Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

new era

@newerasqd

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

69subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002567236884
TypeChannel
Username@newerasqd
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/newerasqd

Growth

6912 Aug 2026, 04:17 — 69 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 04:30 — 69 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 04:1712 Aug 2026, 04:30
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 68–70 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 04:3069no change
12 Aug 2026, 04:1769first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 18 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
186.7%
avg views ÷ 69 subscribers
Avg views / post
129
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.19%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held11 (18 July 20268 August 2026)
Views total1,417
Reactions total116
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 04:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
579
Videos
95
Links
20

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
25s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

116 reactions across 11 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 51972025288858181213933.6%
custom 52247212905893853721613.8%
custom 52649191951827159651512.9%
custom 57805990348969784971512.9%
custom 53799587002051777131210.3%
custom 547465942195714581386.90%
custom 546098843367978833865.17%
custom 547447621583216472232.59%
custom 601504549840093636621.72%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 116reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 17:40 UTC58 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Сегодня на концерте ЗоХа Очень мало исполнителей сейчас выступает "live band", и очень мало живой музыки. Рад что нахожусь на их концерте

custom 51972025288858181214custom 52247212905893853721custom 60150454984009363661

Signed Кактуз

8 Aug 2026, 17:39 UTC58 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 51972025288858181212custom 52247212905893853722custom 53799587002051777132

Signed Кактуз

6 Aug 2026, 07:46 UTC78 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 51972025288858181217custom 54609884336797883383custom 52247212905893853722custom 53799587002051777131

Signed Кактуз

28 Jul 2026, 15:51 UTC136 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 51972025288858181216custom 57805990348969784974custom 54744762158321647223custom 53799587002051777131

Signed Кактуз

23 Jul 2026, 22:17 UTC190 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Был на последнем их концерте, и не просто, а даже в гримёрке🌟 F легендам, спасибо за детство🌟

custom 526491919518271596514custom 57805990348969784977

Signed Кактуз

22 Jul 2026, 08:10 UTC205 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Atlanta fest 2026 — незабываемые эмоции🌟 Безумнейший лайнап. Почти всех артистов я слушаю и мечтал побывать у них на концерте. Слемы были просто убийственные, побывал почти во всех🤩 Моё пребывание там скрасили близкие кенты и знакомые из "тетчис сквад". Спасибо им огромное🤩 Ливень очень жёстко ударил по оборудованию и по настроению. Но без него не было бы таких непередоваемых эмоций💀 Залутали халявные крутые футб

custom 51972025288858181219custom 57805990348969784974custom 54609884336797883383custom 52649191951827159651

Signed Кактуз

19 Jul 2026, 22:05 UTC156 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @match_tvPhoto

🇪🇸🇪🇸🇪🇸 ИСПАНИЯ!! ИСПАНИЯ!! ИСПАНИЯ!! ДВУКРАТНЫЕ ЧЕМПИОНЫ МИРА!!

custom 54746594219571458138custom 51972025288858181213custom 60150454984009363661

Signed Кактуз

19 Jul 2026, 22:05 UTC136 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Я рад🇪🇸🇪🇸 ⚡️ Ламин Ямаль – первый игрок в истории футбола, выигравший ЧМ и Евро к 19 годам: испанец сделал это 19 июля, выступая под 19-м номером – спустя 19 лет после того, как его искупал в ванночке 19-летний Месси, который тогда играл за «Барсу» под 19-м номером

custom 53799587002051777138

Signed Кактуз

18 Jul 2026, 23:15 UTC141 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @match_tvPhoto

ЪЫХАЪФАХФПАФЪАХМЪХАФПФЪХА.

custom 52247212905893853725

Signed Кактуз

18 Jul 2026, 23:15 UTC124 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Я просто оставлю это здесь: Самый не купленный матч в истории футбола

custom 52247212905893853726

Signed Кактуз

18 Jul 2026, 15:54 UTC135 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Два дауна☠️

custom 51972025288858181218

Signed オレグ

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @newerasqd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 814,478 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“new era” (@newerasqd), 69 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/newerasqd.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.