Channel
@neuromarketingdaj
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
318subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001100510771 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @neuromarketingdaj |
| Description | برای اطلاع رسانی فعالیتها و تازه ها، اموزش و برگزاري كارگاه نورومارکتینگ همچنين انجام پروژه هاي دانشگاهي و تجاري و تجهيز آزمايشگاه تحقیق و ارائه دیتا به مدیران Neuromarketing Neurobranding UX/UI, eye tracking, EEG,,IAT, biometric, Behavior @dajsupport |
| Created | 4 February 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/neuromarketingdaj |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @neuromarketingdaj/818 · this entry19 Jun 2022, 11:28 UTC | @dajscientific/101419 Jun 2022, 14:47 UTC | 1.00 | 3.3 hours |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @dajscientific | 8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 2 minutes | @dajscientific (6–2) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 17 comparable posts for this entry, running 2 December 2020 to 9 October 2023. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @dajscientific. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:03 | 318 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:15 | 318 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 8 October 2020 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 October 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
با افتخار و سپاس از همراهی شما کارگاه ردیابی چشم امسال را به درخواست های متعدد در خدمت دانشجویان و علاقه مندان خواهیم بود ⭕روز های جمعه 28و21 مهر ساعت 12 الی 19 بخش عملی در روز پنج شنبه 4 آبان بصورت گروه بندی در 2 ساعت برای هر گروه برگزار میگردد. در این کارگاه جامع شما از مقدمات و بنیانهای نظری تا نمونه پروژه ها در زمینه تصمیم گیری ، شناختی ، زبانشناسی ، مارکتینگ ، تحقیقات بازار، روانشناسی ... و در ادامه طراحی ت…
Photo, posted without a caption
💠دوره جامع آشنایی نظری و عملی با ثبت، تحلیل و پردازش ردیابی چشم💠 🕑مدت دوره: ۲۵ ساعت (آنلاین و حضوری) 🗓زمان: دی ماه ۱۴۰۱ دستاوردهای دوره: 🎁امکان ثبت نام گروهی با تخفیف ويژه 🎁امکان انجام پروژه در بخش ردیاب چشمی آزمایشگاه تا سقف ۱۰ ساعت به صورت رایگان 🎁امکان دریافت تخفیف تا سقف ۲ میلیون تومان جهت انجام پروژه در بخش VR 🎁امکان دسترسی آنلاین به ویدیوهای آموزشی دوره به مدت حداقل یک ماه و نیم ‼️ظرفیت محدود‼️ جهت ثب…
یک فرصت یادگیری کم نظیر از بزرگان و اساتید دانش مغز از دست ندهید روز جمعه هم میتوانید از غرفه ما در محل آزمایشگاه بازدید بفرمایید. دیدن شما باعث خوشحالی و امکان مندی کشف فرصتهاست ۱۵-۱۷ تیرماه سمپوزیوم نقشه برداری مغز www.nbml.ir اطلاعات بیشتر
Besa, Source localization webinar - HEADLINES 9:30 -11:00am Dr. Anahita Khorrami , Foundations and applications of source localization In basic and clinical science of brain 11:30 -13:00 Dr. Harald Bornfleth 1. Introduction to source localization 2. ERPs and paradigms 3. Besa solutions for source localization and source imaging 4. Individual MRI co-registration 5. A sample epilepsy …
Epilepsy, spike , Erp Source localization webinar For first time in Iran آزمایشگاه ملی نقشه برداری مغز با همکاری گروه علمی داج برگزار میکند اولین وبینار مکان یابی منبع سیگنال در مغز اهمیت؛ کاربرد ها و روشهای علمی و فنی آن کاربرد بالینی در صرع و تشخیص پیش از جراحی براساس متد Besa لینک ثبت نام https://nbml.ir/fa/events/Source-localization-webinar
سلام روز بخیر دانشجویان علاقه مند شرکت در کارگاه فوق برای گرفتن کد تخفیف 20% تا عصر امروز پیام دهند - کارت دانشجویی الزامی است -با احترام گروه علمی داج
Eye tracking workshop کارگاه ردیابی چشم از مبانی توجه بصری تا آنالیز پنج شنبه 2 تیرماه بصورت ترکیبی -آنلاین و حضوری ساعت 15-19 ✴️آخرین مهلت ثبت نام روز سه شنبه لینک ثبت نام https://daj-scientific.net/cls/eye-tracking-workshop/
گروه علمی داج به عنوان حامی سمپوزیوم تازه های نقشه برداری مغز افتخار دارد که چند کد تخفیف ثبت نام در سمپوزیوم را به اعضا محترم تقدیم نماید . خواهشمند است برای استفاده از کد تخفیف پیامی برای ما در واتس اپ 09027770112 ارسال فرمایید . مهلت استفاده از کد های تخفیف تا روز جمعه همین هفته است تاریخ پست 17 خرداد 1401
💠ششمين سمپوزیوم تازههای نقشه برداری مغز ایران #ISBM2022 «مجازی- حضوری» 🗓️زمان: ١٥ و ١٦ و ۱۷ تیرماه ۱٤٠١ 📌جهت کسب اطلاعات بیشتر و ثبت نام در سمپوزیوم کلیک کنید. 📖 جهت ارسال مقاله در فرمت full text کلیک کنید. 🔹جهت ارسال چكيده ٥٠٠ كلمه اي از مقالاتي كه منجر به يك ارزش كلينيكي شده است و دريافت جوايز اين بخش کلیک کنید. 💠مهلت ارسال مقاله: ۱۶ خرداد💠 🔻جهت ثبت نام در پنل های کلینیکی حاشیه سمپوزیوم(حضوری …
کارگاه تئوری و عملی EEG + Eye tracking اطلاعات بیشتر و ثبت نام در لینک زیر https://daj-scientific.net/cls/eeg-eyetracking-workshop/ سوالات بصورت پیام در واتس آپ 09027770112
از اول زمستان به مدت سه روز دهمین کنگره علوم اعصاب پایه و بالینی بصورت آنلاین و رایگان برگزار میگردد. خوشحالیم که با شما همراه هستیم. برای شرکت در این کنگره میتوانید به سایت bcnc.ir مراجعه بفرمایید. در گروه علمی داج - اسپانسر کنگره علوم اعصاب- با شما بیشتر یاد خواهیم گرفت. #نوروساینس #علوم_اعصاب #علوم_شناختی #مغزواعصاب
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @neuromarketingdaj. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“نورومارکتینگ - گروه علمي داج” (@neuromarketingdaj), 318 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/neuromarketingdaj.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.