Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

🧬⚛🧬НОВЫЕ ВЕКА🛸

@newcenturies

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

188subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001330910547
TypeChannel
Username@newcenturies
DescriptionСообщество в вк https://vk.com/newcenturies
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/newcenturies

Growth

1887 Aug 2026, 16:50 — 188 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 12:04 — 188 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 16:508 Aug 2026, 12:04
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 187–189 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 12:04188no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:50188first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 14 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,380
Videos
685
Links
521

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2h 34m
Average length
19m 19s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍150.0%
😁150.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 14 May 2026 to 28 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Jun 2026, 10:54 UTC66 viewsread 8 August 2026

Освоение Южного Китая осуществлял помощник Хуанди Чи Ю с несколькими десятками «братьев». Вполне возможно, что эти «братья» представляли собой механизмы-роботы, так как древние источники сообщают о наличии у них шести рук, четырёх глаз, трезубцев вместо ушей. Они могли преодолевать препятствия, ненадолго взлетая в воздух. В нескольких местах источники упоминают, что пищей для Чи Ю служили камни, песок и даже железо.

18 Jun 2026, 10:54 UTC78 viewsread 8 August 2026

В центре Алтаря размещалась каменная плита, вокруг которой были выложены плиты меньших размеров, образующие своеобразные кольца, напоминающие орбиты вращения планет. В Храме Неба преобладал голубой цвет, в котором были исполнены церемониальные одежды, дорожки, жертвенная посуда, навесы над проходами к императорскому шатру. Сам император при проведении церемоний облачался в одеяние, на котором были вышиты Солнце, Луна

18 Jun 2026, 10:54 UTC49 viewsread 8 August 2026

✅ Письменные источники, подтверждающие существование предыдущих ЦИВИЛИЗАЦИЙ К ним прежде всего относятся индийские эпосы «Веды», «Рамаяна», «Махабхарата», славянские источники, сочинения Платона «Тимей» и «Критий», священное писание индейцев киче народности майя «Пополь-Вух», а также обширная мифология народов мира. Прежде чем раскрывать мифологию народов мира, нам необходимо разобраться в том, что является настояще

18 Jun 2026, 10:54 UTC50 viewsread 8 August 2026

Из самого центра яйца вышел человек, Обладатель магической силы…» Не удивительно, что первый из людей, обладавших «магической силой», Хуан-ди нашёл в сказаниях, легендах и в древних текстах множество описаний, которые вполне можно понять, будучи знакомым с техническими достижениями XX и XXI веков. В этих описаниях много неумышленно искажённого, но все вместе они подводят к мысли, что человек «магической силы» облада

16 May 2026, 08:55 UTC95 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ApocalypseRazumaVideo

https://t.me/ApocalypseRazuma

😁1

16 May 2026, 08:35 UTC79 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ApocalypseRazumaVideo

Бал сатаны https://t.me/ApocalypseRazuma

16 May 2026, 08:19 UTC75 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ApocalypseRazumaVideo

https://t.me/ApocalypseRazuma

16 May 2026, 08:06 UTC72 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ApocalypseRazumaVideo

https://t.me/ApocalypseRazuma

16 May 2026, 08:05 UTC67 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ApocalypseRazumaVideo

https://t.me/ApocalypseRazuma

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @newcenturies. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 788,982 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🧬⚛🧬НОВЫЕ ВЕКА🛸” (@newcenturies), 188 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/newcenturies.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.