Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

NetKey Team

@netkey_team

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

149subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002196976455
TypeChannel
Username@netkey_team
DescriptionКоманда энтузиастов по сетевым технологиям с образовательной миссией и целью улучшения нетворкинга специалистов. Инфо: https://t.me/netkey_team/4
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/netkey_team

Growth

1497 Aug 2026, 13:53 — 149 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 20:01 — 149 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 13:538 Aug 2026, 20:01
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 148–150 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 20:01149no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:53149first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 14 November 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
98.4%
avg views ÷ 149 subscribers
Avg views / post
147
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.91%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026
Posts held16 (14 November 202429 July 2026)
Views total440
Reactions total26
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 20:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
16
Links
19

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

77 reactions across 15 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥3849.4%
👍1823.4%
1215.6%
👎45.19%
😨33.90%
😢11.30%
😱11.30%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 77reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 14 November 2024 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 16 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @netkey_team. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 November 2024 to 29 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

29 Jul 2026, 12:21 UTC153 views5 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Потеря доступа на Check Point при настройке 2FA Если вдруг при настройке 2FA в Web-интерфейсе Gaia на Check Point версии R81.20 не успели отсканировать QR-код или еще по какой-либо причине потеряли доступ на Web-интерфейс и SSH, но остался доступ в SmartConsole, то можно выполнить такой скрипт через функционал One-Time Script: USERNAME="gaiaadmin2" PASSWORD="Str0ngPassword!" HASH=$(cpopenssl passwd -6 "$PASSWORD")

👍41

27 Jul 2026, 11:09 UTC136 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Кластер HA не собирается на FortiGate после обновления Столкнулся недавно с кейсом, что после обновления FortiGate 1000 серии в HA-кластере с ветки FortiOS v7.4 на v7.6 HA-кластер не поднялся автоматически. Сам FortiGate был с различными VDOM. Обновление делали согласно разделу "Uninterrupted upgrade" из гайда по обновлению FortiGate в HA кластере. Залили прошивку на FortiGate Primary, а далее кластер делал все сам

6👍4

23 Jul 2026, 17:00 UTC151 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Доброго вечера, наша дорогая аудитория канала NetKey Team! На связи Жанболат (@nurkeynw). Наш проект Network Quiz некоторое время назад перешел к новым владельцам, а мы двигаемся дальше. Этот канал я хочу переформатировать в личный инженерный блог и площадку для команды. На скрине выше можете посмотреть пример того, как я веду сети для новичков в одной академии онлайн, схематически и интерактивно разбирая процесс

🔥7👍21👎1

1 Feb 2026, 13:33 UTC370 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @network_quiz

👥 Уважаемая аудитория канала Network Quiz! Мы с вами хотим поделиться одной важной новостью. ⏭️ Мы, команда NetKey Team, передаём канал новому владельцу. Для нас это был увлекательный и познавательный путь. Спасибо каждому, кто был с нами: авторам квизов, экспертам по премодерации квизов, подписчиков, кто участвовал в обсуждениях квизов и отвечал на вопросы, за участие в жизни канала. Канал Network Quiz остается

😨3👍1👎1😢1😱1

11 Jun 2025, 13:28 UTC≈2,580 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

NetKey Team на GetNet/25 Один из наших авторов, Богдан Ильичев (@blessed_bogdan), выступил на конференции GetNet с квизом для участников. Конференция была посвящена тем, кто работает с сетями, администрированием, мониторингом и эксплуатацией IT-инфраструктуры. Квиз вызвал живой интерес среди офлайн-участников в Москве и онлайн-участников конференции. Поздравляем призёров! Призовые были выданы непосредственно орга

🔥32👎1

22 May 2025, 07:35 UTC604 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

NetKey Team - информационный партнер конференции и подготовит квизы для участников 📝 Для тех, кто не только решает квизы, но и применяет это в проде. 💡 6 июня в 11:00 пройдёт конференция GetNet — для тех, кто работает с сетями, администрированием, мониторингом и эксплуатацией ИТ-инфраструктуры. - Формат: онлайн (бесплатно) и оффлайн в Москве - Часть докладов уже на сайте, можно глянуть Если хочется услышать, ка

