Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Нейро Джу

Channel

Нейро Джу

@neuro_ju

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

20subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003761501285
TypeChannel
Username@neuro_ju
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 9 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/neuro_ju

Growth

192019.59 August 2026 — 19 subscribers11 August 2026 — 19 subscribers16 September 2026 — 20 subscribers9 August 202616 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 38 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19–20 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 19:1720+1
11 Aug 2026, 16:4719no change
9 Aug 2026, 08:3019first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 9 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

23 reactions across 7 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1147.8%
💯417.4%
🔥313.0%
🙈28.70%
14.35%
👌14.35%
👍14.35%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 9 May 2026 to 27 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Jun 2026, 17:11 UTC37 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

👍1

7 Jun 2026, 09:46 UTC62 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🧐Зачем вам 5 разных нейросетей, если вы не знаете, кому доверить код, а кому контент? Обзор LLM моделей. Кажется, новые нейросети появляются быстрее, чем обновления в Telegram. Каждый день кто-то пишет: «А что лучше — GPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok или DeepSeek?» Спойлер: идеальной модели не существует. У каждой свои сильные стороны и свои "приколы". 🧠 GPT (OpenAI) Сильные стороны: ✅ Очень универсальная модель ✅ Отли

2🔥1

3 Jun 2026, 15:50 UTC56 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

😫 90% людей используют AI неправильно. Вот почему и как это исправить Вы думаете, что AI умеет читать мысли? 😄 Большинство так и считает… и именно поэтому 90% пользователей получают посредственные результаты. Причина: люди ожидают какое-то волшебство. Они просто вводят вопрос и ждут идеального ответа, не думая о том, что AI — это алгоритм, а не гадалка таро. 🖕 Что происходит: - Вы даёте общий запрос вроде “Сдела

3👌1

3 Jun 2026, 11:36 UTC46 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Затестила 3 генеративные модели: Nano banana 2 (фото 1), Nano banana pro (фото 2) и GPT Image 2 (фото 3) С одним и тем же референсом и промптом. Очевидно, что GPT 2 с заменой лица справился просто на Ура! Он точно скопировал все мои черты лица. Но не послушался промпт «взгляд прямо в камеру — задумчивый и серьезный» Браво! Open Ai действительно добилась гиперреалистичных изображений, вы только сравните детализации

🔥21

3 Jun 2026, 10:06 UTC39 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🔫 Недавно поймала себя на мысли: все обсуждают, какие профессии ИИ убьёт. Но почти никто не говорит о том, сколько новых профессий он уже создаёт. И вот тут начинается самое интересное. 🤨 До 2030 года самыми востребованными могут стать не программисты и не разработчики нейросетей. А люди, которые умеют заставлять ИИ работать на бизнес. Например: — AI Automation Specialist — человек, который автоматизирует процес

💯211

18 May 2026, 12:23 UTC63 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Пока одни спорят «заменит ли ИИ людей», другие уже строят зарядные станции для роботов. 🤖 Я смотрела интервью Маргулана — инвестора с сотнями миллионов в портфеле. И он сказал вещь, от которой мурашки бегут по коже: — «Компании будущего строятся не вокруг человека. Ядро бизнеса — это ИИ». Понимаете масштаб? Пока большинство ещё думает «может, попробую ChatGPT», большие дяди уже строят инфраструктуру для роботов.

4💯2

9 May 2026, 12:46 UTC82 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

За год 90 тысяч человек потеряли работу из-за ИИ по данным jobloss.ai Основной удар пришелся на США - 76% сокращений. Больше всего людей заменили в Amazon (30 тысяч человек за три волны) и Microsoft (15 тысяч человек за две волны). Некоторые гендиры так увлеклись модным трендом что переувольняли почти половину штата. Главная причина биоутилизации отнюдь не бедность компаний, а, напротив: “прогресс”, “инновации”, “а

🙈2

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @neuro_ju. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Нейро Джу” (@neuro_ju), 20 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/neuro_ju.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.