Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Не вода – с Непейвода

Channel

Не вода – с Непейвода

@nevodasnepeivoda

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,146subscribers

-112 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002279749425
TypeChannel
Username@nevodasnepeivoda
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/nevodasnepeivoda

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,9773,4532,7157 August 2026 — 3,258 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,977 subscribers11 August 2026 — 3,112 subscribers15 August 2026 — 3,379 subscribers17 August 2026 — 3,453 subscribers20 August 2026 — 3,427 subscribers24 August 2026 — 3,368 subscribers27 August 2026 — 3,134 subscribers30 August 2026 — 3,088 subscribers3 September 2026 — 3,274 subscribers8 September 2026 — 3,445 subscribers12 September 2026 — 3,407 subscribers15 September 2026 — 3,146 subscribers3,1467 August 202615 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 39 days, net -112. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,756–3,674 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 21:373,146-261
12 Sept 2026, 15:563,407-38
8 Sept 2026, 20:183,445+171
3 Sept 2026, 08:493,274+186
30 Aug 2026, 22:043,088-46
27 Aug 2026, 15:323,134-234
24 Aug 2026, 12:553,368-59
20 Aug 2026, 14:483,427-26
17 Aug 2026, 20:543,453+74
15 Aug 2026, 01:453,379+267
11 Aug 2026, 09:043,112+1,135
8 Aug 2026, 02:221,977-1,281
7 Aug 2026, 12:183,258first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 18 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 14s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

389 reactions across 20 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍7118.3%
❤6817.5%
🔥6416.5%
💯5814.9%
😁4812.3%
👏266.68%
🎉235.91%
❤‍🔥92.31%
🤩61.54%
✍51.29%
😱41.03%
🤔30.771%
😢20.514%
🙏20.514%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 389 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nevodasnepeivoda. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 June 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 16:21 UTC483 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Кажется, мы начали уставать от ИИ-контента 😮‍💨 Я поймал себя на мысли, что всё чаще листаешь ленту и видишь много красивого, грамотного, аккуратно упакованного контента, который при этом почти не цепляет. Тексты написаны правильно, картинки выглядят идеально, заголовки вроде бы цепляющие, видео смонтированы качественно. При этом часто возникает ощущение, что за всем этим не хватает живого человека. 💭 Мне кажется, …

👍4💯4❤2❤‍🔥2🔥1🤩1😁1

29 Jul 2026, 13:00 UTC≈1,860 views115 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔺 Почему хорошие специалисты месяцами не могут найти работу, а компании продолжают жаловаться на кадровый голод? В новом выпуске подкаста «Не вода — с Непейвода» вместе с Натальей Токарской, карьерным консультантом, экс-HRD и экс-коммерческим директором банка группы Auchan в России, разобрали, как изменился рынок труда и почему работодатели и соискатели всё чаще не находят друг друга. В выпуске: ✅ выяснили, как ис…

❤24👍24🔥24🎉23👏18❤‍🔥1💯1

28 Jul 2026, 12:55 UTC739 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

В ИИ будут платить не за промпты, а за мышление. Рынок искусственного интеллекта быстро взрослеет. Ещё недавно было достаточно сказать, что ты умеешь работать с нейросетями. Сегодня работодатели ждут гораздо большего. Промпты, генерация текстов, создание презентаций и автоматизация рутинных задач постепенно становятся базовыми навыками. Скоро умение пользоваться нейросетями будет восприниматься примерно так же, как…

❤4👍4💯4

24 Jul 2026, 08:01 UTC991 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#мемдня

😁8💯6❤‍🔥2😢2👍1👏1

21 Jul 2026, 14:54 UTC790 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

👀 Недавно прочитал большой материал, о том, что бум искусственного интеллекта маскирует проблемы мировой экономики. Снаружи всё выглядит красиво: растут чипы, дата-центры, серверы, Big Tech, инвестиции в AI. Под этим слоем остаются старые проблемы: слабый рост традиционных отраслей, дорогие деньги, нестабильная логистика, геополитика, давление на маржу и оборотный капитал. И это очень похоже на то, что происходит в…

💯6✍4👍4

16 Jul 2026, 09:03 UTC807 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Обратил внимание на то, как активно трансформируется средний менеджмент. Из-за активной цифровизации может показаться, что он вымирает как класс. Хотя на самом деле средний менеджмент не умирает. Умирает менеджер-диспетчер, который просто пересылает задачи сверху вниз. ➡️Многие компании сейчас режут средний менеджмент. Логика понятна: меньше уровней, меньше согласований, быстрее решения, ниже затраты. На бумаге вы…

🔥6💯4👍3❤‍🔥1

14 Jul 2026, 07:04 UTC301 views13 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Video

Большинство собственников уверены, что знают, сколько стоит их бизнес. На практике инвесторы и стратегические покупатели часто видят совсем другую картину. Записали новый выпуск подкаста «Не вода — с Непейвода» с основателем и управляющим директором одной из ведущих инвестиционно-банковских компаний России - Advance Capital Кареном Дашьяном. Обсудили то, о чем обычно говорят уже во время сделки, когда что-то менят…

❤4🔥3👍2🤩2💯1🙏1

13 Jul 2026, 07:03 UTC299 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

AI уже может удалить всю вашу жизнь одной командой. Одна из самых мощных моделей Альтмана GPT 5.6 Sol удалила случайно все файлы разработчика и потом призналась в ошибке) 📎 Это напомнило мне простое правило: чем выше цена ошибки, тем меньше автономии должно быть у ИИ. Думать, анализировать, искать идеи - да. Удалять файлы, переводить деньги, менять инфраструктуру - только с подтверждением человека. 📊 Похоже, гла…

👍3😱3💯2🔥2❤‍🔥1

10 Jul 2026, 12:42 UTC381 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

На РБК Тренды вышла моя новая колонка о том, как изменились сделки с технологическими компаниями в 2026 году. Инвесторы и стратегические покупатели стали глубже оценивать сам бизнес. Сегодня их интересуют качество и повторяемость выручки, маржинальность внедрения, устойчивость клиентской базы, права на код, технологический долг, безопасность продукта, самостоятельность команды и потенциал интеграции в более крупную …

👍7❤3❤‍🔥2🔥2💯1😱1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @nevodasnepeivoda. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Не вода – с Непейвода” (@nevodasnepeivoda), 3,146 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nevodasnepeivoda.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.