача была - расположить картинки в логической последовательности (и с этим дети справились) и составить рассказ. У этих деток еще все не так плохо) Хотя в последнем описании девочка, конечно, не справилась с логической последовательностью. Как думаете, при чем здесь пуговицы, шнурки, перчатки? Накидайте 10 🔥 Я создала классный гайд по возрастам - размещу его здесь 🫶
Video message, posted without a caption
❤🔥3
Знает про космос, а перчатка не надевается? Ваш ребенок взахлеб рассказывает о Солнечной системе, о Юпитере 🌏🪐🌍 При этом, когда пытается надеть перчатку, пальчики не попадают в нужный домик 🧤 В разговорах с мамами мне часто встречается фраза: «Более самостоятельно чтобы сам делать мог». Очень понятное желание. Особенно когда выходить из дома нужно было пять минут назад, а он еще возится… Знания и движения рук м…
❤🔥2🔥2
Если задуматься, мы, взрослые, довольно странно объясняем время. «Завтра пойдём». Ребёнок проснулся: «Завтра наступило?» «Да, только теперь это сегодня». Спасибо, мам. Очень понятно 😄 А ещё у нас есть «сейчас», которое иногда означает «когда я закончу разговор, найду ключи и допью чай». Мне нравится смотреть на такие вещи с детской стороны. Мы ждём правильного слова, а за ним оказывается целая задача: понять, где…
❤3
Сегодня у медведя важная корреспонденция. Скорее всего, приглашение на чай к зайцу 😄 Предлагаю открыть дома почту. Три листочка складываем пополам, рассаживаем две игрушки в разных местах — можно работать. «Отнеси письмо медведю». Получилось? Тогда следующее поручение: «Возьми письмо, обойди стул и отнеси зайцу». Пока ребёнок идёт, ему нужно помнить, куда он направляется и что собирался сделать по дороге. Вот тут…
❤3
Posted without readable text
Ребёнок заговорил. Можно выдохнуть? 17 сентября в Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research (Журнал исследований речи, языка и слуха) вышло исследование, которым хочу с вами поделиться. В нём участвовали 75 трёхлетних детей. 44 ребёнка развивались в речи типично, а 31 раньше относился к late talkers — детям с поздним началом речи. К трём годам эти дети уже говорили. И исследователи решили посмотреть не то…
❤4
Сегодня предлагаю официально разрешить детям исправлять взрослых 😄 Я говорю: — Кошка ест из мишки. Ребёнок должен поймать ошибку: — Не из мишки, а из миски! Кажется, просто смешная игра. Но в этот момент ребёнок слушает всю фразу, замечает разницу между похожими словами, проверяет смысл и подбирает правильный вариант. Можно продолжить: — На столе стоит тачка с чаем. — На доме сидит крыса. — В лесу растёт мышка…
🔥3
МАМА, Я ВСЁ ПОНЯЛ! Иногда эта фраза звучит очень уверенно. А потом ребёнок берёт не тот предмет, идёт не туда и делает совсем не то. Но с таким серьёзным лицом, будто именно это вы и просили. Поэтому сегодня предлагаю маленький домашний квест. Он покажет понимание лучше, чем вопрос: «Ты точно всё понял?» Берём три бумажки. На первой пишем: Возьми красный предмет, обойди стул и положи его под стол. Под столом р…
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @neyro_razvitie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Ребенок дернул оборванный провод и упал без сознания, рука на проводе. Что делать в первую очередь?
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
На летней площадке ребенок вялый, кожа горячая и сухая, пульс частый, потерял сознание. Что делать?
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 11 September 2026 to 8 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“НейроБудни | Влада Оленева | Логопед-дефектолог” (@neyro_razvitie), 285 subscribers as measured 8 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/neyro_razvitie.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.