Channel
@newz_psy
On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
544subscribers
-35 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001765653586 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @newz_psy |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/newz_psy |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 43% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also sits inside a group of 6 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
No sample pairs were kept for this entry. The counts below were measured, but without the pairs there is nothing here for you to open and check, so treat the relationship as recorded rather than demonstrated.
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @poiskkoych | 14 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (12–2) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 18 comparable posts for this entry, running 16 October 2025 to 6 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Of the group of 6 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @psyvakansii. That channel is not among the channels listed above, so this entry may share no posts with it and this does not say where this entry’s content came from. It is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel is in a group of 6 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Nov 2026, 13:56 | 544 | -3 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 15:26 | 547 | -1 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 12:49 | 548 | -1 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 22:28 | 549 | -4 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 23:01 | 553 | -2 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 03:18 | 555 | -8 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 06:59 | 563 | -2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 13:28 | 565 | -7 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:36 | 572 | -6 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 04:56 | 578 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:52 | 581 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:21 | 579 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:03 | 579 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 16 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
3 reactions across 1 post, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 33.3% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 33.3% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 October 2025 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Психологам: своя страница для продажи консультаций и гайдов. 0% комиссии Витрины с продаж 🗓 клиент сам выбирает слот и оплачивает, ссылка на звонок приходит вам обоим на почту 📄 гайд уходит покупателю автоматически 🎁 лид-магнит собирает email-базу 💳 оплата картой и СБП, деньги напрямую вам Как выглядит - https://vytrina.ru/massimoaurelio Покупателю не надо регистрироваться. Собрать витрину - минут 15. 2 месяца Pr…
Очнись! 🍂Как часто ты задумываешься о том, что на самом деле происходит? Останавливаешься, переводишь дух, выходишь из привычного ритма жизни, чтобы осознать, где ты сейчас находишься? 😤«Еще один психолог пытается продать свои услуги», подумаешь ты. Возможно. А возможно, это знак, который ты так долго втайне ждешь, чтобы развеять туман «нормальности» и «привычности». ❔Задуматься о том, какие решения ты принимаешь.…
⛔️ Клиент говорит: «Я постоянно в себе сомневаюсь и чувствую себя неполноценным», а у вас внутри всё сжимается от страха сделать только хуже... Вы можете знать десятки теорий о любви к себе, но когда перед вами сидит человек с разбитой самооценкой и жесткой самокритикой, общие фразы перестают работать. Многие психологи избегают таких запросов или забирают разговор на другие темы, а те, кто берет — ведут терапию на …
Клиенты уходят из терапии не потому, что у них «нет денег» или «всё наладилось». Правда в том, что им не хватает измеримого прогресса. Если вы ведете сессии только на интуиции и не даете человеку видимого результата с первой встречи, он сольется после 2–3 консультаций. А вы продолжите переживать за каждый кейс, выгорать и работать за копейки. 🚩 Практикующие специалисты решают эту проблему в Telegram-канале @club_cb…
⛔️ Клиент годами ходит по кругу в своей боли, а у вас внутри всё сжимается от бессилия и страха, что вы не можете ему помочь… Знакомо? Вы можете знать десятки классических подходов, но когда психолог сталкивается с тяжелыми блоками клиента, обычные разговоры перестают работать. Вы просто тащите терапию на собственном ресурсе и выгораете, пытаясь «переварить» чужую травму. Но чтобы давать квантовые результаты, не ну…
Коллеги психологи, теперь не нужно искать полезные материалы по десяткам чатов и каналов Мы собрали в одном месте всё, что помогает психологу развивать частную практику и профессионально расти. Приглашаем вас в Сообщество психологов, где вы получите доступ к: ✔️базе бесплатных материалов, гайдов и чек-листов; ✔️полезным статьям и инструментам для работы; ✔️агрегатору для поиска клиентов и продвижению; ✔️анонсам ин…
Почему один психолог берет за сессию 1 500 рублей, а другой — 25 000? Дело не в дипломах и не в таланте, а в том, умеете ли вы давать результат в критических ситуациях. Когда у клиента измена, авария или ПТСР после боевых действий, ему плевать на ваши рассуждения о детстве. Ему нужен хирург, который вытащит осколок из психики. Если у вас нет маршрута терапии, вы будете топтаться на месте. Сегодня поговорили про ма…
⚠️Более 210 заявок на психологическое консультирование за прошлый месяц. Если вы еще не попробовали PSI-БИРЖУ заявок, то вы прямо сейчас упускаете возможность закрыть все рабочие окошки в новом году. ‼️Успейте присоединиться по стартовому прайсу‼️
❕В нашем боте для клиентских запросов освободилась вакансия специалиста бота⚡️ @PsyPoisk_bot - помогает пользователям подобрать онлайн-психолога. ❤️У вас есть возможность стать специалистом бота и получать напрямую переход потенциального клиента к вам в профиль. Или сделать рассылку по всем пользователям с кнопкой на переход к вам в канал или личную переписку. ⬇️ Уточнить условия ⬇️ Подать заявку на размещение св…
⚡️⚡️⚡️Успейте одним из первых присоединиться к новому проекту для психологов "PSI-БИРЖА заявок". Все заявки на психологическую помощь в одном месте💬Ежедневно 5-15 заявок на консультацию. В октябре передали специалистам 210+ запросов на работу с психологом🔥 ➕2️⃣1️⃣1️⃣2️⃣1️⃣ 400+ чатов и 80+ ботов для психолога🤝 ПОЛУЧИТЬ ДОСТУП▶️
Меня зовут Виктория Михайлова, я выпускница магистратуры НИУ ВШЭ «Психоанализ и психоаналитическое бизнес-консультирование» (диплом с отличием). Клинический психолог (МИП). Сейчас заканчиваю обучение у IPA психоаналитика Марка Солмса «Клиническое применение нейропсихоанализа». На данный момент веду личную психоаналитическую практику 3 года. Мои клиенты - это женщины и мужчины, которые хотят получать удовольствие от …
Начинающие🔹психологи pinned Deleted message
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @newz_psy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@newz_psy named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Начинающие🔹психологи” (@newz_psy), 544 subscribers as measured 13 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/newz_psy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.