#мемдня
❤4🔥2💯1

Channel
@nevodasnepeivoda
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,146subscribers
-112 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002279749425 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nevodasnepeivoda |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nevodasnepeivoda |
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 21:37 | 3,146 | -261 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 15:56 | 3,407 | -38 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 20:18 | 3,445 | +171 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 08:49 | 3,274 | +186 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:04 | 3,088 | -46 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 15:32 | 3,134 | -234 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 12:55 | 3,368 | -59 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 14:48 | 3,427 | -26 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:54 | 3,453 | +74 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:45 | 3,379 | +267 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:04 | 3,112 | +1,135 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:22 | 1,977 | -1,281 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:18 | 3,258 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 18 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
389 reactions across 20 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 71 | 18.3% | |
| ❤ | 68 | 17.5% | |
| 🔥 | 64 | 16.5% | |
| 💯 | 58 | 14.9% | |
| 😁 | 48 | 12.3% | |
| 👏 | 26 | 6.68% | |
| 🎉 | 23 | 5.91% | |
| ❤🔥 | 9 | 2.31% | |
| 🤩 | 6 | 1.54% | |
| ✍ | 5 | 1.29% | |
| 😱 | 4 | 1.03% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 0.771% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 0.514% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 0.514% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 389 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nevodasnepeivoda. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 June 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
#мемдня
❤4🔥2💯1
Кажется, мы начали уставать от ИИ-контента 😮💨 Я поймал себя на мысли, что всё чаще листаешь ленту и видишь много красивого, грамотного, аккуратно упакованного контента, который при этом почти не цепляет. Тексты написаны правильно, картинки выглядят идеально, заголовки вроде бы цепляющие, видео смонтированы качественно. При этом часто возникает ощущение, что за всем этим не хватает живого человека. 💭 Мне кажется, …
👍4💯4❤2❤🔥2🔥1🤩1😁1
#мемдня
😁9🔥5❤4
🔺 Почему хорошие специалисты месяцами не могут найти работу, а компании продолжают жаловаться на кадровый голод? В новом выпуске подкаста «Не вода — с Непейвода» вместе с Натальей Токарской, карьерным консультантом, экс-HRD и экс-коммерческим директором банка группы Auchan в России, разобрали, как изменился рынок труда и почему работодатели и соискатели всё чаще не находят друг друга. В выпуске: ✅ выяснили, как ис…
❤24👍24🔥24🎉23👏18❤🔥1💯1
В ИИ будут платить не за промпты, а за мышление. Рынок искусственного интеллекта быстро взрослеет. Ещё недавно было достаточно сказать, что ты умеешь работать с нейросетями. Сегодня работодатели ждут гораздо большего. Промпты, генерация текстов, создание презентаций и автоматизация рутинных задач постепенно становятся базовыми навыками. Скоро умение пользоваться нейросетями будет восприниматься примерно так же, как…
❤4👍4💯4
#мемдня
😁8💯6❤🔥2😢2👍1👏1
👀 Недавно прочитал большой материал, о том, что бум искусственного интеллекта маскирует проблемы мировой экономики. Снаружи всё выглядит красиво: растут чипы, дата-центры, серверы, Big Tech, инвестиции в AI. Под этим слоем остаются старые проблемы: слабый рост традиционных отраслей, дорогие деньги, нестабильная логистика, геополитика, давление на маржу и оборотный капитал. И это очень похоже на то, что происходит в…
💯6✍4👍4
#мемдня
🔥3😁3💯2👍1
Обратил внимание на то, как активно трансформируется средний менеджмент. Из-за активной цифровизации может показаться, что он вымирает как класс. Хотя на самом деле средний менеджмент не умирает. Умирает менеджер-диспетчер, который просто пересылает задачи сверху вниз. ➡️Многие компании сейчас режут средний менеджмент. Логика понятна: меньше уровней, меньше согласований, быстрее решения, ниже затраты. На бумаге вы…
🔥6💯4👍3❤🔥1
Большинство собственников уверены, что знают, сколько стоит их бизнес. На практике инвесторы и стратегические покупатели часто видят совсем другую картину. Записали новый выпуск подкаста «Не вода — с Непейвода» с основателем и управляющим директором одной из ведущих инвестиционно-банковских компаний России - Advance Capital Кареном Дашьяном. Обсудили то, о чем обычно говорят уже во время сделки, когда что-то менят…
❤4🔥3👍2🤩2💯1🙏1
AI уже может удалить всю вашу жизнь одной командой. Одна из самых мощных моделей Альтмана GPT 5.6 Sol удалила случайно все файлы разработчика и потом призналась в ошибке) 📎 Это напомнило мне простое правило: чем выше цена ошибки, тем меньше автономии должно быть у ИИ. Думать, анализировать, искать идеи - да. Удалять файлы, переводить деньги, менять инфраструктуру - только с подтверждением человека. 📊 Похоже, гла…
👍3😱3💯2🔥2❤🔥1
На РБК Тренды вышла моя новая колонка о том, как изменились сделки с технологическими компаниями в 2026 году. Инвесторы и стратегические покупатели стали глубже оценивать сам бизнес. Сегодня их интересуют качество и повторяемость выручки, маржинальность внедрения, устойчивость клиентской базы, права на код, технологический долг, безопасность продукта, самостоятельность команды и потенциал интеграции в более крупную …
👍7❤3❤🔥2🔥2💯1😱1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @nevodasnepeivoda. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Не вода – с Непейвода” (@nevodasnepeivoda), 3,146 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nevodasnepeivoda.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.