👍1👎1

21 May 2025, 10:36 UTC442 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @network_quiz

📡 Network Engineer | Алматы | офлайн Компания: Cloud24.kz (ТОО “Интернет Решения”) 🔍Cloud24.kz — казахстанская ИТ-компания, специализирующаяся на облачных и инфраструктурных решениях. Мы не просто “настраиваем сервера” — мы создаём цифровой фундамент для развития бизнеса. ⛅️ Работаем с крупными клиентами, строим отказоустойчивые системы и внедряем лучшие практики в ИТ-инфраструктуре. 💡 Наши инженеры это эксперты,

🔥3

14 May 2025, 08:33 UTC377 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @network_quiz

👥 Наша команда пополнилась двумя новыми постоянными авторами квизов - @CyberSecIP и @blessed_bogdan. Благодарим за отклик по набору авторов и надеемся на плодотворное сотрудничество! Следите за авторами квизов в шапке каждого поста с квизами. Теперь в нашей команде “Network Quiz”: 4️⃣ постоянных автора; 1️⃣ менеджер по рекламе/сотрудничеству; 8️⃣ экспертов, проверяющих каждый квиз перед публикацией. #netquiz_up

2🔥2

8 May 2025, 10:42 UTC413 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

👥 Состав команды NetKey Team: • Жанболат Нуркей (Zhanbolat Nurkey) Автор и тимлид @nurkeynw // LinkedIn • Руслан Чеусов (Ruslan Cheussov) Автор и менеджер по вопросам рекламы/сотрудничества @fafeka, @fafekawork // LinkedIn • Есен Избасаров (Yessen Izbassarov) Автор @europeiz // LinkedIn

🔥4

9 Jan 2025, 16:56 UTC589 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ieucariotPhoto

Вот, кстати, одна из бонусных сторон всех наших активностей. Не уверен, получилось ли у нас всколыхнуть казахстанское сообщество своим алмаатинским митапом в октябре, но что мы знаем наверняка - как минимум ребят, которые проводили у нас квиз мы мотивировали провести свой митапчик в Астане. Было правда, в ноябре, но почему бы не вспомнить) https://t.me/netkey_team/17

🔥3👍1

11 Dec 2024, 10:36 UTC627 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Заинтересовало ли вас обучение в академии ШАГ?

  1. Да, я заинтересован(-а) и хотел(-а) бы узнать больше32%
  2. Не хватает информации и остались вопросы5%
  3. Заинтересован(-а) и порекомендую своим знакомым9%
  4. Заинтересован(-а) и рассмотрю для обучения своего ребенка (детей)9%
  5. Не заинтересован(-а)36%
  6. Другое (напишу в комментариях 👇🏻)9%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

11 Dec 2024, 10:36 UTC512 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

​​🌐 NetKey Conf: Академия ШАГ Продолжаем разбирать итоги митапа NetKey Conf. На очереди - компьютерная академия ШАГ в г. Астана. Академия ШАГ является международным образовательным центром, который предоставляет IT-образование для взрослых и детей с сотнями тысяч выпускников по всему миру. Программа обучения с акцентом на практику и постоянно обновляется с учетом современных реалий. В академии ШАГ особое внимание

🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @netkey_team. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

11 Dec 2024, 10:36 UTCAnonymous Poll22 voters

Заинтересовало ли вас обучение в академии ШАГ?

  1. Да, я заинтересован(-а) и хотел(-а) бы узнать больше32%
  2. Не хватает информации и остались вопросы5%
  3. Заинтересован(-а) и порекомендую своим знакомым9%
  4. Заинтересован(-а) и рассмотрю для обучения своего ребенка (детей)9%
  5. Не заинтересован(-а)36%
  6. Другое (напишу в комментариях 👇🏻)9%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 14 November 2024 to 29 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“NetKey Team” (@netkey_team), 149 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/netkey_team.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.