Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for NEVA COMPUTER®

Channel

NEVA COMPUTER®

@nevacomputer

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

13,080subscribers

-110 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001195361398
TypeChannel
Username@nevacomputer
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held20
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/nevacomputer

Growth

13,08013,19013,1356 August 2026 — 13,190 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,190 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,182 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,180 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,178 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,170 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,162 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,160 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,150 subscribers16 August 2026 — 13,145 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,139 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,137 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,132 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,126 subscribers21 August 2026 — 13,120 subscribers23 August 2026 — 13,113 subscribers24 August 2026 — 13,104 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,096 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,086 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,080 subscribers6 August 202629 August 2026
20 measurements spanning 23 days, net -110. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,064–13,207 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 00:3413,080-6
26 Aug 2026, 23:0113,086-10
25 Aug 2026, 23:4213,096-8
24 Aug 2026, 22:4613,104-9
23 Aug 2026, 06:2713,113-7
21 Aug 2026, 15:4413,120-6
20 Aug 2026, 15:1213,126-6
19 Aug 2026, 14:5213,132-5
18 Aug 2026, 14:4513,137-2
17 Aug 2026, 12:4413,139-6
16 Aug 2026, 06:3413,145-5
14 Aug 2026, 20:3513,150-10
12 Aug 2026, 12:2313,160-2
11 Aug 2026, 13:0813,162-8
10 Aug 2026, 10:4213,170-8
9 Aug 2026, 07:5413,178-2
8 Aug 2026, 06:1413,180-2
7 Aug 2026, 05:0113,182-8
6 Aug 2026, 03:1513,190no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:0813,190first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 9 June 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 40 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

82 reactions across 6 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 97.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8097.6%
🔥22.44%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 82reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2025 to 1 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Mar 2026, 18:11 UTC≈4,000 views14 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

EASY TECH PRESENTS ONLY ONE AVAILABLE PCS ⚡️HP ELITEBOOK 835 G7 ⚡️RYZEN 5 PRO 4650 (ABOVE CORE I5 11TH GENERATION) ⚡️ BETTER THAN I7 10TH GENERATION ⚡️6 CORES & 12 LOGICAL PROCESSORS ⚡️13.3 SCREEN SIZE ⚡️🅡︎🅐︎🅜︎:16 𝗗𝗗𝗥4 ⚡️🅢︎🅣︎🅞︎🅡︎🅐︎🅖︎: 512SSD ssd ⚡️🅖︎🅡︎🅐︎🅟︎🅗︎🅘︎🅒︎🅢︎:AMD radeon ⚡️🅞︎🅢︎:𝘄𝗶𝗻𝗱𝗼𝘄𝘀 11 pro 22H2 ⚡️🅑︎🅐︎🅣︎🅣︎🅔︎🅡︎🅨︎: 7 HOURS Price 66,500 birr (including bag 🎒 and original charger) 📩@easytech16 ለአጭ

13🔥1

Signed NEVA

1 Mar 2026, 17:06 UTC≈3,340 views2 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

💻 Dell Precision Workstation A powerful performance laptop, ideal for professionals, engineers, and creators. ⸻ 🔷 Processor (CPU) Intel Core i7 – 9th Generation ⚙️ 8 Cores | 16 Threads | 🔥 Turbo Boost up to 4.7GHz ✅ Fast multitasking, great for heavy tasks like CAD, video editing & coding. ⸻ 💾 Memory (RAM) 🧠 32GB DDR4 RAM ⚡ Seamless performance even with multiple programs running 🎯 Ideal for multitasking, virtua

2

Signed NEVA

21 Oct 2025, 05:54 UTC≈6,760 views20 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Very portable and can do multi-task #HP 🅑︎🅡︎🅐︎🅝︎🅓︎ : HP ELITEBOOK ✨🅓︎🅘︎🅢︎🅟︎🅛︎🅐︎🅨︎:14” ✨🅒︎🅟︎🅤︎: CORE I7 11thgeneration ✨🅡︎🅐︎🅜︎:16 GB 𝗗𝗗𝗥4 ✨🅢︎🅣︎🅞︎🅡︎🅐︎🅖︎: 512 GB SSD ✨🅖︎raphics: intel uhd graphics ✨🅞︎🅢︎:window 11 pro ✨🅑︎🅐︎🅣︎🅣︎🅔︎🅡︎🅨︎: 6HR plus ✨🅢︎🅣︎🅐︎🅣︎🅤︎🅢︎: new Price 78k 📩@rasneva ለአጭር መልእክት ይደዉሉ ☎️ 🏢 አድራሻ: - መገናኛ ማራቶን የ ገበያ ማእከል በ ዋናው መግቢያ መሬት ላይ ወይንም ግራውንድ ፍሎር ብቅ ይበሉ 👉ነቫ ኮምፒውተር👈 መሆኑን ያረጋግጡ ድህረ ገጻችንን ይጎብኙ www.ne

20

Signed NEVA

21 Jun 2025, 06:32 UTC≈10,200 views18 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

💻 Dell Precision Workstation A powerful performance laptop, ideal for professionals, engineers, and creators. ⸻ 🔷 Processor (CPU) Intel Core i7 – 9th Generation ⚙️ 8 Cores | 16 Threads | 🔥 Turbo Boost up to 4.7GHz ✅ Fast multitasking, great for heavy tasks like CAD, video editing & coding. ⸻ 💾 Memory (RAM) 🧠 32GB DDR4 RAM ⚡ Seamless performance even with multiple programs running 🎯 Ideal for multitasking, virtua

17🔥1

Signed NEVA

11 Jun 2025, 13:56 UTC≈8,640 views14 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

LENOVO X1 YOGA Processor: 11th‑Gen Intel Core i7‑1165G7 or i7‑1185G7 (4 cores/8 threads, 2.8–4.7 GHz Turbo, 12 MB cache) • Memory: 16 GB LPDDR4x, soldered (non-upgradeable) • Storage: 512 GB NVMe PCIe SSD • Display: 14″ FHD+ (1920×1200) IPS, 400 nits, 10‑point multi-touch • Graphics: Intel Iris Xe integrated • Convertible Design: 360° hinge — use as laptop, tablet, tent, or stand • Pen Included: Slim integrated

14

Signed NEVA

9 Jun 2025, 21:37 UTC≈7,000 views14 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

🔥 Acer Nitro 5 – Power Meets Performance 💻 Display 🖥️ 15.6” Full HD (1920×1080) IPS Panel | 🎯 144Hz (smooth gameplay & crisp visuals) ⚙️ Processor 🧠 Intel Core i5 🔟th Generation ⚡ Strong performance for gaming, multitasking, and creative work 🎮 Graphics Card 🎨 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti 🕹️ 4GB GDDR6 – Play modern games like GTA V, FIFA, COD, Valorant, and more ✨ Real-time Ray Tracing & DLSS for stunning graphics

14

Signed NEVA

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @nevacomputer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 186,160 of 1,624,174entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“NEVA COMPUTER®” (@nevacomputer), 13,080 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nevacomputer.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.