Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Don't Speak & One to One | школа английского | партнерская программа

@newdontspeak

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

252subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001901219194
TypeChannel
Username@newdontspeak
DescriptionКанал о том, как заговорить по-английски быстро и без лишних усилий. Был Don't - стал Speak! Отзывы и результаты: @dontspeakfeedback Узнать про обучение: @dontspeakschool Сайт: dont-speak.ru
CreatedBetween 1 March 2023 and 30 November 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/newdontspeak

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (4 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@dontspeakchannel/149418 Dec 2025, 12:06 UTC@newdontspeak/33 · this entry18 Dec 2025, 12:07 UTC1.0072 seconds
@dontspeakchannel/149826 Dec 2025, 09:15 UTC@newdontspeak/37 · this entry26 Dec 2025, 09:16 UTC1.0072 seconds
@dontspeakchannel/14997 Jan 2026, 15:57 UTC@newdontspeak/38 · this entry7 Jan 2026, 15:58 UTC1.002 minutes
@dontspeakchannel/150323 Jan 2026, 14:35 UTC@newdontspeak/41 · this entry23 Jan 2026, 14:35 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@dontspeakchannel7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9972 seconds@dontspeakchannel (61)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 5 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 16 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 December 2025 to 15 April 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @dontspeakchannel. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

2526 Aug 2026, 04:02 — 252 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 02:17 — 252 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 04:027 Aug 2026, 02:17
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 251–253 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 02:17252no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:02252first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 6 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
11
Videos
8
Links
9

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

167 reactions across 15 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥6538.9%
👍4828.7%
169.58%
🙏127.19%
🎉105.99%
😁42.40%
🤗42.40%
🎄21.20%
👌21.20%
👎21.20%
🤝21.20%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 167reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 6 December 2025 to 15 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Apr 2026, 08:12 UTC160 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Всем привет! Мы на финишной прямой по технической готовности инструмента, о котором говорили. Завтра утром дам ссылку на получение своей партнерской ссылки на бесплатный вебинар. Сам вебинар планируем в эту субботу в 12 часов по мск

👍5🔥32

25 Mar 2026, 16:18 UTC269 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

провели встречу, предварительно в субботу будет готова ссылка для каждого, кто хочет пригласить знакомых на вебинар. Вебинар общий для приглашенных пройдет в следующую субботу 4 апреля в 11:11 по мск. Еще напишу, будьте на связи

👍52

24 Mar 2026, 11:53 UTC244 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Сейчас часто включают белые списки на мобильной связи. В это время не работает телеграм и другие сервисы и сайты. И многие VPN в том числе не работают. Чтобы не потеряться, мы будем дублировать информацию в канале в МАХе: https://max.ru/join/-7van-Q7BWDuv6OnYoTdmSRiK2wOnX3lqs5GGO5h73E

🔥3👍2👎2

24 Mar 2026, 08:00 UTC392 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Hello! Завтра в 18:15 по мск общий созвон с партнерами и потенциальными партнерами Don't Speak & One to One. Встречу будем вести вместе с Андреем Гуляевым, основателем методики Don't Speak. Мы расскажем о новом полезном, удобном, понятном инструменте для партнеров и потенциальных партнеров. И расскажем какой план по мероприятиям. В следующую среду уже планируем вебинар для тех, кому потенциально интересно изучение

🔥5

23 Jan 2026, 14:35 UTC442 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Английская пунктуальность Есть английский чай, английский завтрак, английский кекс. А есть английская пунктуальность. В Англии супер важно быть вовремя. Там не терпят опоздания. Думаю, это один из важных факторов успеха. "Better three hours too soon than a minute too late" Shakespeare «Лучше прийти на три часа раньше, чем на минуту позже» Шекспир В разных странах по разному обстоят дела с пунктуальностью. Например

