Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

نوروکمپ روانشناسی

@neuro_camp

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

8,045subscribers

+57 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001422726637
TypeChannel
Username@neuro_camp
Descriptionنوروکمپ 🧠 - کنکور ارشد روانشناسی - روانشناسی فیزیولوژیک، انگیزش‌وهیجان - علوم شناختی و علوم اعصاب ✍️امین کرابی دانشجوی روانشناسی شناختی دانشگاه شهید بهشتی جهت ارتباط: @cognam ارتباط از طریق «بله» در صورت قطعی اینترنت: https://ble.ir/neuro_camp
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/neuro_camp

Growth

7,9888,0458,016.56 August 2026 — 7,988 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,995 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,028 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8,045 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +57. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,979–8,054 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 16:438,045+17
9 Aug 2026, 07:548,028+33
6 Aug 2026, 18:257,995+7
6 Aug 2026, 08:197,988first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 16 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
79.7%
avg views ÷ 8,045 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,410
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
10
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 July 2026
Posts held20 (16 February 202622 July 2026)
Views total64,090
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 16:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
191
Videos
11
Links
49

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

22 Jul 2026, 15:12 UTC≈4,480 viewsread 6 August 2026

چطوری اعتراض رو ثبت‌ کنیم؟ متن سازمان‌ سنجش: در صورتی که به کلید اولیه نکات اصلاحی و تکمیلی دارید لازم است از تاريخ 1405/05/01 تا تاریخ 1405/05/05 با مراجعه به سامانه پاسخگویی اینترنتی (request.sanjesh.org) نسبت به ثبت نظر در قالب فرم "اعلام نظر به کلید سوالات آزمون کارشناسی ارشد سال 1405" اقدام نمایید.

22 Jul 2026, 15:08 UTC≈4,070 viewsread 12 August 2026

در ارتباط با تست ۱۸۳ لطفا دقت کنید: این تست خیلی منصفانه نبود و میتونست بهتر مطرح بشه 😅 - اولین ‌نکته این هست که باید بدونیم که دستگاه فعالساز شبکه‌ای در طول ساقه مغز پخش شده. - دوم اینکه ما میدونیم در بالای مغز میانی غده صنوبری قرار داره و ملاتونین ترشح میکنه (داخل کتاب در بحث مغز‌میانی هم اوردیم). - اما نکته مهمی که طراح دست گذاشته روش اینه ترکیب بیداری و توجه رو خواسته. پل مغزی قطعا در تنظیم بیداری نقش داره اما ت

22 Jul 2026, 12:01 UTC≈4,720 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

تست ۱۷۲ باید گزینه «غیرمتتظره» پاسخ صحیح باشه. رفرنس: صفحه ۱۹۱ و ۱۹۲ کتاب انگیزش و هیجان، تالیف جان مارشال ریو؛ ترجمه یحیی سیدمحمدی، تهران: نشر ویرایش، ۱۳۹۹

22 Jul 2026, 12:00 UTC≈3,980 viewsread 12 August 2026

سلام دوستان کلیدهای سنجش اومده لطفا برای تست ۱۷۲ اعتراض بزنید حتما طبق رفرنسی که میذارم👇

21 Jul 2026, 20:07 UTC≈4,210 viewsread 12 August 2026

سلام به همگی🌱 داوطلبای کنکور سال گذشته و حتی سال‌های گذشته😅 اگر نظر، پیشنهاد، انتقاد یا هر پیامی درباره کتاب و کلاس اقای کرابی دارید میتونید از طریق لینک زیر به صورت کاملاً ناشناس و محرمانه ما بگید.👇 https://daigo.ir/secret/neuro-camp از اینکه نمیرسیم پاسخ همه پیام‌ها رو بدیم خیلی شرمنده‌ایم🌱

17 Jul 2026, 20:23 UTC≈14,500 viewsread 12 August 2026
Voice message

✅ تحلیل سوالات روانشناشی فیزیولوژیک، انگیزش و هیجان کنکور ارشد ۱۴۰۵ @neuro_camp

17 Jul 2026, 20:16 UTC≈5,980 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

سوالات درس روانشناسی فیزیولوژیک، انگیزش‌ و هیجان کنکور ارشد ۱۴۰۵ ✅ کلید پیشنهادی: https://t.me/neuro_camp/390

17 Jul 2026, 11:17 UTC≈11,400 viewsread 12 August 2026

کلید پیشنهادی روانشناسی فیزیولوژیک، انگیزش و هیجان ✍️ امین کرابی ۱۷۱- دادن بازخورد دقیق و استقلال‌محور (غیرکنترل‌گر) و فراهم‌کردن گزینه‌های انتخابی برای انجام تمرین ۱۷۲- غیرمنتظره ۱۷۳- بازارزیابی شناختی ۱۷۴- اندازه‌گیری فیزیولوژیک (ضربان قلب، تعرق) ۱۷۵- کاهش کشاننده منجر به تقویت شود. ۱۷۶- ارزیابی مجدد مداوم در طول رویداد ۱۷۷- الگوهای فیزیولوژیک و‌ چهره‌ای جهان‌شمول ۱۷۸- درونی، ناپایدار و کنترل‌پذیر ۱۷۹- شرم ۱۸۰- پر

17 Jul 2026, 09:15 UTC≈5,460 viewsread 12 August 2026
Poll

نظر شما درباره درس روانشناسی فیزیولوژیک و انگیزش هیجان کنکور ارشد ۱۴۰۵؟

  1. آسان12%
  2. سخت25%
  3. متوسط58%
  4. خیلی سخت8%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

17 Jul 2026, 09:14 UTC≈5,290 viewsread 12 August 2026

سلام به همگی🌱 بالاخره کنکور ارشد ۱۴۰۵ هم برگزار شد... هنوز سوال‌ها بیرون نیومده اما اکثر بچه‌ها میگن که سطح سوالا کلا متوسط بوده. به محض اینکه سوال‌ها به دستمون برسه تحلیل درس فیزیولوژی و انگیزش‌هیجان رو قرار میدیم.

9 Jun 2026, 09:18 UTC≈9,410 viewsread 12 August 2026

نظرات و فیدبک شرکت‌کننده‌های کلاسهای ما: https://t.me/neuro_camp/259 https://t.me/neuro_camp/261 https://t.me/neuro_camp/360

9 Jun 2026, 09:15 UTC≈9,180 viewsread 12 August 2026

سلام عزیزان 🌱 نمونه کلاس جمع بندی رو میتونید از این لینک‌ها ببینید: https://www.aparat.com/v/apmh6y5 https://www.aparat.com/v/dru993p

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @neuro_camp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

17 Jul 2026, 09:15 UTCAnonymous Poll1,340 voters approx.

نظر شما درباره درس روانشناسی فیزیولوژیک و انگیزش هیجان کنکور ارشد ۱۴۰۵؟

  1. آسان12%
  2. سخت25%
  3. متوسط58%
  4. خیلی سخت8%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 February 2026 to 22 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 563,928 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“نوروکمپ روانشناسی” (@neuro_camp), 8,045 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/neuro_camp.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.