Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝕹𝖊𝖚𝖗𝖔𝖒𝖆𝖌𝖎𝖈𝖐

Channel

𝕹𝖊𝖚𝖗𝖔𝖒𝖆𝖌𝖎𝖈𝖐

@neuromagick

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

108subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001540594843
TypeChannel
Username@neuromagick
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/neuromagick

Growth

107108107.57 August 2026 — 107 subscribers9 August 2026 — 107 subscribers16 August 2026 — 108 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 107–108 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 07:48108+1
9 Aug 2026, 08:16107no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:06107first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
35s
Average length
5s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

27 reactions across 13 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5370889206744772365725.9%
custom 5281004736764471469414.8%
custom 5339416077241708818414.8%
custom 5346273327537219002414.8%
custom 5278334018725634159311.1%
custom 534617575447019040527.41%
custom 534629673510898165227.41%
custom 528055494201943083113.70%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 January 2026 to 31 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jan 2026, 16:37 UTC58 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Хотите себе такой же арт? — Генерация видео: – стандартное 5-секундное видео (возможно зацикленное видео) = 3000₽ – удлиненное видео (от 5 до 20 секунд, возможны переходы между разными сценами) = 5000₽ – добавление к видео сгенерированной музыки = +2000₽ к стоимости самого видео Подробнее об услугах и ценах 😉

custom 52783340187256341591custom 53394160772417088181

31 Jan 2026, 16:37 UTC62 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
File

Хотите себе такой же арт? — Генерация музыки = 2000₽ за трек Подробнее об услугах и ценах 😉

custom 53462733275372190021custom 53708892067447723651

31 Jan 2026, 10:15 UTC48 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Хотите себе такой же арт? — Генерация картинки = 1000₽ за картинку Подробнее об услугах и ценах 😉

custom 53394160772417088181custom 53461757544701904051custom 53708892067447723651

30 Jan 2026, 16:37 UTC28 views0 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Хотите себе такой же арт? — Генерация видео: – стандартное 5-секундное видео (возможно зацикленное видео) = 3000₽ – удлиненное видео (от 5 до 20 секунд, возможны переходы между разными сценами) = 5000₽ – добавление к видео сгенерированной музыки = +2000₽ к стоимости самого видео Подробнее об услугах и ценах 😉

30 Jan 2026, 16:37 UTC38 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
File

Хотите себе такой же арт? — Генерация музыки = 2000₽ за трек Подробнее об услугах и ценах 😉

custom 52810047367644714691custom 53462967351089816521

30 Jan 2026, 10:15 UTC32 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Хотите себе такой же арт? — Генерация картинки = 1000₽ за картинку Подробнее об услугах и ценах 😉

custom 52810047367644714691custom 53708892067447723651

29 Jan 2026, 16:37 UTC31 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Хотите себе такой же арт? — Генерация видео: – стандартное 5-секундное видео (возможно зацикленное видео) = 3000₽ – удлиненное видео (от 5 до 20 секунд, возможны переходы между разными сценами) = 5000₽ – добавление к видео сгенерированной музыки = +2000₽ к стоимости самого видео Подробнее об услугах и ценах 😉

custom 52805549420194308311

29 Jan 2026, 16:37 UTC30 viewsread 9 August 2026
File

Хотите себе такой же арт? — Генерация музыки = 2000₽ за трек Подробнее об услугах и ценах 😉

29 Jan 2026, 10:14 UTC26 views0 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Хотите себе такой же арт? — Генерация картинки = 1000₽ за картинку Подробнее об услугах и ценах 😉

28 Jan 2026, 16:37 UTC26 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Хотите себе такой же арт? — Генерация видео: – стандартное 5-секундное видео (возможно зацикленное видео) = 3000₽ – удлиненное видео (от 5 до 20 секунд, возможны переходы между разными сценами) = 5000₽ – добавление к видео сгенерированной музыки = +2000₽ к стоимости самого видео Подробнее об услугах и ценах 😉

custom 52810047367644714691custom 53461757544701904051

28 Jan 2026, 16:37 UTC27 viewsread 9 August 2026
File

Хотите себе такой же арт? — Генерация музыки = 2000₽ за трек Подробнее об услугах и ценах 😉

28 Jan 2026, 10:14 UTC26 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Хотите себе такой же арт? — Генерация картинки = 1000₽ за картинку Подробнее об услугах и ценах 😉

custom 52783340187256341591

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @neuromagick. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 780,942 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝕹𝖊𝖚𝖗𝖔𝖒𝖆𝖌𝖎𝖈𝖐” (@neuromagick), 108 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/neuromagick.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.