Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Любовь Сафронова | НЕЙРОПСИХОЛОГ

Channel

Любовь Сафронова | НЕЙРОПСИХОЛОГ

@neuropsy_safronova

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

204subscribers

+13 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002725353862
TypeChannel
Username@neuropsy_safronova
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 31 August 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/neuropsy_safronova

Topic

Parenting & family — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

191204197.57 August 2026 — 191 subscribers8 August 2026 — 191 subscribers15 August 2026 — 193 subscribers22 August 2026 — 195 subscribers29 August 2026 — 199 subscribers8 September 2026 — 202 subscribers16 September 2026 — 204 subscribers7 August 202616 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 41 days, net +13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 189–206 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 19:55204+2
8 Sept 2026, 12:00202+3
29 Aug 2026, 10:05199+4
22 Aug 2026, 19:26195+2
15 Aug 2026, 06:04193+2
8 Aug 2026, 04:55191no change
7 Aug 2026, 07:17191first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 5 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

226 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤10646.9%
🔥4921.7%
👍4720.8%
🍾104.42%
😍62.65%
💯31.33%
🙏31.33%
🎉10.442%
👻10.442%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 226 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 06:34 UTC35 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Дети хотят делать то, что хочется, а взрослые говорят "надо", "ты должен". У детей ВОПРОСЫ: Кому это надо? Почему я кому то должен? Говоря ребенку "надо", стоит самим понимать, что мы хотим ему этим дать. Когда мы говорим, что НУЖНО учиться, прикладывать усилия, мы делаем это НЕ ради оценок, НЕ ради галочки и НЕ потому, что "так принято". Мы хотим дать ребенку возможность выбора в будущем. Но выбор появляется т…

👍4❤1🔥1

1 Aug 2026, 12:31 UTC58 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤3

1 Aug 2026, 12:25 UTC56 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥2

1 Aug 2026, 12:23 UTC55 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥1

1 Aug 2026, 12:14 UTC52 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤5

1 Aug 2026, 09:55 UTC60 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

То, что определяет успех ребенка. Почти никто не замечает. 🔠🔠 тогда, когда получает пятёрку. 🔠🔠 тогда, когда выходит на сцену. 🔠🔠 тогда, когда выигрывает соревнование. Гораздо раньше. В тот момент, когда выбирает: ✅сесть и сделать; ✅ещё раз попробовать; ✅не бросить после ошибки; ✅закончить начатое. Мы часто восхищаемся результатом и не замечаем работу мозга, которая происходила до него. Посмотрите на спортсменов …

👍7🔥5❤2

28 Jul 2026, 13:54 UTC82 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Заблуждение считать, что развитие ребенка (и взрослого) идет по прямой только вверх. Бывают периоды, когда кажется, что ничего не меняется или даже происходит небольшой откат (регресс). Схематически изобразила. Это нормально. Развитие НЕ останавливается. Мозг продолжает работать: закрепляет уже освоенные навыки, выстраивает новые связи и готовится к следующему этапу. Часто именно после таких "пауз" происходят самы…

❤4👍3🔥2

24 Jul 2026, 14:24 UTC99 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Почему родителям важно понимать разницу между темпераментом и нейродинамикой? Мой ребенок холерик, поэтому не может долго заниматься. Часто слышу подобные объяснения. Но в БОЛЬШИНСТВЕ случаев проблема не в темпераменте. Представьте, что нервная система - это автомобиль. ❕Темперамент - это модель автомобиля. Один похож на спортивную машину, другой - на надежный семейный автомобиль, третий - на компактный городской…

❤11👍5

21 Jul 2026, 15:56 UTC103 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Какого ребенка сложнее всего воспитывать❓ Сложнее всего воспитывать ребенка, чей темперамент родители не понимают и пытаются переделать. ✨ Холерика постоянно просят: "Не шуми", "Сиди спокойно", "Не злись". ✨ Флегматика каждую минуту торопят: "Ну быстрее!", "Все уже закончили!". Интересно, что в опросе флегматиков не обнаружилось🔍 ✨ Сангвиника заставляют часами выполнять однообразные задания без перерыва. ✨ Мелан…

❤9🔥5👻1

18 Jul 2026, 14:29 UTC91 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Накопившаяся за год усталость догнала меня в июне💔 Несмотря на то, что я старалась максимально разгрузить своё рабочее расписание на лето, полностью этого сделать не получилось. Часть детей осталась в работе: кому-то удобнее заниматься именно летом, кто-то готовится к школе. ➕личные планы и задачи, связанные с моими детьми. Поэтому всё это время я оставалась включённой. И организм дал понять, что пора остановиться…

❤17🔥7😍3👍2

17 Jul 2026, 14:07 UTC90 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Темперамент вашего ребенка похож на ваш?

  1. Да, скорее на меня27%
  2. Скорее на второго родителя13%
  3. На нас обоих понемногу33%
  4. Совсем не похож ни на кого27%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

17 Jul 2026, 14:05 UTC95 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Какой темперамент преобладает, по вашему мнению, у вашего ребенка? Можно несколько ответов, если детей больше одного 😀

  1. Холерик62%
  2. Сангвиник23%
  3. Флегматик8%
  4. Меланхолик46%

The shares total 139%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @neuropsy_safronova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

17 Jul 2026, 14:07 UTCAnonymous Poll15 voters

Темперамент вашего ребенка похож на ваш?

  1. Да, скорее на меня27%
  2. Скорее на второго родителя13%
  3. На нас обоих понемногу33%
  4. Совсем не похож ни на кого27%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

17 Jul 2026, 14:05 UTCAnonymous Poll13 voters

Какой темперамент преобладает, по вашему мнению, у вашего ребенка? Можно несколько ответов, если детей больше одного 😀

  1. Холерик62%
  2. Сангвиник23%
  3. Флегматик8%
  4. Меланхолик46%

The shares total 139%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Любовь Сафронова | НЕЙРОПСИХОЛОГ” (@neuropsy_safronova), 204 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/neuropsy_safronova.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.