Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

๐—ก๐—˜๐—ช๐—ฆ

@news_ProL

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Stars ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry

876subscribers

+83 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002402874405
TypeChannel
Username@news_ProL
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/news_ProL

Growth

793876834.57 August 2026 โ€” 793 subscribers7 August 2026 โ€” 831 subscribers8 August 2026 โ€” 831 subscribers15 August 2026 โ€” 876 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days, net +83. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 781โ€“888 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 19:17876+45
8 Aug 2026, 01:30831no change
7 Aug 2026, 22:56831+38
7 Aug 2026, 16:15793first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
25.6%
avg views รท 876 subscribers
Avg views / post
224
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.83%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท viewsโ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 18 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (7 August 2026 โ€“ 7 August 2026)
Views total4,486
Reactions total193
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 01:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

193 reactions across 18 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
๐Ÿคฃ7036.3%
โค6332.6%
๐Ÿ”ฅ2211.4%
โšก126.22%
โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ63.11%
๐Ÿ†63.11%
๐Ÿ‘42.07%
๐Ÿ‘42.07%
๐Ÿ˜ฑ21.04%
๐Ÿฅฐ21.04%
๐Ÿ˜10.518%
๐Ÿ˜ญ10.518%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 193reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for ยท 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars โ€” bought with money โ€” on a post by @news_ProL. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramโ€™s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 21:12 UTC105 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ะ‘ะปะฐ ะฐะผะธ ั€ะตะฐะบัะธั ะฑะทะฐะฝะตะฝ ะฟะพัั‚ะพะดะฐ ะผะฐั‚ะธะฒะฐั‚ัะฐ ัˆะฐะฒะฐ๐Ÿคฆ

๐Ÿคฃ8โค1

7 Aug 2026, 21:00 UTC106 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @fctitanteamPhoto

๐Ÿ˜Ž๐…๐‚ ๐“๐ˆ๐“๐€๐ 3๏ธโƒฃโž–1๏ธโƒฃ๐€๐Œ๐๐€ ๐Ÿฅถ #PROLEAGUE #SEASON5 #TUR_15 @JANOB003 5๏ธโƒฃโŒ4๏ธโƒฃ @Maga_1001 ๐Ÿ†๐Ÿ†๐Ÿ†๐Ÿ†๐Ÿ†๐Ÿ†๐Ÿ†๐Ÿ†๐Ÿ†๐Ÿ†๐Ÿ†

โค6โšก5๐Ÿ‘2

7 Aug 2026, 20:53 UTC128 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

๐Ÿ†๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฏ #PROLEUGUE #SEASON_5 #TOUR_15 โค๏ธ Gissar 3โƒฃโž–1โƒฃ Vahdatโ˜บ๏ธ @TOJDOR06 2โƒฃโž–1โƒฃ @oyatullo2004 ะ‘ะพะทะธะธ ะดะตะฑัŽั‚ะธะธ ะœะฐั…ะผะฐะดัƒะปะปะพ ะดะฐั€ าณะฐะนัŠะฐั‚ะธ ะ“ะธััะฐั€ ๐Ÿ’–

โค8๐Ÿ‘1๐Ÿ”ฅ1

7 Aug 2026, 20:45 UTC118 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @fctitanteamPhoto

๐Ÿ˜Ž๐…๐‚ ๐“๐ˆ๐“๐€๐ 3๏ธโƒฃโž–1๏ธโƒฃ๐€๐Œ๐๐€ ๐Ÿฅถ #PROLEAGUE #SEASON5 #TUR_15 @diazzzzz7 3๏ธโƒฃโŒ2๏ธโƒฃ @HABIBJON_00 ๐Ÿ†๐Ÿ†๐Ÿ†๐Ÿ†๐Ÿ†๐Ÿ†๐Ÿ†๐Ÿ†๐Ÿ†๐Ÿ†๐Ÿ†

โค2

7 Aug 2026, 18:58 UTC191 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

๐Ÿ™ˆ2๏ธโƒฃโž–3๏ธโƒฃ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฏ ๐Ÿ˜˜ #PROLEAGUE #TOUR_15 #SEASON_5 @KhALiLuLLOh 10:1 @ef2306hs ๐Ÿ™‚๐Ÿ™‚๐Ÿ™‚๐Ÿ™‚๐Ÿ™‚๐Ÿ™‚๐Ÿ™‚๐Ÿ™‚๐Ÿ™‚๐Ÿ™‚๐Ÿ™‚

