Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Нейрокостя.

Channel

Нейрокостя.

@neurokostya

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

162subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002150313044
TypeChannel
Username@neurokostya
CreatedBetween 1 April 2024 and 31 October 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/neurokostya

Growth

161162161.56 August 2026 — 161 subscribers8 August 2026 — 161 subscribers15 August 2026 — 162 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 161–162 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 01:15162+1
8 Aug 2026, 17:01161no change
6 Aug 2026, 21:32161first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 24s
Average length
42s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

103 reactions across 16 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥5048.5%
😁2221.4%
109.71%
🤣98.74%
👍54.85%
😱21.94%
🏆10.971%
🐳10.971%
🙏10.971%
🤝10.971%
🤯10.971%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 103reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 December 2025 to 29 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 May 2026, 16:29 UTC122 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍4🤣31

19 May 2026, 17:24 UTC169 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

Гугол модельку подогнал. Бежим тестить или не бежим.

14 May 2026, 11:51 UTC170 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ИИ увольняет дорогих Годами нам обещали, что роботы первым делом выгонят на улицу кассиров, курьеров и операторов техподдержки, а мы, будем управлять машинами в чистых офисах. Чтож, тперь могу сказать прямо: реальность оказалась ровно противоположной. Нейросети бьют по тем, кто много зарабатывает. А заменять дешевый труд алгоритмами сегодня — часто просто экономическое самоубийство. Смотрите, откуда берется иллюзия

🔥7

1 May 2026, 13:39 UTC298 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Про агентов Я уже рассуждал про концепцию агентского опыта? Так вот, я твердо убежден: эпоха привычных кнопок и бесконечных меню стремительно уходит в закат. И вот почему. Конец эпохи жестких рамок Традиционная разработка — это всегда строгие правила. Под каждую функцию нужна отдельная кнопка, под каждый ввод — свое прямоугольное поле. Мы буквально втискиваем живые человеческие потребности в жесткие сценарии, кото

🔥5

27 Apr 2026, 08:32 UTC135 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

😎 Помню, относительно недавно я делал игру в ретро-стиле и мне остро не хватало подобного шрифта, а тут ребята из Терминала запилили такую штуку: Шрифт Коньково — оммаж на тему первой макоси, бесплатный для персонального и ком использования. Хорошие ребята. Рекомендую за ними послеживать.

🔥21🙏1

26 Apr 2026, 16:03 UTC125 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Мульти-агентный фреймворк.

😁5

24 Apr 2026, 17:25 UTC235 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

😎 Иллюзия автоматизации: почему ИИ до сих пор пасует перед нормальной дизайн-системой Все мы видели эти красивые демки, где нейросеть за пару секунд генерит интерфейс по одному промпту. Выглядит как магия, пока вы не попытаетесь применить это в реальном продакшене. Как только вы говорите ИИ: «Собери этот же экран, но используя нашу корпоративную ДС», магия заканчивается. Начинаются галлюцинации, костыли, слезы и пиз

2🔥2🏆1

5 Apr 2026, 11:26 UTC308 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Хотел было я насладится прелестями новой модель от Гугл о которой писал ранее, но Gemma 4 не захотела дружить с LM Studio, но я не сдался, расчехлил Ollama и всё залетело вообще без проблем. Рассказываю по шагам, как поднять это у себя и не сойти с ума: 1️⃣ Ставим Ollama с официального сайта. 2️⃣ Открываем терминал (WIN+R -> CMD) и вбиваем команду: ollama run gemma4:e4b. 3️⃣ Чуть-чуть ждем, пока подтянется магия, и

🔥5🤝1

3 Apr 2026, 07:57 UTC131 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ну что, скачивание Gemma4 пошло, будто-бы для такой модели 6.3gb это реально прорыв. Особое внимание уделю пониманию контекста русского языка.

3 Apr 2026, 07:09 UTC150 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

😎 Релиз Cursor 3 — полный разъеб Cursor 3 выкатил обновление, которое меняет правила игры. Cursor уже и так больше, чем просто автодополнение кода — это теперь это целая банда агентов, которые готовы проектировать, кодить и теперь даже деплоить на прод задачи любой сложности. Что внутри? Чистый жир! Теперь можно запускать СКОЛЬКО УГОДНО агентов одновременно. Хотите — один пишет фронт, второй пилит бэкенд, третий п

🔥4

2 Apr 2026, 17:24 UTC119 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

😎 Так, ребят, тут новость. Google релизнули новую модельку и по ходу окончательно закрыли вопрос: «Нужно ли быть огромным, чтобы быть эффективным?». Релиз Gemma 4 — это не просто минорное обновление и вот почему. Модели на 26B и 31B параметров наглядно показывают — индустрия наигралась в раздутые облака и уходит в жесткую оптимизацию. Теперь мощный AI заводится почти на любом «железе», вплоть до мультиварки. Для би

🔥51

2 Apr 2026, 05:48 UTC101 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

😎 AirLLM: Как засунуть взрослые LLM в твою хилую видюху В последнее время нейронки растут как на дрожжах — настоящие цифровые левиафаны. Чтобы запустить ту же Llama 3 на 70 ярдов параметров, раньше нужно было либо продать почку за серверное железо, либо обливаться слезами, глядя на ошибку out of memory. Домашние карты просто «падали» в обморок. Но тут подвезли AirLLM, и это немного меняет правила игры. Магия послой

🔥4

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @neurokostya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 760,031 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Нейрокостя.” (@neurokostya), 162 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/neurokostya.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.