Channel
@nestrashnie_bukvi
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
199subscribers
+7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002082506809 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nestrashnie_bukvi |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nestrashnie_bukvi |
Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Sept 2026, 22:38 | 199 | -1 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 23:09 | 200 | +5 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 07:27 | 195 | +2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:17 | 193 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:00 | 192 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:17 | 192 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 9 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
114 reactions across 7 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 67 | 58.8% | |
| 🔥 | 30 | 26.3% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 6.14% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 3.51% | |
| 😭 | 3 | 2.63% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 1.75% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.877% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 114 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 9 April 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Сегодня получила свой долгожданный подарок, который полтора месяца добирался до меня из Москвы Книжки! Мои родненькие книжки, которые 4 года назад пришлось оставить в Москве. Как человек, переезжавший несколько раз, могу сказать, что книги — самый тяжелый актив (и в прямом, и в переносном). Уезжая с двумя чемоданами вещей, именно от книг пришлось отказаться — они очень объемные и невероятно тяжелые. В дополнение к …
❤6😭3
В последние месяцы, плотно работая со шрифтами и сталкиваясь с постоянными поворотными моментами, где надо принимать взрослые шрифтовые решения, не раз возвращалась к мысли, что очень рада тому, что леттеринг в моей жизни случился первым. Мне кажется, что если бы я зашла в шрифт нулём, и узнавала о буквах через шрифтовую теорию и каллиграфию, то абсолютно точно в моей голове сформировалась бы система правил, которую…
❤8🔥3💯2
Последние полтора месяца активно продолжала работу над Эрвером и делала ему курсив Сказала бы "на курсе болдиталика", но как и писала раньше — по мне, это больше ощущается как мастерская, все полтора месяца — активная практика, размышления, пробы, проверка гипотез и так по кругу. Очень кайфовый формат, когда и над своим проектом работаешь, и помощь всегда рядом, если где-то есть затык, и поддержка есть, и группа так…
❤10🔥10
Не знаю, законно ли очень любить результат своей работы Но ничего поделать не могу. Каждый раз, когда выползаю из глифса и набираю своим шрифтом тексты, внутри от восторга переворачиваются все органы. Просто залипаю на экран и думаю: "ну как красиво". И всё тут 🤷🏻♀️ И пока я тут перевариваю кризис от приближающегося 36-летия и неожиданной английской жары, у Эрвера готовится италик. Какой? Очень красивый. Естестве…
❤11🔥7🎉1
Вот который день сижу и думаю: кто там кернинг не любит и не считает его творческой задачей? Очень даже творческая. Вчера в одном настроении покернила, сегодня открыла файл, смотрю и думаю, что за криволапый медведь это делал? Настроение другое и кернинг другой. Кернинг другой — характер шрифта меняется. Творческая задача? Так-то. С ума бы не сойти только #шрифт
😁7❤5💯2
Принесла вам буквы из барселонского дизайн-музея. Не впечатлил меня, но наличие этажа с экспозицией рекламной графики приятно. Там даже целый стенд с визитками из 90-х был) (прошу простить засветы, все лежало под стеклом) #буквы_вокруг
❤6🔥3👍2
В далёком 2017-ом я вышла на работу в Яндекс. Не знаю, как там всё устроено сейчас, но тогда в начале каждого месяца нам зачисляли на бейджик 9800 рублей. Эти деньги можно было тратить на еду, кофе и покупку всякой всячины в магазинах на территории. Мой первый рабочий день был 25 июля, а это значит, что чтобы эти 9800 не сгорели в августе, надо было успеть их потратить за 6 дней. И я, как настоящая врождённая зануда…
❤21🔥7
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @nestrashnie_bukvi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Нестрашные буквы” (@nestrashnie_bukvi), 199 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nestrashnie_bukvi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.