Прям счас на эфире получили отзыв. Коллеги, спасибо вам за высокую оценку нашей работы 🙌
🔥3

Channel
@neurohoreca
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
4,711subscribers
-29 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002362095090 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @neurohoreca |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/neurohoreca |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:46 | 4,711 | -13 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:33 | 4,724 | -12 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:57 | 4,736 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:46 | 4,740 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:33 | 4,740 | first reading |
29 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 18 of 29 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 29 (25 July 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 8,886 |
| Reactions total | 60 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 05:26 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
60 reactions across 18 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 21 | 35.0% | |
| 🔥 | 20 | 33.3% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 8.33% | |
| ⚡ | 4 | 6.67% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 5.00% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 3.33% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 3.33% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 1.67% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 1.67% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 1.67% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 60reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Прям счас на эфире получили отзыв. Коллеги, спасибо вам за высокую оценку нашей работы 🙌
🔥3
👹👺🤡💩 Мы начали практикум для шефов и управляющих кухней Сегодня разберём ключевые изменения в работе шефа и дадим инструменты, которые можно внедрить уже на следующий день, чтоб ускорить свою работу и выйти на новый уровень. 👇 Подключайтесь сейчас ПОДКЛЮЧИТЬСЯ
❤1🔥1
‼️ Через 15 минут начинаем эфир Вы готовы? Сегодня будет много практики и советов по внедрению ИИ на кухню. 👇 Ссылка на подключение уже у вас ЗАЙТИ НА ПРАКТИКУМ https://clck.ru/3U8UHs https://clck.ru/3U8UHs https://clck.ru/3U8UHs
☄️1 час до практикума для шефов! Коллеги, через час стартует наш открытый практикум: «ИИ на кухне: что работает, что нет и как внедрить и не облажаться» На эфире разберём: – Скорость шефа, как конкурентное преимущество и как ИИ это меняет. – Почему рынок платит 300–500к операционным шефам и что они умеют, чего не умеете вы. – Год практики: что изменилось у шефов через 3–6 месяцев после внедрения ИИ. Регистрируйт…
⚡️Коллеги, сегодня в 18:00 мск всех жду на открытом практикуме! Я покажу, какие инструменты у шефов сейчас работают, а какие нет. И еще презентую обновлённый Ресториум. Плюс разберём, как шефу выйти на доход от 350к+. Все это на живых примерах наших ребят, у которых уже получилось это сделать. И да, для участников эфира будут подарки. ❗️Очень вас жду СЕГОДНЯ В 18:00 МСК ➡️ Если еще не зарегистрировались, ловите …
❤4
⚡️На это у нашей команды ушел целый год. Мы занимаемся внедрением искусственного интеллекта в HoReCa уже больше года. ✔️Обучили более 1000 шефов. ✔️ Вдумайтесь — только в базе нашего операционного ИИ-сервиса Ресториум 7500 пользователей, и из этого опыта у нас сформировалась мощная система: как реально устроены процессы на кухне и что в них можно улучшать через ИИ. Пока многие ковыряются в ИИ, смотрят видео и тра…
🔥1
Есть один миф, в который до сих пор верят многие шефы… что высокая зарплата приходит вместе со стажем. Мол, чем дольше работаешь в профессии, тем выше тебя будет ценить рынок. Но если посмотреть вокруг, становится понятно, что это давно не так. Есть шефы с опытом 15–20 лет, которые получают 120–150 тысяч рублей. А есть операционные шефы, которым готовы платить 300–500 тысяч. Рынок давно перестал платить только за …
А сколько времени в день вы тратите на рутинные задачи?
The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Через год один из этих шефов будет получать в 2 раза больше. Представьте двух шефов: одинаковый опыт, одинаковая команда, одинаковые проекты. Оба хорошо готовят, умеют работать с людьми и знают своё дело. Но есть одна разница…. 📍 Первый заканчивает день с ощущением, что опять ничего не успел. Вроде весь день был занят, а на развитие кухни времени так и не осталось. 📍 Второй делает те же самые задачи значительно бы…
ИИ на кухне: что работает, что нет и как внедрить и не облажаться Кажется, тема искусственного интеллекта сейчас звучит громче, чем открытие нового мишленовского ресторана. Мы протестировали сотни сценариев работы, внедрили ИИ в реальные процессы ресторанов и получили огромное количество обратной связи от шефов, технологов и управляющих. И сделали один вывод. ИИ не заменит шефа, но его заменит другой шеф, который и…
🔥3❤2
ФЕШЕНАБЕЛЬНО! БРАВИСИМО! И Ресториум и тот кто придумал такие произведения искусства!
⚡1🥰1
Благодарим!
👌1
Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @neurohoreca. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
А сколько времени в день вы тратите на рутинные задачи?
The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Что вас сильнее всего останавливает от профессионального роста ?
The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 499,750 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“НЕЙРОСЕТИ ДЛЯ HORECA / КОНСТАНТИН ОПЕСКИН” (@neurohoreca), 4,711 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/neurohoreca.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.