Channel
@networkparallax_001
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
87subscribers
+10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003701038573 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @networkparallax_001 |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/networkparallax_001 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 07:15 | 87 | +9 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:01 | 78 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:12 | 78 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:47 | 77 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (20 July 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,476 |
| Reactions total | 6 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 20:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
6 reactions across 4 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 6 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
$PAX IS HEADING TOWARD 200 MILLION SOFT HALVING IS GETTING CLOSER! The Parallax network has now reached approximately 171.9 million PAX mined, and we are still in Phase 1: Ignition (100–200 million PAX). But there is one important thing to pay attention to. ⏳ SOFT HALVING IS GETTING CLOSER Every time the total verified PAX reaches another 100 million milestone, the system automatically implements a Soft Halving, …
⚛️ Parallax Mining vs. Traditional Crypto Mining — What’s the Difference? When people hear “crypto mining,” they often imagine powerful computers, expensive GPUs, high electricity costs, and complicated setups. 🖥️⚡ But #networkparallax is taking a different approach. 📱🌍 🔹 Traditional Crypto Mining • 🖥️ Often requires powerful hardware • ⚡ Can consume significant amounts of electricity • 💰 Higher hardware investmen…
❤1
Why am I ready to buy $PAX tokens? Because PARALLAX is not just a mining app; it is a Web3 project for the future. https://t.me/networkparallax_001 https://t.me/BuyAndSell_PAX
💥💥COMING SOON📈 📈📉Buy and sell $PAX🪙 https://t.me/networkparallax_001 https://t.me/BuyAndSell_PAX Join Parallax Network now and start your crypto journey with no cost, zero battery drain, and 100% privacy. Use my code or tap the link and get 5 $PAX: Invite code 👉85E802E3 https://parallaxnetwork.xyz/i/85E802E3
About the minigames 🎮 There has been discussion about whether the minigames should give larger rewards or PAX directly. Here is the official position. PAX is issued only through mining. There will be no competitions, tasks, or badges that distribute PAX directly. This protects the scarcity and integrity of PAX. Minigame rankings reward players with a limited-time mining boost, never with direct PAX. The boost is a…
👀 Something is coming to the Parallax app… Mining is only the beginning. ⚛️ 🎮 Mini-Games are coming soon. A new way to interact with Parallax, explore the ecosystem, and make your time inside the app even more engaging. We’re not revealing everything yet… 🤫 But things are about to get a lot more fun. What kind of Mini-Game would you like to see in Parallax? 👇 #ParallaxNetwork #PAX #Web3
Is Parallax already on Mainnet? Can I withdraw my PAX? Not yet, and both are directly connected. Parallax Network is still in its development phase, with new technologies and infrastructure being introduced step by step. Before withdrawals become available, the network must complete key milestones, including testing, blockchain infrastructure, and the Mainnet launch. Once Mainnet is live and the migration process …
⚛️ Your Choice. Your Experience. At Parallax Network, watching ads is completely optional. Users who choose to watch ads can unlock additional benefits, including: ✅ Extend mining sessions from 4 to 8 hours (after maintaining a 7-day streak) ✅ Access the complete mining experience ✅ Continue supporting the growth of the ecosystem Prefer not to watch ads? No problem. You can still mine and participate in Paralla…
In the future, many people will use the Parallax wallet to store money, conduct transactions, and engage with various other systems. Parallax is not merely a mining application; it is a Web3 project for the future.
Everyone is encouraged to join the PARALLAX project—a project for the future of all. Join Parallax Network now and start your crypto journey with no cost, zero battery drain, and 100% privacy. Use my code or tap the link and get 5 $PAX: 85E802E3 https://parallaxnetwork.xyz/i/85E802E3
⚛️ Development Roadmap Every great blockchain begins with a vision, but it is built milestone by milestone. Since the launch of Parallax Network, we've continued to deliver new technologies, strengthen our infrastructure, and expand our global community. Each completed step brings us closer to a decentralized ecosystem designed for everyone. Current Progress ✅ Genesis Launch ✅ Mobile App ✅ Global Community 🔄 Biome…
Every city on the departure board shows the same status. Jakarta. Seoul. Tokyo. Singapore. Dubai. London. Paris. Berlin. New York. São Paulo. Nairobi. Sydney. And many more. Not because the destinations are the same. But because the trust being built is the same. Parallax Network is its own Layer 1 blockchain. Built on Move, powered by an original consensus: Proof-of-Time and Graph of Trust. Over 266,000 people f…
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @networkparallax_001. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 693,562 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Buy and sell $PAX” (@networkparallax_001), 87 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/networkparallax_001.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.