Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for *néwos ḱóino

Channel

*néwos ḱóino

@newoskoino

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,188subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001967210669
TypeChannel
Username@newoskoino
Created22 July 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/newoskoino

Growth

1,1841,1881,1867 August 2026 — 1,184 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,184 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,186 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,185 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,188 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 9 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,183–1,189 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 19:551,188+3
13 Aug 2026, 13:071,185-1
10 Aug 2026, 22:141,186+2
8 Aug 2026, 03:141,184no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:161,184first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 25 June 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

430 reactions across 8 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
12128.1%
custom 537554866214535902811226.0%
🔥10123.5%
🫡6014.0%
👍81.86%
👀51.16%
🐳40.93%
💅40.93%
30.698%
💊30.698%
😁30.698%
💩20.465%
🤯20.465%
👎10.233%
🤩10.233%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 430reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2025 to 30 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Mar 2026, 06:32 UTCviews —

*néwos ḱóino pinned «Просимо звернути увагу. В ході бойових дій на сході України в травні головний адмін та власник каналу *néwos ḱóino втратив доступ до свого акаунту. Згідно з політикою телеграму, ми не маємо повних гарантій про подальше функціонування цього ТГК у довгостроковій…»

1 Aug 2025, 15:48 UTC≈4,680 views72 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Просимо звернути увагу. В ході бойових дій на сході України в травні головний адмін та власник каналу *néwos ḱóino втратив доступ до свого акаунту. Згідно з політикою телеграму, ми не маємо повних гарантій про подальше функціонування цього ТГК у довгостроковій перспективі. У разі, якщо це виявиться реальним розвитком подій, ми запрошуємо всіх підписатися на новий канал, що буде продовженням/перезапуском Невоскойно

🫡55👍65😁3🤯2🔥1

31 Jul 2025, 17:24 UTC≈4,400 views61 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Еволюція слова "вода" в індоєвропейських мовах.

🔥506🐳4👀1

30 Jul 2025, 18:20 UTC≈5,210 views76 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Херсонський ренесанс, або Як ми все ж таки знайшли ту саму прабатьківщину, і навіть не на «Південній дузі» Відповідь на тезу покійного Л. Клейна – без негативу, але з незгодою. Він казав, що неможливо всіх індоєвропейців зібрати в один культурний кошик. Мовляв, "археологічно спрощено" та "лінгвістично непереконливо". Що Ямна культура "надто пізня і надто проста, щоб бути прародителькою такого складного явища, як пр

custom 537554866214535902841🔥17133💊2

22 Jul 2025, 22:01 UTC≈2,140 views98 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Нам 2 роки йоу 🥳🎉

46custom 537554866214535902842👀4💅4💩2

3 Jul 2025, 03:53 UTCviews —

The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 2 months. If they remain inactive for the next 30 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.

2 Jul 2025, 15:04 UTC≈3,690 views52 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#лінгвістика Еволюція кількісного числівника "чотири" в індоєвропейських мовах.

🔥3021💊1

30 Jun 2025, 15:48 UTC≈2,380 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Також рекомендуємо вам підписатися на наш канал, присвячений антропологічному розбору людей без коупу та політизованої упередженості

custom 537554866214535902818🫡5

30 Jun 2025, 15:40 UTC≈2,060 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @CraniossPhoto

Борис Миколайович Мозолевський – український археолог і літератор, дослідник скіфської старовини, автор книги «Скіфський степ» Етнічне походження: Українське Расовий тип: Борребю з впливом Динарида Лицьовий індекс: Юрипросопія Головний індекс: Брахіцефалія Носовий індекс: Лепторінія Орбітний індекс: Хамеконхія Висотний індекс: Гіпсікранія Висота лиця: Велика Висота чола: Велика Висота підборіддя: Велика Висота пер

15custom 537554866214535902811🔥3👍1👎1

25 Jun 2025, 15:04 UTC≈1,630 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Золота сарматська фібула у вигляді динамічного дельфіна з поховання знатної жінки в Ногайчинському кургані, Крим. Датована кінцем I ст. до н.е., зберігається в Музеї історичних коштовностей України. Корпус прикраси виготовлений з прозорого гірського кришталю, а голова та хвіст - з золота та бронзи. Завдовжки 7,8 см, діаметр головної частини 10 мм. Образ дельфіна може вказувати на елліністичний мотив, техніка та кошт

15👍1🤩1

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @newoskoino. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,000,898 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“*néwos ḱóino” (@newoskoino), 1,188 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/newoskoino.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.