Котыыы💔
custom 53076900385894134966

Channel
@neveroyatnaya_volka07
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
101subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003592699258 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @neveroyatnaya_volka07 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 9 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/neveroyatnaya_volka07 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Sept 2026, 04:01 | 101 | -2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:26 | 103 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 05:30 | 104 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 05:16 | 104 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 9 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
175 reactions across 17 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5337235101438730053 | 72 | 41.1% | |
| custom 5307690038589413496 | 31 | 17.7% | |
| custom 5233594053072798341 | 23 | 13.1% | |
| custom 5228962497779740222 | 12 | 6.86% | |
| custom 5361683734619761146 | 9 | 5.14% | |
| custom 5820980940184229333 | 9 | 5.14% | |
| custom 5438473768437574180 | 8 | 4.57% | |
| 🕊 | 6 | 3.43% | |
| custom 5276280229789192637 | 3 | 1.71% | |
| custom 5316587595919021487 | 2 | 1.14% |
Custom emoji. 9 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 175 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 9 May 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @neveroyatnaya_volka07. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 May 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Котыыы💔
custom 53076900385894134966
Еще один,последний раз, твои глаза…в мои посмотрят и слеза..вдруг упадет.💔
custom 53076900385894134965🕊2custom 53616837346197611461
neveroyatnaya_volka pinned «Я, кстати, более активна сейчас тут https://t.me/pgagarina Если вдруг здесь есть люди, которые шарят, буду рада подписке 🤍»
Я, кстати, более активна сейчас тут https://t.me/pgagarina Если вдруг здесь есть люди, которые шарят, буду рада подписке 🤍
custom 53372351014387300536
Её НИ В КОЕМ СЛУЧАЕ НЕЛЬЗЯ ВЫБРОСИТЬ ПРАВИЛЬНО.
custom 533723510143873005312
Мой подаруночек ❤️🩹🤩
custom 53372351014387300539custom 52335940530727983414custom 53616837346197611462
мне бы очень хотелось прокомментировать последние сторисы Екатерины Волковой, но у меня даже не хватает словарного запаса, чтобы хоть как-то корректно высказаться по этому поводу. Мне непонятно лишь одно - почему за взрослую, пятидесятилетнюю женщину все решает рандомный левый человек, при это вечно используя местоимения «наши» и «мы». Как давно Катя перестала иметь что-то Свое, превратив все в «их» совместное? Молчу…
custom 53076900385894134966
шок прошел, пошли мемы
custom 53372351014387300535
Sticker, posted without a caption
custom 53372351014387300534
Как ощущается каждый вкид до сезона скорой:
custom 53372351014387300534
Катюшка подскочила на озвучку 🫰🏻🫰🏻🫰🏻
custom 53372351014387300535custom 52335940530727983412
Сегодня особенный день. Он объединяет мой личный праздник др — и наш общий — день фд, нашей Екатерины Юрьевны, поздравляю всех 🌸
custom 54384737684375741806custom 52289624977797402222
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @neveroyatnaya_volka07. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“neveroyatnaya_volka” (@neveroyatnaya_volka07), 101 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/neveroyatnaya_volka07.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.