👍121

20 Jan 2026, 12:08 UTC365 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Результат, который виден и слышно! Хочу поделиться нашим восторгом от школы английского языка «Don't speak»! Моя дочь занимается здесь всего 3 месяца, и прогресс поразительный. Занятия проходят всего 2 раза в неделю по 15 минут, но эффект колоссальный. Дочь начала говорить на английском легко и естественно, без скучной зубрежки. Самый яркий показатель — ее преподаватель в колледже был удивлен уровнем понимания и ч

🎉8👍5🔥2

16 Jan 2026, 09:10 UTC364 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Если бы вам дали паспорт любой другой страны, которую вы хотите, загрузили в голову высокий уровень английского языка, что бы вы сделали? (опрос анонимный)

  1. Переехали бы в другую страну (из России или СНГ)26%
  2. Оставили все, как есть сейчас14%
  3. Попробовали бы остаться жить в России (или СНГ), но выстроить доход на англоязычном рынке35%
  4. Остались бы жить в России (или СНГ), но сменили бы сферу деятельности14%
  5. Я живу не в России и не в странах СНГ2%
  6. Посмотреть результаты9%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Jan 2026, 15:58 UTC534 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year! 🍬 Желаю в этом году подняться как минимум на одну ступеньку по шкале уровней английского. А кто находится на высоком уровне, тому — не потерять навыки. Ещё желаю, чтобы у вас были возможности для международных путешествий и больше поводов для общения с людьми из разных стран! И, конечно, мира, добра, любви и терпения!

🙏12🤗4🎄2🎉2

26 Dec 2025, 09:16 UTC424 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Встал и ушел. Очень короткое интервью. Давно хотел прокомментировать это интервью: https://www.youtube.com/live/uswRbWyt_pg Основатель википедии Jimmy Wales Джимми Уэльс пришел на интервью и ушел после первого вопроса. Ведущий проявил настойчивость в вопросе, фаундер он или кофаундер (основатель или сооснователь). После чего, Джимми Уэльс встал и ушел. Дело в том, что некоторые издания говорят, что основателей был

😁42🔥2

24 Dec 2025, 07:31 UTC302 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Зачем учить иностранные языки, если нейросети переводят в режиме онлайн. В. В. Путин владеет английским и немецким, при этом немецким в совершенстве.

👍4🔥31

22 Dec 2025, 14:41 UTC≈1,460 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Поздравляем Яна Хлистуна с успешным завершением уровня Elementary и поступлением на курс Pre-Intermediate! 🥳 У нас сейчас учится 13 человек в рамках новой концепции в сотрудничестве с One to One. Спасибо этим людям за доверие! Это пока маленькие цифры, но все еще впереди! Ближайшая наша цель - 100 одновременно обучающихся. Хочу сделать это совместно с вами до марта 2026.

🔥134👌2

18 Dec 2025, 12:07 UTC366 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Какое произношение у Макрона? Британское или американское? 😁 Помню, я тестировал рекламу с заголовком про произношение. «Как поставить американское/английское произношение» «Как избавиться от русского акцента». И кликабельность заголовка "как избавиться от русского акцента" была запредельной. Людей это волнует и беспокоит. Открою вам страшную тайну. Во всем мире акцент - это нормально. Причем наш slavic accent од

👍7

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @newdontspeak. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

16 Jan 2026, 09:10 UTCAnonymous Poll43 voters

Если бы вам дали паспорт любой другой страны, которую вы хотите, загрузили в голову высокий уровень английского языка, что бы вы сделали? (опрос анонимный)

  1. Переехали бы в другую страну (из России или СНГ)26%
  2. Оставили все, как есть сейчас14%
  3. Попробовали бы остаться жить в России (или СНГ), но выстроить доход на англоязычном рынке35%
  4. Остались бы жить в России (или СНГ), но сменили бы сферу деятельности14%
  5. Я живу не в России и не в странах СНГ2%
  6. Посмотреть результаты9%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 6 December 2025 to 15 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 22,413 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Don't Speak & One to One | школа английского | партнерская программа” (@newdontspeak), 252 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/newdontspeak.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.