3 measurements spanning 8 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 366–367 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 07:54
367
+1
8 Aug 2026, 05:16
366
-1
7 Aug 2026, 06:17
367
first reading
Engagement
9 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
44.5%
avg views ÷ 367 subscribers
Avg views / post
163
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.71%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 9 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
9 (16 July 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
1,306
Reactions total
96
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 06:17 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
112 reactions across 8 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
35
31.3%
🔥
34
30.4%
❤
30
26.8%
custom 5229155736948336514
7
6.25%
🤩
4
3.57%
⚡
1
0.893%
🙏
1
0.893%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 112reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 9 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @network_community_moscow. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 9 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🎊✨ СЕТЬ Лидеров не сбавляет темп — встречайте новую тройку лауреатов премии!
Разные истории, разные пути — но каждый из них делает наше сообщество теплее и сильнее 👇
🥸 «Лучшее прикрытие года» — Субаш Анна Владимировна
Анна — тот самый человек, который дарит окружающим доброту и улыбки. Рядом с ней теплее и легче, а любая встреча становится чуть светлее. Именно такие люди незаметно, но очень прочно держат атмосферу…
🥇✨ А мы продолжаем — и сегодня в центре внимания сразу три ярких имени премии СЕТИ Лидеров!✨
Эти люди по-разному пришли к успеху, но каждого объединяет одно — они не стоят на месте. Знакомьтесь 👇
💼 «Бизнесмен года» — Сербин Алексей Юрьевич
За год Алексей совершил рывок, который впечатляет и в цифрах, и в качестве. Он развивает своё дело системно и с прицелом на перспективу, доказывая простую истину: устойчивый рост…
#сетьэтолюди
Александр Ханкеев ✨
💫 Управляющий инжиниринговой компанией ООО «Ривер Груп» — строительство инфраструктуры для промышленной отрасли.
💫 Основатель и генеральный директор машиностроительной компании ООО «НПО «Атлант»» (с 2022 года) — российская спецтехника вместо импортной.
💫 Участвовал в реализации проектов для «Газпрома», «СИБУР Холдинга», НОВАТЭКа, НИПИГАЗа, Renaissance Heavy Industries, Концерна «Тит…
🎉✨ Продолжаем знакомить вас с лауреатами ежегодной премии СЕТИ Лидеров!
Встречайте победителей этого года 👇
🏆 «Лучший агент года»
Солодкова Юлия Александровна
🤝 За выстраивание эффективной коммуникации между сообществом и резидентами, создание качественной обратной связи и привлечение новых участников в СЕТЬ Лидеров.
🎨 «Креатив года»
Волгина Юлия Викторовна
🌟 Человек, который соединяет современное развитие с сохра…
Продолжаем рубрику
#историисети
И сегодня делимся с вами статьей из нашей книги резидента Натальи Торик, генерального директора консалтинговой компании ProGRant, создателя и руководителя образовательного проекта Финансового университета при Правительстве РФ.
Эксперт в сфере взаимодействия бизнеса и государства, автор профильного учебника «GRавитация» и регулярных экспертных материалов в ведущих деловых изданиях.
Би…
🎉✨ В день рождения СЕТИ Лидеров стало доброй традицией чествовать наших лучших резидентов 🏆
Встречайте победителей этого года 👇
🌟 «Самый активный резидент»
Лукьянова Юлия Михайловна
💡 Человек, который щедро вносит идеи в развитие сообщества
💎 «Стиль личного бренда»
Лебедева Виктория Владимировна
👑 Человек, который знает, что такое репутация и стиль — в прямом и переносном смысле
👗 «Самый стильный агент»
Поспелова…
📄 Новый закон о цифровых валютах: легализация расчетов, жесткие лимиты и риск-ориентированные блокировки
Госдума приняла сразу во втором и третьем чтениях законопроект № 1194918-8 «О цифровой валюте и цифровых правах». Документ впервые создает в России полноценную правовую основу для оборота криптовалют.
Ключевые изменения:
1️⃣Криптовалюта признана имуществом с судебной защитой
🟢 Цифровые валюты становятся полноц…
Если вы ждали знак, это он ✅
Сеть.Путешествия 🌐 6 - 12 августа⚡️очень красивый и продуманный тур в Осетию⚡️
Тут будут погружение в культуру, потрясающие пейзажи и впечатления на всю жизнь
😁 Гастрономия и традиции
Обеды в гостях у местных жителей и кахетинский обед с тостами и домашними блюдами.
😁 Живописные горные маршруты
Мидаграбинская долина, Мамисон – Цей – Бирагзанг, Даргавс , Чудеса Южной Осетии
⠀
😁 В ст…
Ко дню рождения СЕТИ был выпущен ограниченный тираж книги, в которой были собраны истории наших резидентов и GR кейсы
🌐🌐🌐🌐
Уникальный сборник #1 теперь станет ежегодным.
Сегодня хотим поделиться с вами историей нашего резидента Ирины Смирновой, которая в СЕТИ с ее основания
👇👇👇
Ирина Смирнова, основатель «Центра защиты бизнеса Ирины Смирновой»
Сопричастность, которая меняет всё: когда я только пришла в «Сеть», я …
🔥10❤4👍2
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @network_community_moscow. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,020,633 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Сообщество СЕТЬ” (@network_community_moscow), 367 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/network_community_moscow.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