๐Ÿคฃ17โค2๐Ÿ˜ฑ2

7 Aug 2026, 18:42 UTC192 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

๐Ÿ™ˆ2๏ธโƒฃโž–3๏ธโƒฃ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฏ ๐Ÿ˜˜ #PROLEAGUE #TOUR_15 #SEASON_5 @xusravjr 5๏ธโƒฃโž–0๏ธโƒฃ @Isroilshoh ๐Ÿ™‚๐Ÿ™‚๐Ÿ™‚๐Ÿ™‚๐Ÿ™‚๐Ÿ™‚๐Ÿ™‚๐Ÿ™‚๐Ÿ™‚๐Ÿ™‚๐Ÿ™‚

โค4

7 Aug 2026, 17:19 UTC246 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

@J_FELX_07 ะฑะตาณั‚ะฐั€ะธะฝ ะฑะพะทะธะฝะณะฐั€ะน โค๏ธ๐Ÿ˜Ž ะดะฐั€ 7 ะดะฐะฒั€ะธ ะพั…ะธั€ะธ #PROLEAGUE #SEASON5

๐Ÿคฃ18โค5๐Ÿ”ฅ2๐Ÿ˜ญ1

7 Aug 2026, 15:23 UTC260 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @fctitanteamPhoto

๐Ÿ˜Ž๐…๐‚ ๐“๐ˆ๐“๐€๐ 1๏ธโƒฃโž–1๏ธโƒฃ๐€๐Œ๐๐€ ๐Ÿฅถ #PROLEAGUE #SEASON5 #TUR_15 @Legend_pesser 5๏ธโƒฃโŒ3๏ธโƒฃ @abdu_jr7 ๐Ÿ†๐Ÿ†๐Ÿ†๐Ÿ†๐Ÿ†๐Ÿ†๐Ÿ†๐Ÿ†๐Ÿ†๐Ÿ†๐Ÿ†

๐Ÿคฃ7โค1๐Ÿ‘1

7 Aug 2026, 09:27 UTC285 views8 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @oldpessersPhoto

๐Ÿ˜˜#PROLEAGUE #SEASON5 ๐Ÿ˜ณ#TUR_16 ๐Ÿ’–OLDPESSER1๏ธโƒฃโž—1๏ธโƒฃMADRIDโค๏ธ @xattabb46 3๏ธโƒฃ๐Ÿ†Ž1๏ธโƒฃ@Alijonll ๐Ÿ”ž๐Ÿ”ž๐Ÿ”ž๐Ÿ”ž๐Ÿ”ž๐Ÿ”ž๐Ÿ”ž

โšก3๐Ÿ†2๐Ÿ”ฅ2๐Ÿคฃ1

7 Aug 2026, 08:51 UTC306 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

๐Ÿ†๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฏ #PROLEUGUE #SEASON_5 #TOUR_15 โค๏ธ Gissar 3โƒฃโž–2โƒฃ Titan ๐Ÿ˜Ž @Can_123Yaman 3โƒฃโž–1โƒฃ @zicoo_ef

โค11๐Ÿ”ฅ5โšก4

7 Aug 2026, 08:48 UTC265 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ะฅะฐะผะธ ะฟะพัั‚ะพะดะฐ ัะณะพะฝ ั€ะตะฐะบั†ะธัั‡ะฐ ะฑะทะฐะฝะตะฝ ั…ะฐะผัƒ ะฑั€ะธะดะฐะณะธั€ะฐะผ ะบะฐะนั„ ะบะฝะฐ ะดะฐั€ ะฑะพะทะธัˆ ะฏะณะพะฝั‡ะพั‚ะพะฝ ะบะฐะผ ะฝะฐะผะตัˆะฐ๐Ÿต

โค1

7 Aug 2026, 08:45 UTC261 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

๐Ÿ†๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฏ #PROLEUGUE #SEASON_5 #TOUR_16 โค๏ธ MADRIDISTAS 4โƒฃโž–1โƒฃ Old pesser ๐Ÿคฉ @Pablllooooo 4โƒฃโž–6โƒฃ @abuchai_65

โค10๐Ÿ”ฅ5๐Ÿฅฐ2๐Ÿ‘1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @news_ProL. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions โ€” Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank โ€” 136,567 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ€” republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ€” and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโ€™s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ€” a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel โ€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโ€™s namer to yesterdayโ€™s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ๐—ก๐—˜๐—ช๐—ฆโ€ (@news_ProL), 876 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/news_ProL.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.