Channel
@newdastak
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,509subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001011471762 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @newdastak |
| Created | Between 1 December 2015 and 31 March 2016— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/newdastak |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:24 | 2,509 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:35 | 2,510 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:25 | 2,512 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:34 | 2,510 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 18:45 | 2,510 | first reading |
22 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 18 of 22 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 22 (30 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 20,082 |
| Reactions total | 128 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 16:26 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
69 reactions across 15 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 36 | 52.2% | |
| 💔 | 20 | 29.0% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 7.25% | |
| 😭 | 3 | 4.35% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 2.90% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 2.90% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 1.45% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 128reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📖حکایت چوپانی عادت داشت تا در یک مکان معین زیر یک درخت بنشیند و گله گوسفندان را برای چرا در اطراف آنجا نگه دارد.زیر درخت سه قطعه سنگ بود که چوپان همیشه از آنها برای آتش درست کردن استفاده میکرد و برای خود چای آماده میکرد. هر بار که او آتشی میان سنگها میافروخت متوجه میشد که یکی از سنگها مادامی که آتش روشن است سرد است اما دلیل آن را نمیدانست. چند بار سعی کرد با عوض کردن جای سنگها چیزی دستگیرش شود اما همچنان در هر…
❤3
🔺🔻کالابرگ مرداد حدود ۴۰ میلیون نفر از هموطنان شارژ شد 🔹معاون رفاه وزارت تعاون، کار و رفاه اجتماعی با اعلام اینکه یک میلیون و ۵۰۰ هزار نفر از مردم اعتبار تیر خود را استفاده نکردهاند گفت: این گروه از متقاضیان تا پایان مرداد فرصت خرید دارند. @newdastak
🤣2
🌊 پیش بینی دریایی پنج روزه سواحل استان گیلان - اداره هواشناسی دریایی ❗️شرایط دریای خزر برای شنا بتدریج طی پنجشنبه تا ظهر جمعه نامناسب پیش بینی شده است. هواشناسی استان گیلان @newdastak
❤2
🌾*هشدار سطح زرد هواشناسی کشاورزی* 🟡 برای رگبار، رعدوبرق و وزش باد به ویژه در ارتفاعات و دامنهها طی پنجشنبه تا صبح جمعه ۱۵ و ۱۶ مرداد ۱۴۰۵ هواشناسی استان گیلان @newdastak
لیست میانگین IQ کشورهای مختلف در سال ۲۰۲۶: ۱- 🇰🇷 کره جنوبی: ۱۰۶.۹۷ ۲- 🇨🇳 چین: ۱۰۶.۴۸ ۳- 🇯🇵 ژاپن: ۱۰۶.۳۰ ۴- 🇮🇷 ایران: ۱۰۴.۸۰ ۵- 🇦🇺 استرالیا: ۱۰۴.۴۵ ➖➖➖➖ @newdastak
❤4💔1
🔵 پیش بینی جوی شش روزه استان گیلان 🔷 نقشههای هواشناسی نشاندهنده استقرار و تقویت توده هوای گرم و مرطوب در منطقه است. بر این اساس طی امروز و فردا (سه شنبه و چهارشنبه) آسمانی صاف تا نیمه ابری، گاهی افزایش ابر و وزش باد (پارهای نواحی موقتی شدید) پیش بینی می شود. 🔷 طی این مدت با گاهی با شکلگیری ناپایداریهای همرفتی و موقتی، شرایط برای افزایش ابر، رگبار و رعد و برق پراکنده (به ویژه ارتفاعات و دامنه ها ) فراهم است. …
❤1
کارت امید مادر برای متولدین ۴ ماه اول سال شارژ شد 🔹وزارت کار: اعتبار ۲ میلیون تومانی برای فرزندان متولد چهار ماهۀ نخست سال در قالب کالابرگ الکترونیکی به حساب مادران مشمول واریز شد. 🔹این اعتبار شامل ۲۷۰ هزار و ۷۳۶ کودک متولد شده در این بازه زمانی میشود. @newdastak
‼️ شارژ کالابرگ جدید از ۱۵ مرداد 🔻 مرحله جدید کالابرگ از ۱۵ مرداد برای افراد با کد ملی پایانیافته به ۰، ۱ و ۲ آغاز میشود و سایر افراد در روزهای ۲۰ و ۲۵ مرداد شارژ خواهند شد. @newdastak
ابلاغ تعرفه جدید شالیکوبی همزمان با آغاز فصل برداشت برنج 🔹رئیس سازمان جهاد کشاورزی گیلان: نرخ کارمزد تبدیل شالی برداشت مستقیم برای واحدهای مدرن به ازای هر کیلوگرم شالی ۸۴ هزار ریال و برای واحدهای سنتی ۷۷ هزار ریال تعیین شده است. 🔹همچنین نرخ کارمزد تبدیل شالی خشکشده برای واحدهای مدرن ۸۲ هزار ریال و برای واحدهای سنتی ۷۴ هزار ریال به ازای هر کیلوگرم شالی خواهد بود. 🔹کشاورزان باید پس از تبدیل شالی، کارمزد مربوطه را ب…
❤4
قابل توجه کشاورزان عزیز اعلام تعرفه برداشت مکانیزه برنج در سال ۱۴۰۵ قابل ذکر است نرخ های تعیین شده برای شرایط متعارف بوده و در شرایط غیر متعارف هرگونه توافقی بین کشاورز و دستگاه دار به شرط انجام بموقع بلامانع است و در صورت بروز اختلاف نرخ تعیین شده ملاک عمل خواهد بود @newdastak
❤1🤯1
هنوز نمیدونی LSF دقیقاً چیه و چرا همه دارن ازش حرف میزنن؟ 😎🤔 ما اینجاییم تا بهصورت رایگان همهی سوالاتت رو جواب بدیم! 💬 سازهت رو آگاهانه انتخاب کن 💪 یه تماس کوچیک، شاید شروع یه خونهی بزرگ باشه 🏡 📞 مشاوره و بازدید رایگان ☎️ 0935 064 6376 📲 @LSF_Golshahii
👍2
مراسم دهه پایانی ماه صفر همراه با نماز جماعت مغرب و عشا با سخنرانی حجت الاسلام والمسلمین بابایی زمان دوشنبه 1405/05/12 مکان مسجد جامع دستک هیئت امنا مسجد جامع و مسجد صاحب الزمان عج دستک
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @newdastak. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 636,842 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@newdastak named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“دستک” (@newdastak), 2,509 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/newdastak.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.