Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

⋆·˚ 𝗡𝗘̷𝗫: 𝕄𝔼𝕀 ᴳᴳ ༘ 🧬

@nexmeioi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

13subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002817129247
TypeChannel
Username@nexmeioi
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 17 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/nexmeioi

Growth

1314 Aug 2026, 07:16 — 13 subscribers14 Aug 2026, 17:27 — 13 subscribers14 Aug 2026, 07:1614 Aug 2026, 17:27
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12–14 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 17:2713no change
14 Aug 2026, 07:1613first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 17 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
9m 47s
Average length
3m 16s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

30 reactions across 6 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5319276073647622423516.7%
🕊516.7%
custom 5071225704960492239413.3%
custom 5319123344610576194413.3%
custom 5206199738046621763310.0%
🆒310.0%
🐳310.0%
custom 524670531262220805526.67%
custom 602141289049647342113.33%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 September 2025 to 28 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Oct 2025, 17:48 UTC64 views3 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @ayaswereVideo

NEW COVER 🔗 °\•\°| 🎶 SONG - RICH MAN (AESPA) eungji • melanie • care • yujin❕ делитесь вашим мнением в комментах ⬇️

🐳1🕊1🆒1

28 Oct 2025, 17:48 UTC65 viewsread 14 August 2026

у наших зай аяс новый кавер 🐰 давайте поддержим!

19 Oct 2025, 14:04 UTC165 views7 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

🤩关系 @. 🔠EX:M🌟I ** #WHY.? ##. C❄️LLABORATION** ✍️ best beliеve I keep’em running back 奈克🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩梅.>> 🔠🔠🔠: 🔠🔠🔠& 🔠🔠🔠'🔠 SONG. . PURRRFECT. .VVS ONLY REASON THAT YOU'RE MAD IS CAUSE WE'RE PURRRFECT 🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 ✔️// @. @NEXMEIoi & @ayaswere Tags::** #COMEBACK #COLLABORATION #NEXMEI

🕊3🐳2🆒2

18 Oct 2025, 08:15 UTC55 views1 reactionsread 14 August 2026
File

🤩关系 @. 🔡EX:M🌟I ** #WHY.? 🤩🤩 ##. NEW PR❄️CTICE ** ✍️ best beliеve I keep’em running back 奈克🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩梅.>> SSIEEN'S NEW PRACTICE 🔠ORTIS - G🔠! поддержите реакциями ! 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 ✈️// @. @NEXMEIoi

🕊1

4 Oct 2025, 14:35 UTC68 viewsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @handsupawardsPoll

ОБЩЕЕ ГОЛОСОВАНИЕ ! 奖项

  1. R!XES37%
  2. ZIGZAG14%
  3. LYONYA7%
  4. NEX:MEI4%
  5. INVEIL4%
  6. AERI28%
  7. MINNA18%
  8. PHANTASIA9%
  9. WHILLS12%
  10. REZ:EN10%

The shares total 143%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

27 Sept 2025, 09:03 UTC80 views9 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

. 关系 @. 🔠EX:M🌟I ** #WHY.? ✍️ best beliеve I keep’em running back 奈克🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩梅.> 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 ! ! 🔠EX:M🌟I & L🔠ONEY SONG. MEOVV - HANDS UP put your hands up! 🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 💜// @. @NEXMEIoi & @Looney_KimLee

custom 52061997380466217632custom 52467053126222080552custom 53192760736476224232custom 50712257049604922391custom 53191233446105761941custom 60214128904964734211

27 Sept 2025, 06:58 UTC57 views9 reactionsread 14 August 2026

🔠EX:M🌟I & #who?

custom 50712257049604922393custom 53191233446105761943custom 53192760736476224233

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @nexmeioi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Oct 2025, 14:35 UTCFinal Results210 voters

ОБЩЕЕ ГОЛОСОВАНИЕ ! 奖项

  1. R!XES37%
  2. ZIGZAG14%
  3. LYONYA7%
  4. NEX:MEI4%
  5. INVEIL4%
  6. AERI28%
  7. MINNA18%
  8. PHANTASIA9%
  9. WHILLS12%
  10. REZ:EN10%

The shares total 143%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

21 Sept 2025, 12:42 UTCFinal Results150 voters

━━━━━━ ・❪ ☪ ❫ ・━━━━━━ WINNER? ━━━━━━ ・❪ ☪ ❫ ・━━━━━━

  1. FQ - SUPER LADY5%
  2. ENFYNIX - BITE ME11%
  3. NEX:MEI - KLAXON11%
  4. INVEIL - FAMOUS5%
  5. W!DNEX - FOREVE17%
  6. KI - LOVED15%
  7. LIKA - DANGEROUSLY3%
  8. SCORPIONS - PLAYING WITH FIRE15%
  9. LAW - CEREMONY4%
  10. DIOR - JUMP13%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 September 2025 to 28 October 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 784,312 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“⋆·˚ 𝗡𝗘̷𝗫: 𝕄𝔼𝕀 ᴳᴳ ༘ 🧬” (@nexmeioi), 13 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nexmeioi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.