Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

хочется сладенько уснуть щас прям и спать и спать и спать в теплой кроватке и чтоб никто не трогал

@nesomna

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

221subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002686159442
TypeChannel
Username@nesomna
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/nesomna

Growth

221222221.56 Aug 2026, 11:21 — 222 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 02:07 — 221 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 03:17 — 221 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 11:217 Aug 2026, 03:17
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 221–222 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 03:17221no change
7 Aug 2026, 02:07221-1
6 Aug 2026, 11:21222first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 17 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
309
Videos
93
Links
13

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

265 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 525616246124080180211443.0%
custom 54137081151304836335018.9%
custom 54114284624538831952710.2%
custom 5411159614681024045217.92%
custom 5411228694935012881217.92%
custom 5413438133486258132166.04%
custom 5413551207090260275145.28%
custom 541138781058842623420.755%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 265reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 17 February 2026 to 8 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Mar 2026, 13:52 UTC484 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @freelaure

девушки, в этот прекрасный день напоминаю вам, что мы тоже можем — играть в доту — выкладывать на саундклаунд демки — изменять — делать темки — пить пиво с друзьями до 5 утра не слушайте тех, кто в вас не верит и считает, что женщины не способны заниматься традиционно мужскими делами

custom 52561624612408018028custom 54137081151304836335

8 Mar 2026, 13:51 UTC481 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Я немного пропала, но хочу поздравить вас с праздником. Девочки, девушки, женщины - вы прекрасны. Спасибо каждой за то, что делаете этот мир лучше. Желаю вам побольше слушать себя и свое сердце, сестры, этот день - лишь напоминание о нашей женской силе. Будьте счастливы и любимы. Мужчинщин, фембоев и кошкомальчиков тоже с праздником, но не от всего сердца

custom 52561624612408018029custom 54137081151304836334

27 Feb 2026, 15:06 UTC624 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 525616246124080180211custom 54134381334862581321

26 Feb 2026, 13:46 UTC453 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @tvoyavernayapsinaVideo

#планетамаким

custom 52561624612408018026

25 Feb 2026, 20:34 UTC382 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

мое отношение к таким психологам в одном скрине:

custom 525616246124080180217

25 Feb 2026, 10:04 UTC345 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 541122869493501288118custom 52561624612408018027custom 54134381334862581326

25 Feb 2026, 09:57 UTC317 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026

шли вторые сутки без интернета: ощущаю слабость в теле, сонливость, небольшие звуковые и визуальные галлюцинации, тремор рук

custom 541142846245388319515custom 54111596146810240457custom 52561624612408018024custom 54135512070902602752custom 54137081151304836331

24 Feb 2026, 14:14 UTC316 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 525616246124080180210custom 54135512070902602754custom 54137081151304836333

24 Feb 2026, 14:00 UTC307 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026

как ужасен мир без интернета. какие-то крысы перегрызли главный интернет кабель и теперь весь дом без интернета. жду, пока восстановят. и теперь я понимаю русских, у которых в один день то тг отвалится, то жопа, то еще что-то случится 🥀

custom 541115961468102404511custom 52561624612408018028custom 54135512070902602754custom 54137081151304836332

22 Feb 2026, 14:33 UTC546 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 54134381334862581326custom 52561624612408018025custom 54137081151304836333

21 Feb 2026, 14:17 UTC310 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @khorst1Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 52561624612408018024custom 54137081151304836334

20 Feb 2026, 09:46 UTC318 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

эра "буерак, электрофорез, увула, ssshhhiiittt, chernikovskaya hata, где фантом?, перемотка, молчат дома" никогда не умрет

custom 52561624612408018024custom 54112286949350128813custom 54137081151304836333

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @nesomna. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 604,244 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“хочется сладенько уснуть щас прям и спать и спать и спать в теплой кроватке и чтоб никто не трогал” (@nesomna), 221 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nesomna.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.